Package the Linux desktop head as an RPM, and publish a nightly one

The third desktop platform shipped as nothing: a checkout somebody built.
VelopackUpdateChannel already named the two platforms it serves rather than
negating the one it does not, so that a Linux package would be an addition
there rather than something that had silently half-happened. This is it, and
it is deliberately not a Velopack channel.

There is no updater in the package at all. On this platform dnf is already an
updater the user trusts, audits and controls, and a second one answering to
this project instead is the capability ADR 0013 rule 4 spends a page keeping
unsettable. The cost is real and is written down rather than glossed: nothing
tells a Linux user that a newer build exists, because there is no repository
to tell them.

Rule 3 is untouched. The build job packages the release-shaped RPM on every
main build and every tag and uploads nothing, exactly as it does for Windows
and macOS; the desktop job packages the nightly-shaped one and puts it on the
rolling nightly-desktop release beside the Windows feed. Two RPMs with
different names owning different paths cannot replace one another, so rule 9's
separations come almost free here — the profile split still belongs to the
build, through DodoChannel.

vpk verifies that what it packs actually calls VelopackApp.Build().Run(), and
nothing here does that for us, so scripts/ci-linux-rpm.sh makes its own
assertions: it asks the finished package what it requires, what it provides,
what it holds and what modes those carry. Two of those checks exist because
the first realistic payload tripped them.

  - .NET's libmscordbi.so links libmscordaccore.so. With bundled provides
    excluded — which they must be, or this package would advertise libcoreclr
    to the whole system — that produced a dependency no host on earth can
    satisfy. The requires exclusion is computed from the payload rather than
    listed, because a list of Microsoft's internal file names goes stale in
    the direction that yields an uninstallable package.

  - cp -a inherits the publish directory's modes, and off the wrong filesystem
    that meant a world-writable /opt/DodoSSH: any local account able to
    replace the SSH client every other account runs. For an application
    holding a team's credentials in plaintext that is the trust model walked
    around rather than attacked. Every mode is now set absolutely.

Verified as far as a runner can: both packages install side by side on Fedora
44, resolve webkit2gtk4.1 2.52.5 — the backend MainWindow records as measured
— keep separate launchers, icons and profiles, and dnf remove takes one tree
and leaves the other. 0.0.1~alpha.0.143 sorts below both 0.0.1 and the next
height. What no runner can answer is Phase 19, which is new and unwalked.

RHEL 9 is deliberately not claimed. It ships WebKitGTK's 4.0 line under
libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37, and an or-branch for it was written and then removed:
nobody has run the head there, and dnf refusing with "nothing provides
libwebkit2gtk-4.1.so.0" is a better answer than an install that draws a blank
terminal. Same sentence, and the same reason, as the missing Intel Mac.

x86_64 only, for that reason and not a different one.

README.md

@@ -177,6 +177,43 @@ passphrase screen, always. The application lives at `/Applications/DodoSSH.Deskt
 at `~/Library/Application Support/DodoSSH`, which are deliberately two different places so that removing the
 first never touches the second.
 
+## Installing on Linux
+
+An `.rpm` for x86_64, and the one platform where you get it from `main` rather than from a release — see
+[the nightly build](#the-nightly-desktop-build) below, which is where the Linux package is published today.
+
+```bash
+sudo dnf install ./dodossh-nightly-*.x86_64.rpm
+```
+
+Everything above about where a client may come from applies unchanged. Four things differ, and the first
+two are the ones to read before installing.
+
+**There is no self-updater, and that is the design rather than a gap.** The Windows and macOS builds carry
+Velopack and replace themselves; this one carries nothing of the sort and never contacts an update service.
+On Linux the package manager is already an updater the person running it trusts, audits and controls, and
+adding a second one that answers somewhere else would be handing back exactly the capability
+[ADR 0013](docs/adr/0013-desktop-distribution-and-updates.md) rule 4 spends a page keeping out of reach.
+The cost is real and worth stating plainly: this project publishes no package repository, so nothing tells
+you when a newer build exists. You install the next one the way you installed this one.
+
+**Your passphrase is asked for every time, because there is no hardware key store here.** Windows has a TPM
+behind a consent dialog and a Mac has the Secure Enclave behind Touch ID; the Linux head has neither wired
+up, so the "unlock without the passphrase" path is simply not offered — the application knows it has no
+store and does not pretend otherwise. See
+[docs/unlocking-without-the-passphrase.md](docs/unlocking-without-the-passphrase.md).
+
+**It needs WebKitGTK, because the terminal is a WebView.** Specifically `webkit2gtk4.1`, which `dnf` pulls
+in for you. Fedora 44 is the distribution the head has actually been run on. RHEL 9 and its rebuilds ship
+the older 4.0 API line under a different library name and the package deliberately does not claim them —
+`dnf` will refuse with *nothing provides libwebkit2gtk-4.1.so.0*, which is a better answer than installing
+and drawing a blank terminal. This project does not ship desktop builds nobody has run, on any platform.
+
+**Where things go.** The application at `/opt/DodoSSH`, launched as `dodossh` or from your menu; your vault
+cache at `$XDG_DATA_HOME/dodossh`, usually `~/.local/share/dodossh`. Two different places on purpose:
+`dnf remove` takes the first and never touches the second, so reinstalling asks for your passphrase rather
+than starting over. Use **Sign out** inside the application to make the machine genuinely forget.
+
 Cutting a release is `scripts/release-windows.ps1`, run by a person on a Windows machine, and
 `scripts/release-macos.sh` on a Mac. Deliberately not a CI job; ADR 0013 decision 3 explains why, and it is
 not only that the runners are Linux.
@@ -189,6 +226,18 @@ Nightly*, its own install directory, and its own profile at `%LOCALAPPDATA%\Dodo
 costs nothing you are relying on. It signs in separately and appears to your account as a new device,
 because it genuinely is a second installation.
 
+**The Linux `.rpm` is on the same release**, built from the same commit and versioned the same way, as
+`dodossh-nightly`. It installs beside a release package for the same reasons and by the same four
+separations — a different package name, a tree at `/opt/DodoSSH.Nightly`, a `dodossh-nightly` launcher with
+its own menu entry, and a profile at `~/.local/share/dodossh.nightly`. Two RPMs owning different paths
+cannot replace one another, so `dnf` will keep both rather than treating one as an upgrade of the other.
+
+It is the only Linux package this project publishes at all today: there is no `v*`-tagged Linux release
+yet, because no person has walked a Linux build through
+[docs/manual-checks.md](docs/manual-checks.md). What CI proves on every push to `main` is that the release
+package still *builds* — the same arrangement Windows and macOS have had since the beginning, where the
+package is built on every commit and uploaded nowhere.
+
 **Installing it means trusting everyone who can write a release on this repository, including CI.** The
 updater applies what the feed serves without verifying a signature, so anyone who can change a workflow
 file here can put a build on every nightly machine. That is an acceptable trade for a build you are trying
@@ -920,10 +969,21 @@ keychain plus a terminal — and the spike that gates all of it.
   [ADR 0013](docs/adr/0013-desktop-distribution-and-updates.md) decision 10 and
   [Installing on macOS](#installing-on-macos).
 
+  **The Linux half is a package rather than an updater.** An `.rpm` for x86_64, built and checked on every
+  push to `main` and published to the nightly release, installing to `/opt` with a menu entry and a `dodossh`
+  launcher. It carries no self-updater at all and contacts no update service — on this platform `dnf` is
+  already an updater the user controls, and a second one answering somewhere else is the capability the
+  trust model exists to keep out of reach. It also has no hardware-backed device key store, so the
+  passphrase is asked for every unlock. See
+  [ADR 0013](docs/adr/0013-desktop-distribution-and-updates.md) decision 11 and
+  [Installing on Linux](#installing-on-linux).
+
   Still to do here: Windows signing (the first Windows release is unsigned, and the trigger for buying a
-  certificate is the first release aimed at strangers), macOS on Intel, Linux packaging, and Phase 18 of the
-  manual checks — the macOS build has never actually run, because there is no macOS runner in CI and
-  everything above is verified only as far as the bundle.
+  certificate is the first release aimed at strangers), macOS on Intel, a `v*`-tagged Linux release and a
+  package repository to serve it from, a Linux device key store, and Phases 18 and 19 of the manual
+  checks — neither the macOS nor the Linux build has been walked through by a person. There is no macOS
+  runner in CI at all, and the Linux package is verified only as far as what it *says* about itself: CI
+  builds it and interrogates its dependencies, its file list and its modes, and installs nothing.
 - **M5 — multi-provider OIDC**, identity key rotation, per-item content keys.
 
 ## Licence