Colour the window's frame, inset Hosts like its neighbours, drop Pins

Three things one pass over the shell's chrome turned up, none of them related
to the others beyond having been looked at together.

◆ A PALE STRIP ACROSS THE TOP OF THE WINDOW ON WINDOWS, and it is not this
application's titlebar. Avalonia's Win32 backend gives a BorderOnly window
WS_BORDER | WS_THICKFRAME and then calls DwmExtendFrameIntoClientArea with
one-pixel margins on all four sides — read out of WindowImpl.UpdateWindowProperties
in 12.1.1 rather than guessed at. So DWM owns a hairline of every edge and fills
it with the system's caption and border colours, which follow the user's
personalisation settings: with "show accent colour on title bars and window
borders" on, that is blue against a near-black shell. Nothing in the visual tree
painted those pixels, which is why nothing in the visual tree could cover them.

NativeWindowFrame sets DWMWA_BORDER_COLOR and DWMWA_CAPTION_COLOR to the
window's own Background, so the hairline still exists — the resize grip is on
it, the drop shadow hangs off it — and cannot be seen. Deliberately not
DWMWA_COLOR_NONE, which removes the border outright and leaves a near-black
window with no edge at all on a dark desktop. Windows 10 gets the dark-mode
attribute and nothing else, because the two colour attributes are Windows 11
and DwmSetWindowAttribute simply answers E_INVALIDARG there.

Called from OnOpened, not the constructor: there is no platform handle until
the window is shown, and calling early is a silent no-op — which looks exactly
like a fix that does not work.

Verified on screen on Windows 11.

◆ THE HOSTS HEADER SAT A STEP LEFT OF AND ABOVE EVERY OTHER SCREEN'S. Keychain,
Snips, Logs and Pins all frame their content with Margin="26"; Hosts was on 16
a side and 20 on top. It is 26 all round now, stated per row rather than once on
the root, because the board's ScrollViewer is deliberately full-bleed so that
its scrollbar rides the pane's edge, and because a root margin would also inset
the drawer, which draws its own.

That cost the cards ten pixels, and the layout suite is what said so:
TheHostsGridKeepsTwoColumnsAtTheMinimumWithTheDrawerOpen failed, because
Border.tile's 224 was derived from the board's old 16-pixel margins and the grid
quietly collapses to one column at exactly the size this application guarantees.
224 becomes 214, with the arithmetic in App.axaml rewritten — it had also gone
stale in a way that hid itself, still citing the 1016 minimum and 190 rail from
before v5b, whose two changes happened to cancel.

◆ PINS LEAVES THE RAIL, and only the rail. KnownHostsScreen is still built and
still one click away, from "Host keys" on the Keys screen's own header, which
was always the second way in. The row was kept through v5b on the grounds that
the mock has no screen for approved host keys — a reason for the screen to
exist, and never a reason for a rail entry once the keychain had a door to the
same place. Two rows landing on one screen is a rail that has to be read twice.
MainWindowViewModel.IsKnownHostsShowing stays: it names a real shell state and
ShellFlowTests still asserts on it.

design-import-gaps.md recorded that row as a deliberate deviation and
manual-checks.md Phase 1.1 walked the rail entry by entry; both are corrected,
and the manual check now reaches the screen the way a user would.

The layout suite's rail row count moves from six to five with it.

153 layout tests and 446 shell tests pass. The frame is confirmed by eye; the
Hosts inset and the rail are covered by the layout suite but were not seen
running, because the instance launched to check them came up locked.

src/DodoSSH.Client.App/App.axaml

@@ -913,18 +913,30 @@
       into a grid: equal columns, and a card that grew a third line of tags is taller than its neighbours
       rather than narrower.
 
-      ◆ 224 IS DERIVED, and the arithmetic is written out because getting it wrong is invisible. The grid's
-      column at the window's minimum is 1016 less the rail's 190 and the drawer's 320, which is 506. The
-      scrolling stack inside it takes 16 of margin on each side, and the vertical scrollbar takes its own —
-      call the usable width 474. A WrapPanel fits floor(474 / (Width + 10)) per row, so two columns needs
-      Width no more than 227.
+      ◆ 214 IS DERIVED, and the arithmetic is written out because getting it wrong is invisible. The grid's
+      column at the window's minimum is 1081 less the rail's 255 and the drawer's 320, which is 506. The
+      scrolling stack inside it takes 26 of margin on each side, and the vertical scrollbar takes its own —
+      call the usable width 454. A WrapPanel fits floor(454 / (Width + 10)) per row, so two columns needs
+      Width no more than 217, and 214 is that with the same few pixels of slack the previous number kept.
 
-      The first number here was 248, from the same reasoning with the two margins left out. It laid out
-      cleanly and the layout harness passed it, because the harness asks whether a control is inside the
-      window and not how many of them fit on a line — so the grid quietly became one column wide at exactly
-      the size this application guarantees, which is the shape the cards exist to avoid. The second was 232,
-      derived the same way against the drawer's own 304; v5 widened the drawer to 320 for the ADDRESS field's
-      breathing room, which narrowed the budget this number is drawn from and had to move it down in step.
+      Every number here has moved at least once, and always because something beside the cards did:
+
+      · 248, from this reasoning with the two margins left out. It laid out cleanly and the layout harness
+        passed it, because the harness asks whether a control is inside the window and not how many of them
+        fit on a line — so the grid quietly became one column wide at exactly the size this application
+        guarantees, which is the shape the cards exist to avoid.
+      · 232, derived against the drawer's own 304, which v5 widened to 320 for the ADDRESS field's breathing
+        room — narrowing the budget this number is drawn from and moving it down in step.
+      · 224, which is what that gave. The stated arithmetic still said 1016 and 190 by then: v5b's rail took
+        190 to 255 and the window's minimum 1016 to 1081 in the same pass, so the two changes cancelled and
+        the answer stayed right while the working went stale.
+      · 214, now that HostsScreen's board is inset 26 a side rather than 16 — see that file's own remark on
+        why every screen frames its content the same way. Twenty pixels of board is twenty pixels the cards
+        no longer have, and this is where they come from.
+
+      ◆ THE TEST THAT CATCHES THIS IS NOT THE HARNESS. See
+      ScreenLayoutTests.TheHostsGridKeepsTwoColumnsAtTheMinimumWithTheDrawerOpen, which counts columns
+      because that is the thing this number exists to buy and the thing no fit assertion can see.
     -->
     <Style Selector="Border.tile">
       <Setter Property="Background" Value="{StaticResource Raised}" />
@@ -932,7 +944,7 @@
       <Setter Property="BorderThickness" Value="1" />
       <Setter Property="CornerRadius" Value="12" />
       <Setter Property="Padding" Value="12,10" />
-      <Setter Property="Width" Value="224" />
+      <Setter Property="Width" Value="214" />
       <Setter Property="Margin" Value="0,0,10,10" />
     </Style>
     <Style Selector="ListBoxItem:pointerover Border.tile">