4 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
jaap-jan	4d1f07f253	Replay the live sessions to a renderer that just attached ... Each live session gets its credit window reset — the unacknowledged bytes died with the old page, and their acknowledgement is never coming — and its SessionOpened frame again, flagged as a replay so the page can tell a reattach from a genuinely new session. A session whose shell already ended gets nothing: its scrollback lived only in the page that is gone, and a frame implying otherwise would lie. RendererReattached is the seam for what the workspace has no business owning: the font size and the selected tab live in the shell, which re-pushes them from its own subscription.	2026-08-09 10:54:29 +02:00
jaap-jan	8209f15741	Let a session's transport say what it negotiated ... ISshConnection and ISftpSession both carry Cipher now — the server-to-client algorithm off SSH.NET's own ConnectionInfo, captured once because a rekey is not an event that library raises — and TerminalWorkspace.GetSessionFacts hands that plus the host key's algorithm back per session, without ever handing over the connection itself. Nothing reads either yet; the status bar that will is the next commit.	2026-08-08 20:54:14 +02:00
jaap-jan	5a899afd78	Decide what Lock does to a running shell, and say it ... Pressing Lock nulled and disposed the vault view model and touched nothing else. TerminalWorkspace is injected from App.axaml.cs and outlives every lock, so the SSH connection, the pty and the pump all kept running while the window said "Unlock your vault" — and since 0500e43 collapsed the WebView while locked, that live session was invisible as well as unstopped. CloseSessionAsync was reachable in production only from DisposeAsync, i.e. shutdown. None of this was written down anywhere, so it was neither a policy nor a bug, which is the actual problem. Shells now deliberately outlive the lock, and every layer says so. The reason to prefer this over making Lock a disconnect: locking is what a person does when they walk away from the machine, which is exactly when a long upgrade, build or transfer is most likely to be in flight. Ending every shell would make Lock a button that destroys work, and the predictable response is to stop pressing it and leave the vault open instead. The idle auto-lock this will grow decides it outright — an unattended timeout that killed a running job would be worse than the exposure it removes. Closing the channel also buys less than it looks: the session was authorised at connect time by a credential the remote verified itself, and no vault key participates in keeping it alive, so locking cannot retroactively un-authorise it any more than removing a member can. Stated honestly rather than implied, because the lock screen is what hides it: - The unlock screen shows how many shells are still connected, and that locking closes the vault and not the connections — so a machine still holding authenticated SSH channels does not present itself as merely "locked". Shown only when there is something to disclose. Quitting is what ends them, and the text admits that. - The Lock button carries the same thing in a tooltip, since its name implies the opposite of what it does to a shell. - README lists it as a third architecture consequence beside non-retroactive revocation, which is the same shape of honest limit; docs/crypto.md §10 records it as a threat-model boundary; TerminalWorkspace and LockAsync carry the argument next to the code. LiveSessionCount deliberately does not count dictionary entries. Nothing removes a session when the remote closes the channel by itself — RunSessionAsync only drops the renderer registration — so sessions.Count would report a shell that exited half an hour ago as still running, on the one screen where a user is deciding whether it is safe to walk away. A completed Run task is what "the shell is gone" actually looks like. While locked the number can only fall, since opening a session needs the vault, so a stale value over-reports rather than under-reports. Both new tests fail when the policy is reverted: the count test times out against sessions.Count, and the shell test reports "workspace.LiveSessionCount should be 1 but was 0" when Lock closes sessions. ShellFlowTests also stops building its workspace with a real SshNetConnectionFactory that nothing ever called, which had made the suite's independence from the network a coincidence rather than a property. Verified by hand with a live shell, which nothing had done: a harness mirroring MainWindow.axaml's 340,* grid with a real NativeWebView, the shipped WebAssets, a real sshd in a container, and an ISshShellSession decorator recording every window-change the remote is actually told about. Across lock and unlock, no window-change reached the remote at all, stty size answered 50 118 before and after, the renderer's own buffer came back byte for byte with the wrapped line intact, and the session stayed live throughout. A control run that never hides the WebView behaves identically, so nothing above is startup or idle behaviour. Keystrokes injected while locked reach nothing: twelve of twelve SendInput events accepted with the harness confirmed as the foreground window, no probe character in the remote's output, and a following Ctrl-U answered BEL, so nothing was queued in the line editor either. A hidden WS_CHILD window is not eligible for keyboard focus, which is what makes surviving the lock defensible rather than merely convenient. Correction to a claim made in f80b3d4: terminal.js's guard comment listed "a host that hides the WebView while the vault is locked" among the paths that reach a degenerate fit. It does not. Collapsing the control hides a native child window without resizing it, so the page still reports paneWidth 840 and paneHeight 760 with unchanged cols and rows, no ResizeObserver callback fires and the fit never runs. Establishing that rather than assuming it: the same cycle with MINIMUM_FITTABLE_PIXELS patched to 0 — the guard fully disabled — is equally clean. The guard is still right for minimising and for a splitter dragged to the edge; it is simply not what makes locking safe, and must not be cited as though it were. Recorded, not fixed: - Nothing closes one terminal from the interface, so a user reading "1 shell is still connected" can only act on it by quitting. CloseSessionAsync is tested and correct; VaultViewModel discards the session id it would need. - A session whose remote exits keeps its ISshConnection, and the thread ShellStream parks, until the process ends. - Suspected and seen once: before the harness waited for the window's scale to settle, a DPI settle pushed a 2202x1328 pane for a window 1180 logical units wide and a later re-push reflowed the wrapped line. Three later runs at RenderScaling 1.00 never showed it, so it is filed as a lead, not a finding. - WebView2 fails to initialise with CO_E_SERVER_EXEC_FAILURE when the host executable sits under a very long path. Cost an hour on the harness; relevant to packaging.	2026-07-29 14:44:02 +02:00
jaap-jan	eb354bcdd9	Add the SSH session layer and the terminal data plane ... The throughput harness the plan requires before any UI, plus the SSH plumbing under it. 94 new tests, no WebView involved. Credit-based flow control is what makes `yes` survivable. A terminal renders at 60 Hz at best while a remote produces output as fast as the network allows, and the difference has to accumulate somewhere or be refused. Credit is reserved *before* reading, never after: because the pump cannot read more than the renderer has room for, the coalescing buffer is bounded by the window rather than by how fast the remote can talk. When credit runs out the pump stops reading, SSH's own receive window closes, and the remote sshd blocks -- backpressure to the source with no custom protocol. Verified by falsification, not just by passing: with the credit gate removed three tests fail, including the throughput harness's bounded-memory assertion. Acknowledgements are clamped because they cross into JavaScript, where a buggy or hostile page could otherwise claim to have rendered a gigabyte and talk the host into an unbounded read. Host key trust is enforced by *failing* the connection rather than prompting inside the handshake. SSH.NET raises verification synchronously, so consulting the user there would block the handshake on a UI round trip and deadlock the first time the prompt needed the UI thread. Unknown host and changed key become distinct exceptions the caller resolves asynchronously. A mismatch has no retry path at all: a dialog offering to continue is how users are trained to click through the one warning that actually indicates interception. A legitimately rebuilt server is handled by removing the pin in settings, away from the moment of connecting. The data plane serves the renderer page from the same loopback listener as the socket, which makes Origin predictable -- always http://127.0.0.1:{port} -- where a WebView virtual-host mapping would give a different origin per backend and nothing to validate. The token is substituted at serve time, so it never touches disk and never appears in a URL. Being clear about what that buys: not protection from a process running as this user, which can read our memory anyway, but from a page in the user's browser attempting WebSocket connections to loopback ports, which is a real and routine thing. Two bugs the tests caught. The accept loop handled connections serially, so an upgraded WebSocket parked it inside the receive loop and every later request went unanswered -- the page's own script among them. The suite hung rather than failed, which is how I found it. And SHA-1 is unavoidable here: RFC 6455 mandates it for Sec-WebSocket-Accept, where it authenticates nothing. Suppressed narrowly with that reasoning; the alternative, HttpListener.AcceptWebSocketAsync, throws PlatformNotSupportedException off Windows.	2026-07-28 21:58:55 +02:00