2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
jaap-jan	0ffd259ccd	Give the rest of the button shapes their content alignment too ... The sweep the ghost/accent/danger fix implied: navuser, poprow, panechip, chiptoggle and choice each set VerticalContentAlignment now, because each set everything else about how its content sits and left that one to Avalonia's Stretch default. None of them was misbehaving. Every one is content-sized everywhere it is used today, so Stretch and Center agreed and this moves nothing — 113 buttons across 29 screens and cards measured byte-identical before and after, the strips that have no height of their own included. What it buys is that the day one of them is given a height, it is already right rather than quietly drawing its label in the top third. flat and cat are deliberately NOT swept in, and the reasoning that would sweep them is exactly the trap. flat carries the titlebar's search pill, a Border.searchpill with no height of its own that is meant to fill all 35 pixels of its button — the usage states HorizontalContentAlignment="Stretch" and takes the vertical default to match. cat carries the keychain rail's accent strip, a Border.rowmark whose style sets Width="2" and no height at all, "at full row height" by its own remark. Centring either from the style shrinks a pill and a strip that are correct today. AStretchingShapeStillFillsItsButton pins both, and fails when flat is centred. ButtonCaptionTests covers the five new shapes on the existing rule. Its stretch-fill assertion reads the content slot off the presenter rather than recomputing it from the button's Padding: the shapes differ in whether their presenter also draws a border, and a hand-rolled sum was two pixels out on Button.cat for that reason.	2026-08-10 10:20:26 +02:00
jaap-jan	21cf77f64a	Centre a button caption in the button, not just the button in its parent ... App.axaml's Button.ghost, Button.accent, Button.danger rule set VerticalAlignment and never VerticalContentAlignment. The first places the button in its parent; the second places the caption in the button, and its default is Stretch — so on any of these given a fixed Height the content presenter stretched the caption TextBlock to the whole content box, and a TextBlock draws its line at the top of whatever it is given. Measured on the hosts toolbar, whose three buttons are 40 pixels: nine above the ink and twenty below it. Every box was the height it declared, which is why this read as one of them being the wrong height — nothing was mis-sized, the labels sat in the top third. Center rather than a hand-tuned Padding, because the gap is the difference between the line box and the content box and moves with the font size: these carry 11.5 by default and the primary action overrides it to 13.5. It is the three shapes that were missed rather than a new idiom — navseg, sesstab, headerghost, sidebarrow, fieldrow and paneicon all state it already, as does every one of the phone head's own button classes. 134 buttons carry these three classes; the ones that show it are those with an explicit Height, which is both toolbars, the drawer's Save/Cancel pair, and the import screen. A button sized to its own caption was already right and is untouched. HorizontalContentAlignment is deliberately left alone: it is Stretch too and invisible on a self-sized button, and the flyout rows that are stretched wide ask for Left themselves. ButtonCaptionTests measures a bare Button, since Application.Styles is global and a screen-level test would pin one toolbar and leave the rest to the same defect. It measures the laid-out line rather than the TextBlock's arranged bounds, and that distinction is the test: under Stretch those bounds fill the content box and so are symmetrical whether or not the ink in them is. The first draft asserted on them and passed against the defect; the calibration test caught it, and against the old markup all three shapes now fail naming their own gap.	2026-08-09 08:02:15 +02:00