Commit Graph
6 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jaap-jan 27bb1deb5d Say what the docs describe, in the order they describe it
A tidy across docs/, and every change is either something that had drifted
from the code or something a reader would trip over. Nothing here is a rewrite:
the audit documents keep their audit-time text, because that is what the scope
was decided against, and corrections are marked in place the way each file
already marks them.

The one that matters is crypto.md. Section 4.3's resourceType table stopped at
13 while CryptoSpec.AadResourceType has carried ConnectionLogEntry = 14,
ActivityLogEntry = 15 and ObjectStore = 16 since the logs and the buckets
shipped — and items have been sealed under all three. That file is normative, so
a table three item kinds behind the code is the sort of gap somebody
reimplementing this would build against. Nothing on the wire or on disk changes;
the list now says what the code has been doing, and it notes the thing that
makes it worth reading carefully — 14, 15 and 16 are the first members that are
not a fixed offset from their SyncEntityType counterparts, because 12 and 13
closed a hole and pushed the two enums apart.

manual-checks.md had Phase 3 in an order nobody could follow: 3.2b, then 3.2a,
then 3.4a, then 3.3. The letters are not the problem — they exist so a check can
keep its number for life, which is what lets HostGridTests cite 7.6 and
platform-flags.md cite 3.6-3.8 — so the sections are reordered and the numbers
are untouched, and the intro now says the convention out loud rather than
leaving the next person to infer it from two orphaned letters. Phases 8 and 9
got the horizontal rule every other phase has. The Phase 3 preamble still said
"a sidebar that now draws headings", which has been two different interfaces for
a while: the desktop's grid of cards and the phone's flat list.

7.6 cited MovingAHostToAGroup_FilesItAndLeavesItSelected, which was renamed in
the commit before this one. Every other Type.Member citation across all six
files was checked against src/ and tests/ the same way; those two were the only
ones pointing at nothing.

design-import-gaps.md's v3 section described the grid of cards without saying it
holds one level, and its Groups row still said the sidebar emits one heading per
group — true of the phone and not of the desktop. The team-groups row said a
host a teammate filed "shows under UNGROUPED", which is now only half the story
and the interesting half is why: the chip resolves through groupsById, which is
every readable vault, while the level resolves through Groups, which is the
active vault alone — so the card sits at the outermost level with its group's
name still on it. Verified against both call sites rather than reasoned about.

android-port.md's destination inventory is the desktop as it stood when the
audit was taken and is deliberately left that way, with a note at its head
saying so and two inline corrections where a reader would otherwise be misled:
the rail lost FILES and S3 to fixed tabs, and the hosts sidebar became a grid —
which is exactly why the headings this head draws are the phone's alone now.

adding-hosts-on-the-phone.md is a plan marked built, so its two open questions
are answered in place: GroupId did get into the merge test's with block, and the
server test that asserts a plaintext ParentId is refused survived under a name
that says what it means. Its "found on the way" note is marked still open,
because it is: LocalCacheProtector.For has no arm for ConnectionLogEntry,
ActivityLogEntry or ObjectStore, so ConflictStore.Record still throws for all
three. That outlived the phases that shipped them, which is the drift a note
like that exists to prevent.

No code changed, so the suite is untouched at 1522 passing.
2026-08-04 10:15:02 +02:00
jaap-janandClaude Opus 5 16e0051e89 Draw the tags that have been storable and invisible since the domain landed
ci / build and test (push) Successful in 1m22s
ci / android head (push) Failing after 5s
ci / api image (push) Successful in 52s
`Tag` has been a full item kind for three commits — a table, a migration, a
codec, a merge, a cipher — and `HostSecret.TagIds` has merged per tag so two
people tagging one host both keep theirs. Nothing drew a chip. The tags a
client could store were ones nothing here could see.

Chips on host rows, both heads, from names resolved through the tag list rather
than ids: a tag that does not resolve is left out rather than drawn, because it
means the tag was deleted elsewhere or belongs to a vault this session cannot
read, and a host with one chip fewer is the honest answer where a host wearing
a GUID is not. The id stays on the host, so the chip comes back if the tag does.

The picker is chips that toggle, matching the chips on the row behind it. A
list of names to tick would make the user match an entry to a chip they can see
two inches away. The box under it creates a tag and puts it on straight away,
because that is when a tag is usually wanted — while tagging a host and finding
it does not exist yet. Unlike every other field in that editor it writes to the
keychain immediately, since a host can only name an id that exists; cancelling
therefore leaves the tag behind, which is honest rather than hidden. A name
that already exists is used rather than repeated: two tags called "staging" are
storable and must stay storable, because two people creating one offline is how
it happens, but typing it into a box beside a chip of the same name is a slip.

Renaming and deleting needed a home, or the picker fills with names nobody uses
and never empties. That home is a TAGS category on the keychain screen, where
every other item kind is managed — and renaming is the whole reason a tag is an
item rather than a string repeated inside twenty payloads: it is one write, and
no host is touched. The delete confirmation counts the hosts wearing it, which
is the difference between a tidy-up and losing a filter somebody relies on.

The desktop host editor now scrolls, and that is not a tidy-up. A picker's
height is a chip per tag in the keychain, wrapped, so somebody with fifteen
tags has an editor half again as tall as somebody with three; no fixed height
holds that, and trimming other fields to buy room only moves the failure to
whoever has sixteen. The layout suite caught it the moment its seeder grew tags
— which is why the seeder now creates ten rather than three, enough to drive
the pane onto its cap so the capped shape is what gets measured rather than one
no real keychain produces. The cost is named where it is paid: the harness
skips anything inside a ScrollViewer, so from here it certifies that pane fits
the column rather than that every field in it does.

Two smaller things fell out. Five buttons overflowed the keychain header by a
few pixels, so GENERATE lost the word KEY — its tooltip carries what the word
did. And TotalItemCount had been counting keys and credentials while ALL showed
four kinds; it counts all five now, because a number under a chip that
disagrees with the rows it opens is worse than no number.

An adversarial review of this change found two defects it had introduced, both
green against the full suite. NewTag filed into the "new items go to" picker
while the tag list only ever holds the active vault's — so with a team vault
selected a tag would be created, queued for push, reported as added, and then
invisible, with no row, no count, no picker entry and nothing able to rename or
delete it, because there is no active-vault switcher to go and find it with.
The comment on the host editor's own create path states that exact rule; this
was the one place that broke it, and NewObjectStore, whose list is likewise
active-vault-only, already ignored the picker. And the tag editor was the only
one of five that did not disarm a pending deletion when it opened, so arming a
key's deletion and then pressing + TAG left a live DELETE for an item the user
was no longer looking at, directly above the boxes they were typing into. Both
are fixed, both have a test, and the first was checked against the broken
version before being kept.

The same review caught a doc comment that had been inserted between
SnippetRowViewModel's summary and its declaration, silently taking it over.

Verified by the whole suite on a clean build: 1413 tests over nineteen
projects, none failing. Both heads build. The rectangles the layout suite
cannot reach are phase 9 of docs/manual-checks.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 12:42:43 +02:00
jaap-janandClaude Opus 5 4925dcf179 Give the phone the + it was promised, and the editors behind it
Steps 5 and 6 of docs/adding-hosts-on-the-phone.md, which finishes it. The
phone can now put things in a keychain rather than only read one.

The floating + arrives three designs after it was first asked for. It was
refused twice on the honest grounds that it would open an editor this head had
not got — and that stopped being true when steps 1 to 4 landed. It raises a
sheet rather than a form, because "add" on this screen has been two operations
since groups existed: a host, or a group to file hosts under.

Both editors are cards in the list's own row, swapped for the list rather than
stacked over it, following SnippetsScreen and for the reason written there: a
form on top of the list hides what it is about. There is still no dialog and no
editor screen anywhere on this head. The port and username boxes may be left
empty, and the greyed text inside each is what the host will actually use —
following the group picker as it moves, so the form says what leaving a box
blank will do rather than making it a guess.

The back gesture gains a guard above the switch rather than a case inside it.
An editor is not a screen and has no entry there, and it is strictly nearer:
the sheet sits over the editor's own screen, so back lowers whatever is topmost
before it considers moving between screens.

A group editor needs a way in, and the phone draws no groups panel — so the
heading in the host list gains a pencil. A + that adds groups with no way to
correct one is the same strange thing to ship as one that adds hosts with no
way to correct one, and worse: a group's defaults are what every host beneath
it falls back to.

Scouting step 6 turned up a bug worth more than the prose it was looking for.
ReloadGroupsAsync read the active vault alone, which was a cosmetic limitation
while a group carried only a name — a teammate's host showed under UNGROUPED
and nothing else was lost. Since a group began lending a port, a username and a
binding, the same omission silently dropped all three: that host would dial 22
as nobody while the machine is on 2222 as deploy, with nothing on screen saying
why. The resolution map now spans every readable vault. The editable list stays
narrow, because a row shown across vaults needs a vault id for rename and
delete and two vaults may hold groups with one name — but the map needs none of
that, since it is only ever asked what an id says.

An adversarial review of this change found something I had written a comment
denying. The + was a child of the outer Panel rather than of the list's row, so
it anchored to the bottom of the screen and sat squarely over the new EDIT
button and the lower edge of CONNECT — and because a Panel hit-tests its
last-declared child first, tapping the right end of EDIT would have raised the
add sheet. The comment beside it claimed it was in the list's row precisely so
that could not happen, and manual-checks 8.1 names that exact failure. It is in
Grid.Row 2 now. The same pass caught a connect bar that was disabled rather
than hidden while its own comment said hidden, a scrim that would have flashed
its default pressed chrome across the screen, a fab comment claiming an accent
fill no other button had when Button.primary has it, and a back-gesture remark
naming two view-model properties that do not exist anywhere in the repo.

That last one came from this plan, which invented IsVaultsSurface and
IsConnectionsSurface, and pointed step 6 at a ConnectionsScreen.axaml that has
never existed. Both are corrected in the plan rather than quietly worked
around, along with a fourth "groups are flat" site in README.md that step 1
missed.

The phone's rectangles are not measurable and structurally never will be: the
layout suite is net10.0, the Android head is net10.0-android, and Avalonia's
application is a one-shot process global — so a second head cannot share the
process even if the reference were possible. Everything the sheet and both
editors bind to is shared and is tested headlessly here; the pixels go to
docs/manual-checks.md phase 8, nine checks, which is where this project already
sends what it cannot assert.

Tags remain the one thing asked for that did not ship. Tag is a full item kind
and TagIds merges, encodes and resolves, but no screen draws a chip or offers
to add one, so the tags a client can store are ones nothing here can see. Both
editors carry the set through a save untouched so a client that can set them
does not lose them. Recorded as half-shipped in docs/design-import-gaps.md
rather than quietly left out.

Verified by the whole suite: 1402 tests over nineteen projects, none failing.
Both heads build. Nothing seen on a display — phase 8 is what that costs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 11:30:00 +02:00
jaap-janandClaude Opus 5 b7335743d9 Make a host take what its group lends it, everywhere it is read
Step 4 of docs/adding-hosts-on-the-phone.md. The domain could resolve a host
against its groups; nothing asked it to. This is the wiring, and it is mostly
one change repeated: read the resolved host, not the stored one.

TryBuildAuthentication and TryBuildConnectionRequest now take the resolved
value beside the stored one, which is where group context was being lost. It
is the only authentication resolution in the product — both heads and both
transports come through it — so a host inheriting its binding would otherwise
have been offered a password prompt on every screen at once. The
credential-username fallback becomes three levels, and Complete still refuses
an empty username, but now only after the chain has been walked; refusing
before it would refuse exactly the hosts inheritance exists to serve.

HostRowViewModel carries its ResolvedHost, resolved once when the list is
built. Address, Authentication and Dialled read it, so a row cannot disagree
with itself about what it dials — and MainWindowViewModel.Rank searches
Address, so a host inheriting 2222 that displayed 22 would have been
unfindable by the port it actually answers on.

HostsBoundTo counts over the resolved binding, which is the difference between
a warning and a silence: a key bound once on a group and inherited by twenty
hosts named nobody, would have been deleted, and would then have refused all
twenty at connect time.

HostFields.From is answered by a refusal rather than by threading a group list
through the sync engine. A relay host may not inherit its port. The reason is
stronger than the convenience: a plaintext column is a derived duplicate the
client supplies when it pushes *this* host, so an inherited port would make it
depend on another item — editing a group would change what the relay dials for
every host beneath it, except that nothing re-pushes those hosts, so the server
would keep dialling the old port until each was next touched for some unrelated
reason. A stale wire on the relay path connects the user to the wrong service.

The editor distinguishes unset from explicit in both directions. An empty port
box means "take the group's" and shows what that will be as a placeholder,
following the group picker as it moves — a pre-filled 2222 would have been
indistinguishable from one the user typed, and saving would have pinned it. The
authentication picker gains a fourth entry, offered only to a host in a group,
because for an ungrouped host it would behave exactly like the first.

Which found a real defect while the tests were being written. Filing an
ungrouped host into a group silently pinned it to a typed password: the picker
had no "Inherit" entry when it opened, so it sat on "Password (ask each time)",
and saving wrote that as a decision — the host would have been pinned to a
prompt nobody asked for and the group's key would never have reached it. Two
guards now: the picker is rebuilt when the group changes, and BuildHost writes
AsksForPassword only for a host that had the alternative on offer.

The group editor is here too, and the plan never assigned it a step. Without it
no group can carry a default, so every line above would have been unreachable.
It grows a parent picker that leaves out the group itself and everything
beneath it — a courtesy rather than the guarantee, since a cycle assembled from
two offline re-parents was never offered that list — and three defaults beside
the name, each of which may be left empty because "lend nothing" is an answer.

Tags are stored and not editable. TagIds merges, encodes and resolves; no
screen can set one yet, and the editor carries the set through a save untouched
so a client that can set them does not lose them to somebody editing a port.

Eight new tests, and they dial. That is the point of them: a resolved value
that never reaches SshConnectionRequest is a label, and every one of these
failures would be silent — a host connecting to the wrong port, or being asked
for a password it does not need, with nothing on screen admitting it.

Verified by the whole suite: 1390 tests over nineteen projects, none failing.
Both heads build. Nothing on the phone has changed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 10:41:28 +02:00
jaap-janandClaude Opus 5 8c04ba60b0 Build the three things the phone's + needs, before the + exists
Steps 1 to 3 of docs/adding-hosts-on-the-phone.md: the domain half. Nothing
on either head has changed, which is deliberate — the plan orders these first
because everything the editors will bind to has to exist and be merge-safe
before a screen can offer it.

HostGroupSecret gains a parent and four defaults, and the codec gains the
version rule it never had. It stamped CurrentSchemaVersion unconditionally,
which was harmless with one field and one version and stops being harmless
here: upgrading one machine and renaming any group would have made that group
uneditable on every machine still on the old build. It now emits the lowest
version that loses nothing, so a flat group with no defaults still encodes at
version 1, byte for byte, pinned against a literal.

Tags become a real item over the reserved slot. Secret, codec, merge, cipher,
repository, both registries, the EF entity and a generated AddTagItem
migration. TagCipher names AadResourceType.Tag as a constant rather than
casting the wire type, because Tag is 5 on the wire and 8 in the crypto enum
and 5 there is Credential — a cast would seal every tag under the resource
type for a password, encrypt and decrypt perfectly on the machine that wrote
it, and only fail when another implementation refused the item, by which time
the AAD is frozen into stored ciphertext. HostTag stays reserved and unused:
the one thing the join buys over a set on the host is bought instead by
merging TagIds per id.

HostSecret grows TagIds and Port goes nullable, which is the change with the
widest blast radius and the only one that loses an item rather than locking
one. A host with no port of its own omits the property, an older build reads
int Port as 0, and TryValidate refuses it — unreadable rather than read-only.
That cost is confined to hosts which actually inherit, because the version is
a maximum over the fields present; the alternative, writing 22 into every
host, is the lie inheritance exists to stop telling.

One decision the plan did not specify. "Three states where there were two" is
four — key, credential, typed password, or the group's answer — and two
nullable ids carry three. Naming neither id now means inherit, so
AsksForPassword says "a typed password even under a group that lends a key"
out loud. Only true is ever written and a decoded false folds back to null, so
a host that never touched it encodes as it always did. Nothing already stored
changed meaning: no group could lend a binding before this build, so every
existing host resolves exactly as it did.

HostInheritance is the resolver, and its visited set is load-bearing rather
than defensive. Two clients can each re-parent A under B and B under A while
offline; the merge sees one item against one item and the server sees
ciphertext, so nothing upstream can refuse the pair. With inheritance the
chain is walked at connect time, so an unguarded cycle is not an undrawable
sidebar — it is a shell that never opens. Stopping at the first repeat
degrades it to a group that reads as a root, and clearing the parent is the
repair.

A tag set turns out to be the one field on a host that can never ask the user
anything. TagSet.ToIdMap keys by the value, so no key can hold two values, so
the both-sides-moved-differently branch of the keyed merge is unreachable —
asserted over the whole eight-row matrix. The conflict loop is kept anyway,
because that proof is one edit from ceasing to hold and what it would cause is
a discarded tag nothing records.

Three guard tests failed by design and were fixed rather than relaxed: the
ordered pull filter, the AAD pinning table, and the server's refusal of a
plaintext parent — that last one survives with its reason rewritten, because
the refusal now means "the parent is not the server's to hold" rather than
"there is no such thing as a parent". The prose that said groups are flat is
rewritten in all four places it appeared, not deleted.

The five view-model sites that read Port directly now go through the resolver,
which is a down payment on step 4 rather than the whole of it. HostFields.From
still emits the stored port, and that is the one remaining place where an
unresolved read would be a wrong wire rather than a wrong label.

Verified by the whole suite: 1382 tests over nineteen projects, none failing.
Both heads build. Nothing seen on a display, because nothing on a display has
changed yet.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 10:21:02 +02:00
jaap-janandClaude Opus 5 9629b7d938 Write down how the phone will add hosts, before it adds any
ci / build and test (pull_request) Successful in 1m12s
ci / android head (pull_request) Failing after 5s
ci / api image (pull_request) Successful in 3s
The + button the design has asked for twice needs three things that do not
exist: a tag, a group's parent, and a group's defaults. Two of them are
refused on the record — HostGroupSecret argues groups are flat, and the
theme argues an unused style is a claim the control exists.

So the plan goes in first, with the decisions and the reasons. Tags become a
real item over the reserved slot, a host names them, and membership merges
through ThreeWayMerge.Map rather than as a whole value, so two people tagging
one host both keep theirs — which is what HostTag was going to buy. Group
defaults inherit rather than copy, shown as the field's placeholder, which is
what makes editing a group afterwards mean anything. A parent arrives with a
visited-set walk, because with inheritance a cycle is no longer an undrawable
sidebar — it is a shell that never opens.

Also written down: that Port has to go nullable and everything that touches,
the byte pin it will trip, and the schema-version branch whose absence would
make an inheriting host unreadable rather than read-only on every client that
has not been upgraded.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-02 22:07:30 +02:00