69bc9e270bdb970f51504d3832925a36d66d2386
5
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 jaap-jan
|
f86791e817 |
Finish revoking a device, instead of half of it
ForgetDeviceAsync stopped this machine unlocking without a passphrase and left
the server's row exactly where it was, so the account went on listing a device
nobody could account for. ADR 0007 recorded that as a deliberate gap needing an
endpoint. This is the endpoint, and the two things that turned up behind it.
DELETE /api/v1/me/devices/{id}. The device row is not the dangerous half: a
kind=device wrap is the user's identity bundle sealed to a key somebody may be
holding, and that is what has to go. It goes on the foreign key's cascade rather
than a second statement, and RevokeDevice_TakesItsWrapWithIt asserts the cascade
rather than trusting the configuration to keep saying so.
Scoped to the caller's own account, which is the only authorisation check there
is. The id is an unguessable v7 GUID, but unguessable is not a permission —
without the scope one user could withdraw another's device key by pasting an id
they saw once, and the victim's next launch would ask for a passphrase with no
explanation. 404 rather than 403 for somebody else's device, so a stranger does
not learn the id exists.
Never refused for being the last device. ADR 0001 makes an enrolled device a
recovery path, so removing the last one does cost the user something — but the
machine being revoked is most likely the one they have just lost, and a server
that argued about it would be refusing the one request that has to work
immediately. The passphrase wrap is untouched either way, which
RevokeDevice_LeavesThePassphraseWrapAlone pins.
--- Two things found on the way ---
Registering twice from one machine left two devices on the account. The server
is idempotent on the public key, but the client generates a fresh key pair every
call and the keystore holds one — so the second registration orphaned a wrap
whose private half had just been overwritten, which is precisely the leftover
this change exists to remove. Registering now withdraws the previous device.
Found by a test that asserted the property and failed.
And the fakes were lying about it. FakeAccountServer's comment claimed the real
service's idempotence while handing back a fresh Guid on every call, which is
invisible until something revokes by id — at which point a test would be
revoking an id the server never issued, and passing. Both fakes now issue one id
per public key and drop the wrap with the device, as the cascade does.
--- Reachable at all ---
ForgetDeviceAsync had exactly one caller and it was a test, so "Stop unlocking
here" now sits in the account bar where "Use Windows Hello here" was. Its own
flag rather than the negation of that one: a machine with no TPM and a machine
that is already registered are both "cannot register", and only the second has
anything to take back.
No confirmation prompt, deliberately. The cost of pressing it by accident is one
passphrase and one re-registration; the cost of a dialog is a moment's
hesitation at the point somebody has realised a machine is in the wrong hands.
Offline it does the local half and says so rather than refusing. Whether this
machine may unlock itself is decided entirely by the local cache and the local
keystore — the unlock path never asks the server — so forgetting here is what
actually revokes, and "you are offline, so this machine will go on unlocking
itself" would be the worst available answer. DeviceRevocation.LocalOnly is what
the interface reports and the status line explains what is left to do.
The local half runs first for the same reason, and the keystore call is the
first thing in the method that can yield: on Windows it raises a consent dialog,
and a dialog wants the thread it was called from. That ordering is currently
load-bearing and shakier than it looks — see the open device-unlock hang.
Four mutations, all caught: dropping the user scope from the server query
(1 test), skipping the stale-device revoke on re-registration (2), skipping the
server call in ForgetDeviceAsync (2), and the earlier version of the client that
never called it at all.
930 tests green across 16 projects, 13 of them new. Zero warnings, format clean.
|
||
|
jaap-jan
|
db4a8ed3d3 |
Let an already-enrolled account register a device key
The first of the three pieces ADR 0007 needs, and the one that was a discovery rather than a plan. EnrollmentService.AddDevice runs only during enrollment, so without an endpoint the device-unlock feature would have reached accounts created after it shipped and no others — which is to say none of the ones that exist. The code even said so: "the devices endpoint sets it properly when it lands." POST /api/v1/me/devices takes a name, an X25519 public key and the bundle sealed to it, and writes a device row plus a UserKeyWrapKind.Device wrap. Possession is proved by construction, so there is no challenge. The wrap is the secret bundle sealed to the supplied public key, and only something that has opened that bundle can produce it. A caller who seals the wrong bytes registers a device that cannot unlock, which harms nobody else; the server cannot tell the difference and must not pretend to, because it holds no key that opens either. That is also why the client must be unlocked to call this at all. It is the one endpoint in the /me group that requires enrollment, and it says so itself rather than relying on the group. The group deliberately does not: GET / and POST /enrollment are how a client discovers it needs to enroll and then does so, and gating those on enrollment would make enrollment unreachable. Adding the stricter policy to this route alone means an unenrolled caller is told "enrollment-required" by the authorization handler rather than getting a 400 about the shape of a request that was fine. Idempotent on the public key, and 200 rather than 201 for the reason enrollment gives: a retry of an identical request returns the same body, so there is no single moment of creation to point a Location header at. A second row for one key would mean a device list with a duplicate in it and two wraps to revoke instead of one. Mutation tested — removing the lookup fails RegisterDevice_TwiceWithTheSameKey_ReturnsTheSameDeviceAndAddsNoSecondWrap and nothing else. That test also found a real defect, in the way these usually surface: two timestamps that print identically and are not equal. TimeProvider reports 100-nanosecond ticks and PostgreSQL's timestamp with time zone keeps microseconds, so the first call returned a value that no later read of the row would ever produce, and the idempotent retry answered with a different timestamp for the same device. Nothing breaks, which is what makes it worth fixing: the service now truncates to the precision the column actually holds, so the response is the same value every time it is asked for. The repo already had a precedent for this class of thing in KeyLogChain.TruncateTimestamp; it just had not been applied here. The platform is deliberately not carried on the wire, which leaves Device.Platform unreported and the stale comment corrected rather than fulfilled. It would be a display-only field, and a Contracts enum mirroring the domain's DevicePlatform is exactly the shape of duplication that has produced three self-consistent bugs in this repository. A device list that wants it can add a mapping table and a test pinning the two together, which is what the sync entity types already do. Its own problem code and exception rather than reusing enrollment's, whose rules it largely shares. Registering a device is not enrolling, and a client showing "your enrollment was rejected" because somebody set up a fingerprint reader would be describing the wrong thing. The validation shares the limit constants — MaximumWrapBytes, MaximumDeviceNameLength, PublicKeySize — and not the four-line guards, which would have had to be parameterised over which exception to throw for less than they cost. Both in-memory fakes implement it properly rather than throwing: they record the wrap so a test can assert it arrived, and refuse before enrollment as the real endpoint's policy does. A fake that answered where the server refuses is a fake that can make a real bug pass. 866 tests green, 8 of them new. Zero warnings, dotnet format clean. Still to come: the protector seam with the wrap cached locally so device unlock works offline, then the Windows Hello implementation and the unlock-screen UI — which is where the Windows target framework lands and where automated testing stops. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
1d262b7ccc |
Run M1's end-to-end slice, and fix the two bugs it found
The whole vertical slice now runs against a real Keycloak, a real API, a real PostgreSQL and a real sshd: sign in through the browser flow, enroll with the identity-provider key binding, unlock, create a host, sync it, read it back on a second machine, unlock again with no network, accept an unseen host key, and open an interactive shell. Opt-in, because it needs the development stack; skipped with a message naming the commands. It found two bugs on its first run, and both are the same class: two sides of a stub agreeing with each other about something the specification never said. **The API never applied DodoSshJsonContext to its HTTP JSON options.** Minimal APIs therefore used the framework's web defaults, which write an enum as a number. Every request DTO carrying one failed to bind against a client writing the specified string form — which is the entire sync surface, unreachable from the real client, with a 400 naming only the parameter. The documented guarantee that request bodies reject unmapped members was likewise not in effect anywhere. Nothing caught it because the API tests posted with PostAsJsonAsync's defaults, so they and the server had independently settled on integers. Those tests now serialise through the contract, which is the deeper fix: removing the new configuration fails 13 of them. Copying settings into options a host owns is itself the hazard the context warns about, so ApplyTo lives beside the settings it mirrors and ApplyToTests pins the transformation, including that inserting the resolver leaves the caller's own in place. **The realm registered a loopback redirect URI Keycloak rejects.** `http://127.0.0.1:*/callback` looks more explicit than the RFC 8252 form and is broken: Keycloak's wildcards are trailing-only, so the `*` parses as a literal port and every authorization request came back "Invalid parameter: redirect_uri". Providers ignore the port for loopback hosts, which is the whole mechanism, so the correct registration is `http://127.0.0.1/callback` — path pinned, port free. The value the server advertises through the discovery document said the same wrong thing and now says the right one. Two smaller things, both documented in docs/platform-flags.md: - --import-realm skips a realm that already exists, so editing the realm file and restarting Keycloak changes nothing and serves stale configuration. The container has to be recreated. The compose comment claimed the opposite. - Keycloak marks its session cookies Secure even over plain HTTP, because SameSite=None requires it. A spec-conformant client drops them and the login POST answers 400 with no message; browsers complete the flow only because they exempt loopback. Harmless for the product, fatal for automation, so ScriptedBrowser carries the cookies by hand and says why. Also: the server enforces a 64 MiB floor on the passphrase KDF, so this suite cannot use the 8 MiB profile the other client suites take for speed. Those only get away with it because their in-memory servers have no policy — worth knowing rather than rediscovering. 638 tests. The solution-wide run stays green with the stack down: exit code 8 means "no tests ran", which the platform reports as failure, so the opt-in project ignores exactly that code. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
8d2416a602 |
Add the encrypted local cache and the sync client
Three new client projects, and the wire-contract fix they needed. DodoSSH.Client.Domain holds the decrypted item model and the three-way merge, with no I/O at all — so the suite that decides whether a credential can be lost runs in milliseconds with nothing to mock. Scalars defer to the server on a genuine clash so every replica resolves the same triple identically and two clients cannot ping-pong; directives merge per name so two people each adding one both keep theirs; the jump chain merges as a whole value because its order is the route. Whatever loses is returned rather than dropped. DodoSSH.Client.Storage is EF Core on SQLite, no SQLCipher: the rows are already ciphertext, so an encrypted file would protect protected bytes at the cost of a native dependency. It keeps the server's state and the outbox in separate tables, which is what preserves the common ancestor a merge needs. One pending operation per item, enforced by a unique index. DodoSSH.Client.Sync is the pull/apply/push loop. Pulling never decrypts — a change with no local work pending is plumbed as ciphertext — so a first sync of thousands of items does not run twice as many AEAD operations for nothing. Contracts: EncryptedPayload gains WrappedDataKey and DataKeyId. The specification has required a per-item data key since crypto.md §3, the columns have existed since the first migration and DshAad.ItemPayload binds the id, but this record had nowhere to put either — so a spec-compliant item could not be transmitted at all. Found by writing the client that has to produce one. Also closes a hole in AadResourceType, which had no value for the HostTag and HostCredential that SyncEntityType has always listed. Four bugs the tests found, not review: - SQLite refuses to order or compare its own DateTimeOffset mapping, and throws at execution rather than model build. Collecting tombstones and listing conflicts are both that shape, so this was a crash waiting for the first user with a deleted host. Timestamps are integers now, by convention so a later field cannot be the one left unconverted. - SQLitePCLRaw 2.1.11, which EF resolves, is covered by GHSA-2m69-gcr7-jv3q. Pinned forward as a family. - Resurrecting content from a remote deletion cleared the original before queueing the copy. Two transactions, so a crash between them lost the work; reversed, and the rescued id is derived from the tombstone so a replay coalesces instead of duplicating. - Several equality assertions went through Shouldly's ShouldBe, which compares IEnumerable element-wise and so tested nothing about the Equals these types exist to provide. Corrected; the falsification that caught it went from 2 failures to 6. The push response's cursor is deliberately ignored. It sits after this client's own writes, so adopting it skips anything another client committed at a lower sequence in the window between a pull and a push — permanently. Re-reading one's own writes is idempotent and costs a page. The Contracts doc that invited the shortcut now says so. 593 tests, up from 448. The delete-versus-edit rules, the ancestor retention, the fresh operation id on coalesce and the cursor safeguard were each verified by breaking them and watching the right test fail. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
a628762cd1 |
Add /me and enrollment with the identity-provider key binding (M1)
The last backend piece of M1. A client can now log in, discover it must enroll, publish its identity key, and get a usable personal vault. Enrollment is one indivisible act. One transaction writes the key, its wraps, the device, the key log entry, the vault and the vault key grant, because none of them is useful alone: a key with no vault leaves a user unable to store anything, and a vault with no grant is a container nobody can ever open -- including its owner, since only the client can wrap the key and it has already moved on. Two independent checks run, and neither substitutes for the other. The Ed25519 self-signature proves possession of the private key. The identity-provider binding proves whose key it is: the client hashed its statement, used the hash as an OIDC nonce, and the resulting ID token is the provider's signature over exactly those public keys. This server cannot mint that signature, so it cannot invent a key for a user who never enrolled -- which is the attack that would otherwise let an operator read every vault by publishing its own key as yours. The binding token is stored verbatim, not just summarised. Clients must repeat the check against the provider's JWKS fetched directly, and storing only our conclusion would ask them to trust the server about the one question the design exists to avoid trusting it about. Key log appends take a deployment-wide advisory lock. The falsification matters more than the passing test: with the lock removed, Enroll_ConcurrentEnrollmentsByDifferentUsers_LeaveAnUnbrokenChain fails with entry 11 linked to the wrong predecessor. Different users trip no unique index, so without serialising they all read the same head and the chain forks -- indistinguishable from the key substitution the log exists to make detectable, and permanent, because the log is append-only. Enrollment is idempotent. Vault ids and keys are client-chosen, so a client whose response was lost re-sends the identical body and gets the identical result. Without that, a lost response leaves a user enrolled against a vault they never learned the id of. Contract change, breaking the v0.1 freeze deliberately. EnrollmentRequest had DevicePublicKey but no wrap to go with it, which is unsatisfiable: only the holder of the secret bundle can seal it, so the server could never fill the gap. Added DeviceWrappedPrivateKey, and PersonalVault so enrollment can be atomic rather than leaving an unopenable vault behind two endpoints that do not exist yet. No client exists and no package is published, which is exactly when PublicAPI.Unshipped.txt expects this. Sync now requires the Enrolled policy, which until now was a stub whose name promised a check it never made. The sync denial tests use enrolled intruders instead of unenrolled ones -- an unenrolled caller is stopped before the vault check runs, which would have left those tests passing without exercising the thing they exist to prove. Also fixed: omitting kdfParameters from the JSON body was a 500. A record's non-nullable parameters are a compile-time promise, not a runtime one. 268 tests pass, zero warnings on a clean rebuild, format clean. |