44 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
jaap-jan	808a9a7fc1	Open a new host in the vault of the group it is being made in ... + NEW HOST decided two defaults separately and let them contradict each other. The group came from the screen — the selected card, or failing that the group whose contents are showing — and the vault came from the keychain screen's standing "new items go to" preference. Inside a group belonging to any other vault the two disagreed, and the group is what lost: GroupInEditingVault drops a group the editor's vault has not got, on the sound reasoning that a host filed under an id its readers cannot resolve looks unfiled to everybody but the person who wrote it. So pressing the button while standing inside a team's PLATFORM opened a form filed under nothing, bound for the personal vault, with no sentence anywhere saying either thing had happened. The vault now follows the group. A group lives in exactly one vault, so a host that is to land in that group has to be sealed in that vault too — which is the rule + NEW GROUP has followed for a parent since the cards became a tree, and the comment there claiming this as a deliberate difference from the host's editor is the one the code has now caught up with. The filter stays, because there is one case left for it: the group's vault may be one this session can read and not write, a team vault this account is a viewer of. TargetVaults is the readable-and-writable set and is what decides here, so a viewer keeps the standing preference and loses the group with it, rather than opening an editor aimed at a save that cannot happen. Both directions are tested, since one alone would not say which default wins: standing in a shared vault's group, the editor opens on that vault with the group selected and the host saves there; and with the preference pointed at the shared vault while a personal-vault group is open, the group beats the picker somebody set once.	2026-08-06 12:08:15 +02:00
jaap-jan	f1d6499bb5	Merge branch 'main' ... Two of main's changes land in files this branch rewrote, and both needed carrying across by hand rather than by the merge. The phone's nav staying up on Connections with nothing running is a fourth input to RefreshChrome, which this branch had already given two more — whether hosts are ticked and whether the host editor is filling the screen. They compose: the rail and the bottom bar now ask (pages || connectPage) && !editing, so a page-shaped terminal surface keeps its way off the screen and the editor still takes the whole display. The key question under the host's move panel is the harder one, because this branch deleted the panel it was added to. The connect card is gone and the phone's only route to a move is the action bar, so leaving the merge to take this side would have removed a capability main had just shipped — silently, since nothing would fail to build. It is asked in the action bar's own picker instead, in two shapes fewer than the desktop's: one host, because which key to carry is a fact about one machine and a selection of six has six answers, and a move rather than a copy, because taking the key out from under an original that is staying put would leave that original unable to connect. BindingOfTheMovingHost splits into MovableBindingOf so both heads answer it the same way from different panels. Main also fixed a real trap in the same commit — a host that only inherited its key from its group arrived in the destination naming nothing at all, because the group stays behind — and the batch move had the same bug for the same reason. It goes through Detached now, which is where that fix lives. The carried host is written as the carry left it rather than being detached again, which is the one thing worth measuring: the key takes a new id over there, so a run that rebuilt the payload from the row would send the machine across naming a tombstone. Both directions are pinned, along with the rule about which shapes the question is asked in at all.	2026-08-06 09:30:00 +02:00
jaap-jan	c882fa0cd3	Give the phone a selection instead of a card under the list ... A long press on a host raised a connect card over the bottom of the list: a password box, CONNECT, EDIT, MOVE and DELETE. It was the right idea in the wrong place. It covered rows, it had room for five things and never a sixth, and every one of them was about exactly one machine — so filing eleven imported hosts under a group was eleven trips through a form, and there was nowhere to put a sixth action if anybody wanted one. A long press now chooses the host it landed on, and the actions move into a bar across the top of the screen, in the vault header's place rather than beside it. That is where Android has put them since contextual action bars existed, and it is the one strip a list can never grow into — but the real reason for it is that while it is up the screen is unambiguously about the ticked hosts and nothing else, which is what lets the count in the middle of it mean something. Left to right: the cross that leaves the mode, the count, the pencil, and a ⋯ holding Connect, Connect via SFTP, Move to vault, Copy to vault, Change group, Duplicate and Remove. A tap still connects and still raises nothing. Once anything is ticked it ticks and unticks instead, which is what every Android list does and is not merely a convention worth following: a tap that connected while five machines sat ticked would open a terminal on top of a selection somebody was halfway through building. Unticking the last host leaves the mode, so there are two ways out of it and the cross is only one of them. Both gestures now read the row from the element under the finger rather than from the list's selection, and that is a correctness change rather than tidying. A tap on a group heading moves the selection and the view model bounces it straight back to whichever host was chosen before — which answered "a host, or nothing" for free while a tap only ever connected. It stops answering it the moment a tap can tick one: the heading would tick a machine the user was not pointing at, into a set they are about to delete. Three of the seven entries are about one machine and are drawn only for one. A terminal, a file-transfer session and a form each have no reading over six, so they are collapsed rather than refused. The other four read better for a count than without one — it is the reason the set exists — and each of them says afterwards how many hosts it wrote and how many it left alone. Skipping beats refusing the whole run: a selection of eleven with one read-only row would otherwise do nothing at all and then report about the wrong ten. Copy to vault and Duplicate are new, and the difference between them is what each can safely carry. A copy crosses a key boundary, so it drops the group and the tags exactly as a move does — both are items of the vault being left, and a host arriving with either would point at something the destination does not contain, resolvable on the machine that sent it and dangling for everybody else. A duplicate stays in the same keychain, so everything it points at is still there and it keeps both. Change group is the write dragging a card onto a group already makes on the desktop, run over a selection; it refuses one spanning two keychains rather than half-filing it, which is the refusal a drop across that boundary already makes one host at a time. Connect via SFTP is the one action that leaves the vault. Which machine is a decrypted item and so is this object's business; the screen it leads to and the transfers view model behind it are the shell's — so it is an event, on the same division SessionOpened already draws for a shell. The host is re-found in that screen's own copy of the list, because the picker binds to rows in that copy and handing it the vault's object would select nothing. What is left of the card is the password box, and only because it had nowhere else to go: a host that authenticates with a typed password cannot be reached by a tap alone. That tap now raises a sheet rather than the bar, and the difference is that a sheet is up only while a question is on screen — the bar was raised by a long press and stayed, so it was a password box sitting over the list whether or not anything was being asked. Dismissing it empties the box, which is not tidiness either: a secret left behind would satisfy the emptiness check that decides whether to raise the sheet at all, so the next tap would dial with somebody else's password. The pencil moving into that bar takes the host editor with it. It was a card in the list's own row, under the search box and the sync line — twenty controls sharing a screen with two rows of chrome about the list it had replaced. It is a page now, and PhoneShell stands all four of its rows down for it, which is what "opens with all the options" means at 360dp. That needed a second subscription in that control: two of its flags are questions about the vault rather than about the shell, and the shell does not forward the vault's notifications. The ticks are held as entity ids rather than as rows, and written back onto the rows after every reload. Every row object in the list is replaced on every filter keystroke and every synchronisation pass, so a set of rows would empty itself once a minute under somebody choosing what to do with eleven machines. Ids that no longer resolve are dropped, so a colleague's deletion arriving mid-selection leaves a count that matches what is on screen. One caller had to change with it. ConnectToRecent opened the pane about a host, which was the desktop's drawer and the phone's card; the phone's answer is now a tick, and nothing on that list means "selected" any more — so arriving with the host merely selected would be arriving at a screen with nothing to press. Both are raised together, and the one the head in front of the user does not draw is inert.	2026-08-06 09:15:37 +02:00
jaap-jan	69858f82d1	Merge branch 'claude/vault-key-sync-sharing-d098aa'	2026-08-06 07:39:32 +02:00
jaap-jan	185790fb14	Let a key move to another vault, and ask whether it goes with the host ... Keys sync and keys are shared: SshKey is in the sync registry on both sides, the material rides in the sealed payload, and every generation of the vault key is wrapped to a new member. What was missing was the way in. Hosts and groups could move between vaults and keychain items could not, so a key typed into a personal vault before the team existed stayed there for good — and moving a host into the team's vault left it authenticating with something nobody else in that vault can read. The code said so and could do nothing about it: "the answer is usually to put a copy of that key in the destination vault", which meant pasting the private half into a second item and deleting the first. A private key on a clipboard, and two items nobody can tell apart afterwards. MoveAsync already existed on the generic repository and is now exposed for keys and passwords as it is for hosts and groups. What had to be built around it is the re-aim. An item re-sealed under another vault's key lands with an id of that vault's making, so every host bound to the old one and every group lending it as a default is left naming a tombstone — and a host bound to something its vault no longer holds refuses to connect rather than falling back to a typed password. A move without the re-aim would look like a success and break every machine on that key. It runs over every vault this session can write to, because a binding resolves across all of them, and it counts what it could not rewrite: an item from a newer client, or one in a vault this account may only read. Those are said in the sentence afterwards rather than swallowed. The host's move asks the question rather than deciding it. A binding resolves across vaults, so the moved host goes on working for the person who moved it whichever way this is answered; it is the colleagues they have just joined who hold one vault's key and cannot connect with a host whose key stayed behind. Unticked, and it stays that way on purpose: moving a key into a team's vault hands it to everybody holding that key, and this design does not default anybody into a disclosure. Under the box is the count of everything else that authenticates with that key, because a key twenty machines use is a different decision from one nothing else touches, and neither number is visible from the panel otherwise. The question is answered against the vault in the picker, so choosing a different destination re-asks it and a key already in the destination offers nothing. One thing fixed on the way. A host that inherited its key from its group arrived in the destination naming nothing at all — the group belongs to the vault it left — so a machine that connected before the move refused after it, with no sentence anywhere saying why. The resolved binding is now written onto the host as it crosses, and the stranded-binding warning reads the resolved binding too, which is the case where somebody is least likely to know a key is involved. MOVE is on both heads, for keys and passwords only: a tag, a bucket and a pin are read from the active vault alone, so "another vault" is not a question any of them has. Four tests cover the move and its re-aim, the host's move with the key brought and without it, and the inherited binding.	2026-08-06 07:39:15 +02:00
jaap-jan	3d9ed03b09	Let a snippet be shared to a vault, the way a host already can ... A snippet was a first-class vault item everywhere except where it mattered: the crypto, the sync, the server table and every registry already treated it exactly as they treat a host, and the screen read it out of the active vault alone. So the one command a team most obviously wants to hold in common — the incantation somebody worked out once and everybody else retypes — was the only item kind that could not leave the machine that wrote it. The read is the half that had to come first, and it is why this is not simply a MoveAsync. ReloadSnippetsAsync now lists every readable vault rather than the active one, in the shape ReloadHostsAsync and ReloadKeysAsync already use: the vault new items go into first, then by vault name, then by label, with a badge on the row only where there is more than one vault to tell apart. Without that, a snippet moved into a team vault would have disappeared from the very screen that moved it, and one a colleague wrote there would never have arrived at all — sharing would have looked like losing. Three writes were pinned to the active vault and each one broke differently once the list spanned several. The delete tombstoned in the wrong vault, which tombstones nothing and leaves the snippet on screen. The save is the bad one: an update sent to the active vault creates a second snippet there and leaves the team original untouched, so the person editing sees their fix and nobody else ever does. That is a fork with no symptom, which is why the vault is now a parameter and the screen latches it when the editor opens — the chosen vault for a new snippet, the row own vault for an existing one — rather than reading it back off a selection that can move under a half-typed form. VaultViewModel has carried editingHostVaultId for the same reason since hosts crossed vaults. Two controls rather than one, and that is the same line the host pane draws. The editor asks which vault a new snippet is filed into; MOVE re-seals an existing one under another key and tombstones the first. Putting the second inside the first would let somebody correcting a typo hand a command to a team by leaving a picker where they found it, so the picker is not drawn for an existing snippet at all. Both live on SnippetsViewModel rather than VaultViewModel because this screen owns its editor, unlike the host drawer; the writing they ask for is still the vault. A snippet crosses whole, which is the one way this is simpler than the host it copies. A host leaves its group and its tags behind because both are items of the vault it came from and would dangle for everybody in the destination. A snippet is a label, a command and a note, and none of them points at anything — so there is nothing to strip, nothing to report as left behind, and what the copy says instead is the thing that is actually at stake: who can read the command afterwards. For a command that may carry a hostname or a path, that is the whole decision. Two judgement calls worth finding later. A hidden vault now hides its snippets, filtered in the screen projection rather than in VaultViewModel.Snippets, which is the rule keys and passwords already follow: the list stays whole so nothing that resolves against it breaks, and the projection is what a preference about reading gets to change. And the nav rail count is left spanning vaults unfiltered, because Vault.Hosts.Count beside it is unfiltered too — filtering one of the four would make the rail disagree with itself. Four flow tests in VaultSharingTests, beside the host ones they mirror: the move re-seals with a new id and carries the runs-on-insert flag across, the move with nowhere to go refuses rather than opening an empty picker, the editor files into the vault chosen on it, and the edit of a shared snippet goes back to its own vault instead of forking. That last one is the regression the latch exists for and the only one whose absence has no visible symptom. Plus a layout test with the move panel open, since that paragraph wraps in a 300-pixel column and the desktop pane it lands in is measured. The whole suite passes: 1660 tests, none failing.	2026-08-06 07:39:03 +02:00
jaap-jan	ca07d63585	Offer to bring the keys an ssh_config points at ... An import that recorded a key path and left every host asking for a password was an import whose result did not connect. The answer to that was a manual paste per key, which is the sort of thing people do once and then stop importing. So there is a tick, and it starts off. With it off nothing changes: an IdentityFile becomes a note and the host asks for a password. With it on, IMPORT reads each host's first IdentityFile out of ~/.ssh, stores it in the vault encrypted like any other key, and binds the host to it. Three things about how it is drawn are load-bearing rather than tidy. It is a default nobody arrives at by accident. The sentence beside it names the directory rather than saying "your keys", because that is what somebody is agreeing to. And nothing is read during SCAN — tick it, read what it says, untick it, and no private key has been opened. This is the only place the application opens key material out of a directory the user did not point at file by file, and the whole of what makes that acceptable is that it took a deliberate press. One vault key per file, however many entries named it: an ssh_config pointing twelve hosts at one id_ed25519 is the ordinary shape, and twelve copies would be twelve things to rotate and eleven to forget. A file whose material is already in the keychain is bound to rather than stored again, which is what makes running the import twice harmless. What cannot be read off a disk is a passphrase, so a protected key arrives without one — and the report under the button names those files rather than leaving a host to fail at connect time with a message about a malformed key. Telling them apart means decoding for OpenSSH's own container, whose cipher name is the first field inside the base64 rather than anything in the armour, and that is the format ssh-keygen has written by default for years. The 88 base64 characters it decodes need 66 bytes, not 64: with the smaller span every protected key came back unprotected, which the tests now pin. A path that is not on this machine leaves its host imported and unbound, exactly as it would have been with the tick off, and is named in the same report. A config carried from another machine is the ordinary case, not an error.	2026-08-05 08:58:28 +02:00
jaap-jan	746711da9d	Let a tap on the phone's host list mean connect ... Choosing a machine raised the connect bar over the bottom of the list: a password box, CONNECT, EDIT, MOVE and DELETE. Five controls in the way of the one thing a tap on a machine's name obviously means. So the gestures split. A tap connects. A long press raises the bar, with all five. The pencil in the phone's header — its only persistent chrome — edits whichever host is chosen, which is the one of the five common enough to be worth a control that is always in the same place. The flag doing it is the desktop's own IsHostPaneOpen rather than a second one. That head made exactly this move when a selection stopped opening its drawer, and the question both are asking is "has somebody asked about this host" — answering it twice is how two heads come to disagree about what a selection means. One tap cannot finish: a host that authenticates with a typed password has nowhere on a list to be given one. That tap raises the bar with the box in it and says so, and a second tap with the box filled in connects. The branch is in the view model rather than in the head, because "can this machine be reached without asking for anything" is the same question the bar's own password box answers, and a copy of it in a view would be a second reading of a binding chain that has one. Two mechanics worth knowing. Avalonia raises Tapped on release whatever the press lasted, so a long press would open the bar and then connect — one touch firing both gestures — which is why HostsScreen tracks the hold and swallows the tap it precedes. And Holding only fires once IsHoldingEnabled is set, so that and the handler are attached together rather than one in markup and one in code. ConnectToRecent now opens the pane rather than selecting the row. On the phone it has to: a selection alone raises nothing now, so going back to a recent machine would land on a screen with nothing to press.	2026-08-05 08:43:33 +02:00
jaap-jan	50fa6fba38	Let the phone delete a host, and move or remove a group ... The desktop gained three things the phone did not follow: moving a group to another vault, the second question asking whether a group's deletion takes its hosts with it, and — since long before either — deleting a host at all. What that left was a head whose v3 + can fill a keychain and whose editors can correct one, with no way to empty either. The commands could not simply be bound. DeleteGroup and MoveGroup aim at GroupTarget, which is the selected card or the open group, and the phone has neither: its list draws headings, and a heading's selection deliberately bounces back to the host. Called bare on that head they would have returned having done nothing — a DELETE that appears to have been pressed and has not. Both now take the row and fall back to GroupTarget for the desktop's menu, and ConfirmMoveGroupAsync resolves from the panel's own movingGroupId rather than from the selection, which is also the honester answer on the desktop: what moves is the shelf the panel was opened on. The heading's pencil became a menu. Three icons after a chevron, a name, a vault badge and a count is what would be left of the name at 360dp, so the ⋯ raises the add sheet's shape carrying Edit, Move to another vault, a rule, and Delete — the desktop's card menu, in the one idiom this screen already has. It does not carry Open: the desktop's grid holds one level of the group tree and this list holds all of it flattened, so there is nowhere to open a group into. DELETE under a host sits on a row of its own beneath EDIT and MOVE rather than beside them. A phone has no hover and no tooltip, so where a thumb lands is the only thing separating a destructive control from an ordinary one. Both questions take the controls that asked them — ShowsConnectControls, which is the phone's half of the rule ShowsHostPaneActions already carries for the desktop's drawer — so DELETE cannot be pressed a second time underneath its own confirmation. Preferences gained the running version, and the sentence saying this head does not replace itself and that no DodoSSH server will ever offer one. It reads Updates.CurrentVersion off the same view model the desktop's UPDATES section does, over the null channel that reports itself unsupported. Nothing was needed for the realtime push: it is composed in ServerConnection, which both heads use. Seven tests, all phone-shaped — a group acted on with nothing selected, the menu waved away leaving nothing armed, the ungrouped heading raising none, and the bar's three states. The rectangles remain unmeasurable for the reason phase 8 gives; the checks for them are 8.10 to 8.13 and 13.6.	2026-08-04 19:58:10 +02:00
jaap-jan	780f4bf892	Merge branch 'main' into the group's move and its deletion question ... Main took the group's EDIT and DELETE off the GROUPS heading while this branch was adding a MOVE beside them, so the conflict was about the same six pixels from both directions. Main's answer wins outright, and it is the better one for the reason its own message gives: a button beside a heading has no card under a pointer to mean, and had to work its subject out from the selection or from the trail. Moving a group had that problem worst of all — the thing it takes with it is everything on the shelf, and "which shelf" is not a question a button there could answer plainly. So the MOVE button is gone and the menu entry it was drawn beside is the whole of it. That entry was already in this branch, above the separator DELETE sits below, and it needed no change: the card menu selects whatever was right-clicked before it runs anything, which is exactly the aiming a group move wants. Three things went with the button. ShowsGroupActions, which main deleted because hiding buttons was all it did, and which this branch had extended to hide them for the move panel as well. CanMoveGroupTarget, which existed to answer whether that button was worth drawing — CanMoveSelectedHost stays, because the phone really does leave the host's MOVE out rather than offer a refusal, and a menu whose entries came and went would be a menu whose items move. And the two test assertions that read them, which were describing the button rather than the behaviour; what they were guarding is that the two panels never share the moment, and IsConfirmingGroupDeletion says that directly. The move panel and the deletion question both keep their place under the heading, which is where the buttons were and is now simply where that section puts things. They still exclude each other, by disarming rather than by a visibility flag: MoveGroup clears a pending deletion and DeleteGroup folds the move panel away. Manual checks 3.3 was rewritten by main for the menu and by this branch for the tick, and now says both; 3.3a is new and walks a two-level shelf across a vault boundary, which is the half of this feature no headless test can watch land.	2026-08-04 17:11:06 +02:00
jaap-jan	a86731ee08	Move the shelf as well as what is on it, and ask what a deletion takes ... Two things about a group, and they turn out to be the same argument twice. **A group can be moved to another vault, and it takes everything on it.** The host's move shipped last week and stopped one level too low: moving twenty machines into a shared vault meant twenty trips through a menu, and each one arrived stripped of the group it had been filed under, so the shelf had to be rebuilt by hand on the other side. Moving the shelf is what people were attempting. MOVE sits between EDIT and DELETE over the group cards, and on the card's own menu above the separator DELETE is below — the same place, and the same reasoning, as the host pane's ⋯ entry. **The whole subtree goes, and taking less was never coherent.** A group's children are items of the vault it is leaving, so a parent moved alone leaves them naming a tombstone and they surface as roots in the vault the user has just emptied: half a shelf here and half there, from one gesture that said "move this". The hosts are the same argument and are the half the request was about. The groups go first, top down, and the hosts last. Each item is re-sealed under the destination's key and takes a new id — VaultItemRepository.MoveAsync, which HostGroupRepository now exposes — so nothing pointing at a group can be written until that group has landed and its new id is known, and a child's parent must already be over there. What an interruption leaves is therefore hosts still in the vault they started in, under UNGROUPED: visible, and re-movable. The reverse order would leave hosts in the destination filed under nothing. The parent stays behind and the tags are dropped, which is the host move's rule one level up: both are items of the vault being left, so a reference carried across would resolve on the machine that moved it and dangle for everybody else in the destination. The moved group arrives at the top level, and the panel says so before the press rather than the status line saying it after. Keys and passwords are kept — those genuinely resolve across vaults, and clearing them would take a working host and make one that cannot connect — and any now outside the destination is named, because that is precisely what the other members of it will not be able to resolve. Refused as a whole where anything under the group was written by a newer client, rather than skipped item by item: a move that left behind what it could not re-encode would file some of the shelf in one vault and the rest in the other, which is the state this exists to prevent. Refused with a host editor open, as the drop gesture is, because it rewrites hosts. And the walk carries a visited set, for the reason every walk over this tree does: a group that is its own parent — which two offline clients can build and no editor was ever shown — would otherwise be appended to the move list for as long as there was memory. **Deleting a group now asks what should become of the hosts under it, and that reverses a decision this repository had written down.** The deletion did not touch them: the reference was left dangling, the list resolved it to nothing, and the machines turned up under UNGROUPED. That was right for one of the two things people delete a group for and wrong for the other — a heading being tidied away should leave its machines alone, and a project that has been decommissioned is a shelf and everything on it — and nothing in the code can tell which of the two it is looking at. So it is asked. A tick rather than a pair of options, because the two answers are not equally weighted: keeping the hosts is recoverable and deleting them is not, so the safe answer is the one that needs no decision. It is off on every question, including the one that disarms it, or a tick left standing would destroy the next group's machines on the strength of a decision about the last one's. Once the deletion knows which hosts it means, leaving them naming something that has gone is a state kept for no reason, so the unticked answer writes too: N hosts with the reference cleared, where the ticked one writes N tombstones. That is the N writes HostGroupRepository refuses to hide behind a DeleteAsync overload, made where somebody asked for them and where the count is on screen first. The nested groups take the deleted group's place in the tree rather than being orphaned to the top level. A read-only host is skipped, counted and named, because unfiling it would re-encode a payload this build cannot represent — and the cost of skipping is a dangling id, which every reader here already survives. **Both are the desktop's alone**, and that is not an omission. The phone draws groups as headings in the host list and has never had a way to delete or move one; the two panels take the row of buttons over the group cards, and there is no such row on a 360dp screen to take. One test had to change its premise rather than its assertion. EditingAHostWhoseGroupIsGone built its dangling reference by deleting the group, which now unfiles instead — so it imports a host naming an id nothing resolves, which is what a group deleted on another machine actually looks like and is the only way that state still arises. The picker's placeholder is still needed and still covered. Four places said an item could not be moved between vaults. Two were about a group and were true when written; the other two were left stale by the host's move. All four now say what is true, including the design gaps document, where the chevron beside the vault name stays undrawn for the reason it already had.	2026-08-04 17:04:06 +02:00
jaap-jan	6fad84c484	Merge branch 'claude/remove-group-edit-delete-buttons-3d38ec'	2026-08-04 16:40:56 +02:00
jaap-jan	d02d103569	Take the group's EDIT and DELETE off the heading row ... A pair of buttons sat at the end of the GROUPS heading, and the card's own right-click menu arrived later offering the same two things. Two controls for one job, and the buttons were the harder of the two to read: a button beside a heading has no card under a pointer to mean, so it had to work its subject out — the selected card, or failing that the group the trail ends with, which once a group is open is not a card on screen at all. The menu never has that problem, because opening it is what aims it. The menu is the whole of Edit and Delete on the desktop now. ShowsGroupActions went with the buttons, since hiding them was all it did. GroupTarget stays: the menu's two entries read it after the code-behind has selected whatever was right-clicked, and its fallback to the open group is what makes + NEW HOST open on the group somebody is standing in rather than on none. One case changes shape. Opening a group with nothing inside it folds the card grid away, so from in there nothing can be right-clicked — renaming that group means pressing the trail back one level, to where it has a card of its own. The buttons used to cover it through the fallback. The trail was already the way out of an empty group, and 3.2a says so now. The test that pressed EDIT through its binding is replaced by one holding that no button on the screen commands either of them, which is the failure worth catching: a button coming back is not a compile error, and it would draw itself in place, aimed at the group the trail ends with. What that test covered — a command that has to accept an empty parameter, and act on the card the pointer was on — the two menu tests beside it already do.	2026-08-04 16:39:14 +02:00
jaap-jan	589300253d	Merge branch 'claude/vault-realtime-push-d64c61'	2026-08-04 16:38:42 +02:00
jaap-jan	4b706bc3c3	Say when a vault has moved, so nobody waits out the minute ... The delta pull was cheap enough to run on a timer and the client did, once a minute. That is fine for a machine and wrong for two people: an edit a colleague makes is up to a minute stale, which is long enough for both of them to make it and produce a conflict neither needed to have. Shortening the interval is the obvious answer and the wrong one — it costs a request per client per interval whether or not anything happened, and it converges on a busier server that is still late. So the server now says so. A client holds a WebSocket open at GET /api/v1/events, subprotocol dodossh.events.v1, and gets a line down it when something it can read has changed. ADR 0012 has the reasoning; three parts of it are worth repeating here, because they are what everything else rests on. **What crosses the socket is a notice, never data.** A frame names a vault and how far its change log has got. No item, no ciphertext, not even which item it was. The client's answer is the delta pull it would have run anyway, so there is still exactly one code path that applies a change to a keychain, and it is not this one. Pushing the items themselves would save a round trip and fork that path in two, with the cursor, the merge and the tombstone rules duplicated across both — ADR 0003 put every mutation through one write path for that reason, and this keeps every read on one for the same one. It also makes a dropped notice harmless, which is what lets the fan-out below be as simple as it is. **Polling stays, and is what guarantees a pass.** The minute timer is unchanged. A network that eats WebSockets, a server with Events:Enabled off, an older server, a proxy that will not upgrade, a notice dropped under backpressure — every one of those leaves a client behaving exactly as it did before this commit. Nothing is reachable only over the socket and nothing is meant to become so; VaultViewModel's AutoSyncInterval remark now says that where somebody changing it will read it. **The bearer token authorises the upgrade, unlike the relay's ticket.** Not an inconsistency with ADR 0004: the relay's socket is a byte pipe whose whole authorization decision — which host, which IPs, which port — is made before it opens and never revisited, and it is the extraction seam for a process that must hold no ACL code. This one is a view of the caller's own vault list and has to keep answering "what may this account read" for as long as it is held. A ticket would carry that answer in a token and be wrong the moment the account's access changed. The two bounds that arrangement needs are met rather than waved at: the socket is closed at the token's exp with close code 4401 and the client comes straight back with a fresh one, and the vault set is re-resolved every few minutes as well as on the changes known to affect it. Both bound *metadata*, because a notice contains nothing else and reading a vault still needs a key this server has never held. **The fan-out.** VaultEventHub is a singleton holding the sockets this node accepted; publishing walks them and asks each whether it cares, rather than keeping a vault-to-subscriber index that every re-subscription would have to move entries between under a lock publishing also takes. At a few hundred sockets per node and an event rate bounded by how often people edit keychains, the walk is not measurable and its races are obvious. Per-connection queues are bounded and drop the *oldest*: a notice means "pull vault X, which is at least at sequence N", so the newest subsumes what it displaces and the client's answer is identical either way — which is what lets the publish path be void, never block, and never fail. Announced from the endpoint rather than from SyncService, and that placement is the point: by then the push has committed and released the per-vault advisory lock. From inside it would name a sequence no reader can see yet and would hold the lock that serialises writers across a socket write. Only the highest *applied* sequence, so a batch of pure conflicts announces nothing, and a duplicate — already announced when it first landed — announces nothing either. Grants and membership publish too, and those take the *recipient* rather than the actor. This is what AdmitNewVaultsAsync has been apologising for since sharing shipped — "the recipient is handed nothing, there is no push channel" — and the README with it. A vault shared with somebody now turns up as it is shared. The comment and the README paragraph both say what is true now, and both keep saying that the pass is what *discovers* the vault, because a client with no socket has to arrive at the same place. **On the client**, VaultEventStream is really a reconnection policy wrapped round a ClientWebSocket: a dropped socket is the ordinary case here — laptops sleep, proxies time out, tokens expire, servers are redeployed — so nothing in it treats a failure as exceptional, and every path ends in "wait, then dial again". A connection that lived long enough to say hello resets the backoff, so a laptop that woke, worked, and lost its network an hour later does not inherit a minute-long wait it has already proved it need not take. A 4401 close skips the backoff entirely and asks the token provider again, which is the whole reason that close code is distinct. A server that does not advertise the events feature gets IdleVaultEventStream, which never delivers — so IVaultServer.Events is never null and every caller stays on one shape, because the correct behaviour without a socket is the behaviour with a silent one. The shell's background loop now selects between the timer and a notice, and both waits are held across iterations. That is load-bearing rather than tidy: PeriodicTimer permits one outstanding WaitForNextTickAsync and throws on a second, and an abandoned channel read stays registered and consumes the next notice written. Either defect leaves the first notice working and every one after it silently lost, which is why NoticesKeepWakingTheLoop_NotJustTheFirst pushes three and not one. Notices are coalesced over a quarter of a second, so one person's save — a host and its log entry are two items — and a colleague clearing a folder each cost one pass rather than a dozen. **The kind is a string, not an enum**, and that is a compatibility decision. UseStringEnumConverter throws on a value it does not know, so a newer server sending a kind an older client had never heard of would not add an unreadable frame — it would break that client's socket outright. A string is ignored instead. ProblemCodes is the same shape for the same reason. **Tested on both sides, through the real pipeline.** The endpoint suite opens a genuine socket against TestServer and proves a push produces a notice, that another account's push does not reach it, that a ping is answered, and that a frame this server cannot parse does not end the connection. Two of those assert on *ordering* rather than on absence within a timeout — the stranger's write goes first, so a socket that leaked would have announced it before the one the test waits for — because "nothing arrived in two seconds" is a test that passes on a slow machine for the wrong reason. And ANoticeCarriesNoCiphertext asserts on the bytes that crossed the wire rather than on the record's fields, since the latter would only prove that this type has no payload member, which is a tautology; the former is what catches a field added later without anybody thinking about disclosure. The client suite drives VaultEventStream through an injected connector, because the one thing a test cannot do to a real network is make it fail on cue — and failure is the entire subject. The shell suite proves a notice produces a pull inside ten seconds against a sixty-second timer, so the timer cannot be what caused it. **Two limits, stated rather than left to be discovered.** Fan-out is in-process, so a deployment running more than one API replica only pushes for writes its own replica handled and the rest arrive on the timer. IVaultEventPublisher is the seam a PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY backplane implements and it is deliberately not implemented: an untested backplane is worse than a documented gap, and multiple replicas degrade to the behaviour before this commit rather than breaking. And a client is notified of its own writes; it pushed, so it already pulled, and the extra pass finds nothing. Suppressing that echo correctly needs a per-device identity on the socket, and the same user's other machines must still be told. Manual checks phase 15 covers what no test here can reach, which is the network in between: a proxy that will not upgrade, one that drops an idle socket without telling either end, a laptop lid, a token expiring. Every one of those is invisible inside a test host, and every check there passes only if the change arrives quickly *and* still arrives with the socket taken away. ADR 0012 also fixes one thing about the shared terminal session this is the transport for, so it need not be renegotiated later: session data will be binary frames on this same socket, because base64 in a JSON envelope is the wrong shape for the one payload here that is continuous rather than occasional. Two questions it explicitly does not answer by implication — whether those bytes go through the API at all, and what end-to-end encryption means when the second party watches a stream rather than holding a key — are ADR 0001 questions and get their own decision. 1512 tests pass. DodoSSH.SystemTests was not run — it needs the whole compose stack — so the end-to-end path is unverified for this change beyond what the manual checks describe.	2026-08-04 16:37:41 +02:00
jaap-jan	742f65c204	Merge branch 'claude/card-selection-state-sharing-f9348c'	2026-08-04 16:28:34 +02:00
jaap-jan	0258ec3029	Merge branch 'claude/groups-vault-sharing-e4b154' ... # Conflicts: # src/DodoSSH.Client.Shell/ViewModels/VaultViewModel.cs	2026-08-04 16:28:29 +02:00
jaap-jan	3f419cb19b	Let one card be selected at a time ... The hosts screen draws two grids, one above the other, and each is a ListBox with a selection of its own. Nothing joined them, so a group card and a host card could be lit at the same moment — two chosen things, under two pairs of buttons of which only one would act on whichever the eye had settled on. Both grids mark a selection the same way, so there was nothing on screen to say which of the two the next press belonged to. They share one mark now. Selecting a host clears the group and selecting a group clears the host, and that second one takes the detail pane down with it: a pane about one machine cannot go on standing beside a marked group, because nothing on it would be about what is selected. Losing a selection deliberately clears nothing. A null arrives whenever either list is rebuilt — every keystroke in the filter box and every background sync — and treating that as somebody deselecting would take the mark off a group card because a search emptied the grid beneath it. The reload needed the same guard for the same reason. It falls back to the first host when nothing is selected, which is what puts a target under CONNECT on a fresh unlock; with one mark between the two grids that fallback would have unselected a group nobody had touched, once a minute. It is skipped while a group holds the selection, and it moved into a method of its own because the comment saying why pushed ReloadHostsAsync past sixty lines. One consequence needed handling rather than accepting. The phone's only route into the group editor is a button on a heading in the host list, and it worked by selecting the group first — which under this rule takes the highlight off the machine somebody was about to connect to, on a screen that draws no group cards to say where it has gone. EditGroup takes the group as an argument now: the heading passes its own row, and the desktop's button beside the cards passes nothing and still means "the card that is selected". What the tests hold is the half that lives in the controls. Clearing the property has to reach the list that is drawing the card, and a selection nulled in the view model while the card stays highlighted is the exact failure this is about — so the rule is driven on the real screen, in both directions, against the ListBoxes' own SelectedItem. The desktop's EDIT is pressed through its binding for the same kind of reason: a command refusing the button's empty parameter would be a button that never fires, and nothing about the markup would say so.	2026-08-04 16:27:20 +02:00
jaap-jan	c39df3f51e	Share the shelf as well as what is on it, and ask a group which vault ... A group is where hosts are filed and what lends them a port, a username and a key, and until now it could only ever be made in the vault this machine files new items into. So sharing a vault shared the machines and not the arrangement: a colleague opened four hosts filed under a group they could read the name of and nothing else, and the group a teammate made had no card, no heading and no way to be corrected from the screen looking straight at the hosts inside it. Recorded as half shipped in docs/design-import-gaps.md, and this is the other half. The list stopped being the active vault's. It was narrow for two stated reasons — a row shown across vaults has to carry which vault it lives in, because rename and delete both need it, and two vaults may hold a "production" each, which a layout with one heading per group cannot tell apart — and both are now paid for rather than avoided. Every row carries its vault, the badge beside the name says which, and the two cards sit side by side saying what they are. The three shapes of the group read are now deliberately different sizes. The list is what a person looks at, so a hidden vault's groups leave it: a card that cannot be opened onto anything is worse than no card. The per-vault lists are what a picker offers, because a picker is always asking about one vault. The map is what a host's GroupId resolves through, and it stays widest of all — including over hidden vaults, since a group lends a port and hiding a vault must never change what one of its hosts dials. RebuildGroups is the one place hiding is applied, which is what keeps those answers apart. The editor asks which vault on the terms the host editor's picker set: while adding only, hidden where there is one writable vault, and never offered afterwards, because the two are encrypted under different keys and moving an item is a delete and a retype. Its parent picker is that vault's alone, for the reason the host editor's group picker is one level down — a parent in another vault is a level half the key holders cannot resolve, and their hosts would inherit from nothing. + NEW GROUP inside an open group departs from NewHost and takes that group's vault rather than the standing preference: a group made inside another is in its parent's vault by construction, and answering "inside PLATFORM" with a group elsewhere and no parent would drop the one thing the button said. Two smaller things follow from the cards spanning vaults. Dragging a host onto a group card in another vault is refused with both names, because the write it would make is exactly the id-nobody-can-resolve the host editor's picker was fixed to prevent, and treating it as "no group" would unfile a host somebody was plainly filing. And a group being renamed says its vault in the drawer's header, since the picker is not drawn for an existing one and renaming a colleague's shelf without being told whose it is is the edit most worth naming. The save target is a nullable field behind a property that falls back to the standing preference. The group name box is bound whether or not anything raised an editor over it — that is what the desktop's group bar was, and typing a name into it and pressing ADD is still a way to make a group, which would otherwise have written to no vault at all. 1575 tests pass, five more than before: a group filed into a shared vault is listed and renamed there, the editor's picker does not move the keychain screen's, the parent picker offers only its own vault, a cross-vault drop is refused, and hiding a vault takes the cards without changing what its hosts dial.	2026-08-04 16:27:16 +02:00
jaap-jan	bee6202949	Let a host be moved to another vault ... The one thing the host editor's vault picker has always been unable to offer, and the comment beside it said so: an existing host's vault was not a field because the two vaults are encrypted under different keys. That is still true. What changed is that it is no longer a reason to have nothing. **A move is a copy and a tombstone, and it cannot be anything else.** A payload is sealed under its vault's key and its AAD binds the vault, the entity id and the item version, so no edit moves one and no server call could — the server holds ciphertext it cannot read. What crosses is the plaintext, in this process, between an unwrap under one key and a seal under another. VaultItemRepository gained MoveAsync for it, so the three decisions below live in one place with their reasons rather than being re-derived at each call site. The item takes a new id. Keeping it would put one entity id in two vaults, and the item table is keyed on the type and the id rather than on the vault — so the destination's row and the source's tombstone would be the same row, and the move would delete what it had just written. The write comes first and the tombstone second, which decides what an interruption leaves: a copy in both vaults, visible and deletable, rather than a tombstone with nothing on the other side. Both are queued rather than sent, so the window is a crash between two local writes; it is still worth being on the survivable side of. Two activity lines rather than one, because that is what the two vaults actually record. A single "moved" line would have to be written to one of them and would be missing from the other's history. **The group and the tags stay behind, and that is the half that makes this honest.** Both are items of the vault the host is leaving: the editor's group picker offers one vault's groups and the chips are drawn from one vault's tags. A host carrying either across would resolve it on the machine that moved it — groups and tags are resolved over every readable vault — and dangle for everybody else in the destination. The mover and their colleagues would be looking at two different hosts. Cleared and reported beats carried and invisible. The key or password binding is kept, and the difference is not inconsistency. Those genuinely resolve across vaults — one key on twenty hosts in three vaults is the arrangement they exist for — so clearing them would take a working host and make one that cannot connect. What the message does instead is name a binding that is now outside the destination, because that is precisely what the other members of it will not be able to resolve. **It is not in the editor**, on either head: the desktop puts it in the detail pane's ⋯ menu above the separator Delete sits below, and the phone beside EDIT. A picker inside the form would move a machine as a side effect of correcting a port, which is the bug the editor's own vault picker was fenced off to prevent in the first place. The panel takes the footer as the deletion question does, and says what will be left behind before the tap rather than after it — on a phone, where the status line afterwards is one line on a screen somebody has already navigated away from, that is the only place it reliably gets read. The phone hides the button where there is nowhere to go rather than offering one that answers with a refusal; the desktop keeps its menu entry either way, because a menu that grew and shrank would be a menu whose items move. One thing found while writing the test and deliberately not changed. The pass that follows every write on this screen reports what it moved and supersedes the confirmation — for a save and a delete as much as for a move — so the move's own sentence is what somebody sees offline. The test asserts it in that state and says why. Making confirmations survive their own sync pass is a question about the whole screen rather than about this. Four places said an item could never be moved, two of them sentences on screen in both heads. All four now say what is true, including the design gaps document, where the chevron beside the vault name stays undrawn for a different reason: a chevron on a subtitle implies an edit, and this is a re-seal, a new id and two references left behind.	2026-08-04 16:04:15 +02:00
jaap-jan	e9cea2ccbc	Let a shared vault arrive, a bucket be found, and a vault be deleted ... Three things a user reported, one of which was a real bug and one of which was not the bug it looked like. **A vault shared with somebody never reached their machine.** The grant was correct at both ends: the sharing client verified the recipient's key against the key log and wrapped every generation to it, the server stored it, and /me would have returned it. Nothing asked. VaultSession.RefreshVaultsAsync — the method whose own summary says it is "called after a share and on a periodic pass" — had no caller anywhere in the application, so the vault list was whatever the last browser sign-in cached. A restart did not help: an offline unlock reads that same cache. The vault appeared only if the recipient happened to sign in through the browser again, which is why this looked like sharing being broken rather than like a list that was never re-read. So every synchronisation pass now re-reads it, before it syncs. SyncOnceAsync takes the whole server rather than its sync half for that reason, and the order matters: a vault admitted by the refresh is one that same pass then pulls, where the other order would show a newly shared vault as an empty one until the minute after. The shell is told only when the set actually changed — it rebuilds the tab strip's vault menu from the session's list, and doing that on every quiet pass would rebuild a menu once a minute for nothing. The test needed the fake server to be able to do something no test here had needed before: hand this account a vault it did not make. ShareVaultWithMe wraps a real key to the encryption key this account enrolled, so the keyring opens it exactly as it opens a real colleague's — a helper that filled the field with bytes would let a vault appear in the list and never prove it could be read. **Adding an S3 bucket on the desktop works, and could not be found.** The report was that it is not possible; driving the real XAML headlessly says otherwise — Keychain, + BUCKET, and the editor saves. What is true is that S3 is where somebody goes looking, and from there SELECT BUCKET opened a combo box with nothing in it and no sentence anywhere saying that a bucket is a keychain item. From where the user was standing that is indistinguishable from an application with no way to add one. The empty state now says what a bucket is and offers a button that lands on the keychain with the editor already open — navigating to the screen and leaving + BUCKET to be found among five buttons would be most of the same problem. The phone gets the sentence and no button: its keychain screen reads and deletes and edits nothing, so there is no editor to send anybody to, and naming the machine that has one beats an empty control that reads as a screen still loading. The keychain screen's layout test grew the two categories it never covered. Tags and buckets arrived after it was written, and the header strip it measures is one that has overflowed twice before. **A vault can now be deleted.** DELETE /api/v1/vaults/{id}, gated on Admin — the line the rename already drew, for a stronger version of its reason, since this takes the vault from everybody in it at once. The row is soft-deleted and every grant to it withdrawn in one write; VaultAccessService filters on the stamp at both ends, so from that moment the vault is absent from every member's /me and every call naming it answers 404. Their clients notice on the pass described above. The team behind it is archived when it owned nothing else, which is the mirror of renaming it: a vault made from the vaults screen gets a team named after it that nobody was ever shown, and leaving that behind would leave a membership list no screen has a row for. That is a second call rather than one transaction — archiving is TeamService's, it refuses while a team owns vaults, and it can only tell that this one no longer does once the deletion is committed. A crash between the two leaves an empty team: invisible, archivable afterwards, harmless, and a better failure than a vault that could not be deleted because tidying up after it did not work. Two refusals worth stating. The personal vault cannot be deleted at either end: it is created by enrollment, everything filed nowhere else lives in it, and no call would make another. And the items are kept — ciphertext behind a vault nothing will resolve, so deleting them buys no confidentiality while destroying what an operator undoing a mistake would need. The client drops the key from the keyring and the row from the cache rather than waiting for a refresh, so the list is right immediately; the items stay, as they stay for a vault whose grant was withdrawn, because a copy is on every other member's machine too and removing these rows would be the client pretending to a reach it does not have. The confirmation says that out loud before it is answered. It is the one sentence this screen must not leave implied: deletion is no more retroactive than revocation is. See ADR 0001. Desktop only, deliberately. The Android vaults screen offers no rename and no hand-over either, so adding delete alone there would be the one destructive vault operation on a screen with no other. Three places asserted that a vault can never be deleted — TeamService's refusal message, the TeamNotEmpty problem code, and ADR 0009 — and each now names the route instead.	2026-08-04 15:34:40 +02:00
jaap-jan	a0568d4c35	Merge branch 'main' into the vaults screen, and let it rotate keys too ... Main built vault key rotation while this branch was reshaping the screen that would drive it, so the two met in the same three files. Every other conflict was textual and resolved by taking both; these are the ones where a decision had to be made. **The view model.** Main taught TeamsViewModel three things and this branch had renamed and rewritten it into VaultsViewModel. All three are ported rather than dropped, because each is a behaviour rather than wording: adding somebody now wraps the vault to them on the spot instead of leaving SHARE KEY to be pressed, removing somebody rotates the vault and hands the new key to whoever is left, and a share reports how many generations were wrapped. The session calls they reach — ShareTeamVaultsAsync and RekeyTeamVaultsAsync — are scoped to a membership list rather than to one vault, and they are called that way here rather than narrowed: adding somebody is a change to the list, so every vault the list carries is one they can now fetch. This screen makes lists that carry one vault, so the sentences name one; where a list carries several, naming them all is the honest report, and the members section already says the list is shared. AddMemberAsync ran two lines over the length limit once the sharing was in it, so the calls behind it moved to AddOrInviteAsync and the three-way refusal to WhyNobodyCanBeAdded — the command reads as its guards now, which is what it was before the sharing arrived. **The tests.** Main's four new cases are ported to the vault-first API, including the one that matters most: the tampered key log is corrupted *before* the add, because the add is now a route to a wrap and a test that corrupted it afterwards would be asserting about the manual route only. SelectingAVault_ListsWhoHoldsAKey now expects two holders rather than one — main's fake records the creator's own self-grant, and a key-holder list that omitted it would show the one person who can certainly open a new vault as somebody who cannot. **The README.** The limits list is six rather than four or five: main's rotation entries and this branch's "a vault cannot be deleted" describe different things and both are true. "The rekey is flagged, never performed" is gone, since it is now performed, and M3 reads *Done* rather than *Done, except rekey*. One thing worth writing down that neither side had. An invitation claimed at sign-in still leaves the key owed, where an add does not: at the moment an invitation is issued there is no account and no published key to wrap to, and the claim happens on the invitee's machine, which holds nothing. Manual check 12.1 says so, because a reader who knows adding shares would otherwise read that step as stale. 1561 tests pass.	2026-08-04 13:58:56 +02:00
jaap-jan	8707629a6c	Make the vault the thing you share, and ask a host which one it lives in ... The teams screen listed teams that owned vaults, so sharing four servers with two colleagues meant creating a team, then a vault inside it, then wrapping a key. Two of those three steps are about a concept nobody arrives wanting. The screen now lists vaults: naming one creates the membership list that carries it, named after the vault and owned by you, and members, invitations, roles, hand-over and key holders all hang off the vault they apply to. Nothing on the server moved. VaultAccessService still resolves a shared vault through team_membership and every membership call still names a team id — what went is the requirement that anybody make one. The split the whole design rests on is untouched and is still what the screen is built around: adding somebody authorises the server to serve them, and only a machine holding the key can make the vault readable. ADR 0009 keeps its decision and gains an addendum recording which half of it a person is now asked about. The one place the team resurfaces is a membership list carrying several vaults, which this screen cannot produce and does not hide: the members section says so, because "adding somebody here adds them there" is precisely the fact a vault-shaped screen is in a position to conceal. Two things left the interface and one arrived. Creating a team is gone, and so is archiving one — it was only ever possible for a team owning no vaults, and a screen whose rows are vaults has no row for one, so the button would have been unreachable or always refused. The endpoint is unchanged and the screen states the limit instead, since a vault cannot be deleted at all. The exception is a create whose second call failed: cancelling that form archives the membership list it left behind, which is a deliberate departure from this client's rule against tidying up on the user's behalf, made because nothing else can reach it. What arrived is PUT /api/v1/vaults/{id}. Without it the screen loses its only editing action, since renaming the team behind a vault is invisible to everybody who was never shown the team. It is gated on PermissionFlags.Admin — the line UpdateTeamEndpoint already draws, because a name is what everybody in the vault sees it called rather than part of its contents — and it renames the owning team with it when that team carries nothing else, so the row an operator reads and the name a user says cannot drift apart. The slug never moves, for the reason it does not move on a team rename. The session edits its cached vault row rather than replacing it with the response, which deliberately carries no wrapped key. The host editor now asks which vault a host goes into, beside the name, while adding and only where there is more than one vault to write to. It is a second picker rather than the keychain screen's reused, and the two selections are separate on purpose: that one is a standing preference about where new items go, this is a field of the host in front of you, and binding both to one selection would mean a click on the other screen could move a half-typed host. An existing host is not offered it at all rather than offered it disabled — the two vaults are encrypted under different keys, so moving an item is a delete and a retype. That forced a fix worth naming. The group picker was built from the active vault's groups whatever vault the host was being filed into, so a host put in a shared vault could be filed under a group only its author can resolve — a colleague would see it filed under nothing, which is the quietest kind of wrong. Groups are now kept per vault and the picker follows the vault choice. Two renames, because the pair they would otherwise have made is a bug farm: ShellScreen.Vault became Keychain and VaultScreen became KeychainScreen, which is what the rail has always labelled that screen, leaving Vault for one vault's contents and Vaults for the vaults themselves. The enum values are unchanged; NavRail.axaml writes them as x:Static literals. 1536 tests pass, seven more than before. Five are new on the server — the rename endpoint's success, the team it does and does not take with it, the two refusals and the empty name — and the client suite gains six and folds four together, having lost the two about archiving a team.	2026-08-04 12:22:29 +02:00
jaap-jan	89f1f07992	Merge branch 'claude/main-page-group-hierarchy-3a3210'	2026-08-04 10:10:19 +02:00
jaap-jan	2a56ae3efb	Put a host inside the group it is filed under, rather than beside it ... The group cards were headings with a navigation gesture bolted on. Opening one narrowed the grid to its hosts, but the level above already held every host in the keychain — so a card could only ever subtract, filing something changed nothing but a chip, and a keychain with forty machines was forty cards however carefully anybody had arranged them. The trail said ALL HOSTS and meant it. So the grid holds one level of the tree, the way a directory pane holds one directory. A host filed under a group is inside that group and is not also on the screen the group's card sits on; the outermost level is what nothing has been filed into. A group is a place now, and the cards, the trail and the drop target were already the vocabulary for saying so. The find box is the exception and had to be one. Typed into, it searches the open group and everything under it, which from the outermost level is every machine in the keychain. A box scoped to the level it was typed on would answer "no host matches that" about a host this keychain has got, and finding a machine without first remembering where it was filed is most of what the box is for. The accent chip on a card is what tells a searched-up host from one that lives at this level. Two things came free with the change and are handled rather than left. The phone would have broken. Its list binds SidebarRows, which was a projection over VisibleHosts, and it has no group cards and nowhere to open one into — so level-scoping would have left it drawing only the hosts nobody had filed. RebuildSidebarRows takes its own pass over the hosts now, narrowed by the vault switches and the box and by nothing else, which is the whole tree flattened under headings: exactly what it drew before. And anything created inside a group disappeared the moment it was saved. The host editor opens on the group the screen is about rather than only on a selected card, and + NEW GROUP defaults its parent to the group that is open. Deliberately not the selected card there: a highlighted card is what EDIT and DELETE are aimed at, and reading it as "and the next group goes inside it" would nest one because somebody had clicked something. The host editor takes both because it always took the selection, and its picker shows the answer before anything is written. Dropping a host on a group card now takes the card off the grid, and the selection goes with it — Connect, Edit and Delete all read that property and none of them should be aimed at a card that has left the screen. The status line is what says where it went, which is why the manual check now asks for it to be read. Coming back out through the editor lands the host on this level again, and there the selection survives. An empty grid has two more things it can say: that every host is filed away, which the level-at-a-time grid made reachable and which is not the same sentence as "there are none", and that nothing under this group matches what was typed — with ALL HOSTS named as the way to widen it. Not changed, and next door: a group card counts the hosts filed directly under it, so a group holding only subgroups reads "0 hosts". That was already true and is more visible now that its subgroups' hosts are not spilled onto the level above. 1522 tests pass. Four are new — the level rule and the phone's flat list asserted together, the box reaching two levels down, the all-filed sentence, and where a host and a group made inside a group end up. MovingAHostToAGroup was asserting the old outcome and is rewritten rather than adjusted: it held that the host stayed selected, and what it holds now is that the host leaves the level it came from.	2026-08-04 09:51:55 +02:00
jaap-jan	d5b1a73182	Move the keys when a membership changes, not just the flag ... Adding somebody to a team granted them nothing readable and removing them rotated nothing. Both were honest — the interface said so in as many words — and both left the actual work to a button somebody had to remember to press, on a machine that happened to hold the key. Adding now wraps every team vault this machine can open to the new member, and removing revokes their grants and moves each of those vaults to a fresh key that goes to whoever is left. The rotation is where the design had to be decided rather than written. A vault key is per generation and an item carries the generation it was sealed under, so advancing the vault and withdrawing the old grants would make everything already stored unreadable to everybody, including whoever pressed the button. So earlier grants are kept: a member holds one per generation, /me serves them as PriorKeyWraps, and VaultKeyring holds a key per generation — the newest for writing, the item's own for reading, chosen per item on every read path. Sharing issues one grant per generation held, because a recipient handed only the current key would open the vault to find most of it undecryptable; revocation takes every generation, because leaving the history behind leaves them able to read everything written before the rotation. The bump itself is one server transaction. POST /vaults/{id}/rekey must name exactly current + 1 and the vault's xmin token makes that binding, so two admins rotating at once do not both walk away believing they succeeded — the second is refused and told to read the vault again. The server contributes the moment and no cryptography: it cannot generate the key, cannot tell that the one it is handed differs from the old one, and checks that the caller held the old one the only way it can, by requiring a live grant at the current generation. What this does not do is re-encrypt what is already stored, and the product says so rather than the reassuring version: everything written from the rotation onwards is unreadable to the person who left, and nothing about the past changes. That half is deferred and is safe to add incrementally precisely because a vault at mixed generations stays readable. ADR 0010 records the alternatives — revoking the old grants, chaining each key under its successor, re-sealing every item in one request against a server that caps a push at 500 operations — and why each was rejected. Two things fell out of the change rather than being asked for. The grant listing would have shown a member once per generation, so it now returns one row per holder carrying the best key they hold, which is what makes a row below the vault's generation mean "still owed the new key". And MarkUnreadable gives up the write target as well as reporting: a client whose vault was rotated elsewhere would otherwise have gone on sealing items under its superseded key — readable to its author, unreadable to everybody else, with nothing to show for it.	2026-08-03 23:05:40 +02:00
jaap-jan	7b7fd7b2ef	Make a vault the thing you create, and let a window set one aside ... Everything a shared vault needs was already here and arranged the wrong way round. A vault has to belong to a team, so creating one meant going to the teams screen, founding an organisation, and only then adding a vault to it — which the NEW VAULT button named after the team, so a team with three of them held three vaults called the same thing and nothing told them apart. Somebody who wants to share four servers with two colleagues is not asking to found anything. So the form asks for a name and nothing else. The team is derived from it, slug included, and created with this account as its owner; the vault goes inside; and the members, roles, invitations and key holders that hang off a team are all on screen the moment it exists. The tab strip's New vault entry lands there with the new vault selected, which is where the next thing anybody wants to do already is. That is two calls, and the first can succeed alone. When it does the team is kept: the id is minted once into pendingVaultTeamId, so pressing CREATE again resends the identical create — which the server treats as the same team — and retries the vault, and the message says all of that rather than "creating the vault failed". Archiving the orphan instead would be a client deleting something on the user's behalf because a later step failed, which is the kind of tidying that eventually archives a team somebody has just been added to. A slug taken by somebody else is retried once with a disambiguated one and never in a loop; a name with no a-z or 0-9 anywhere in it falls back to the team's own id rather than to a refusal pointing at a field nobody was shown. The other half is the caret beside Vaults. Being in four teams means four teams' machines in front of you all day, and the answer is a switch per vault rather than four sign-ins. Switching one off takes its hosts, groups, keys and pins off the screens that list them and does nothing else: it still syncs, its key stays in the keyring, it stays choosable as somewhere to file a new item, and a shown host that authenticates with a key filed in it still connects. That last one is what shaped the design. TryBuildAuthentication resolves a binding out of the keychain's typed list and a cross-vault binding is legal, so filtering the reload loops — the obvious implementation — would have turned a preference about reading into an outage. Only the projections a person reads consult IsVaultShown; every Reload*Async stays whole, including the dialled-endpoint set that decides which pins are described as unused, because that is a hint which invites deleting trust. Snippets, logs and buckets needed no code and the comment says so out loud: all three read ActiveVaultId alone, and the personal vault is drawn in the menu ticked and cannot be switched off — it is the active vault, the group and tag editors' target, and the save picker's fallback, so hiding it would empty half the application rather than filter it. The preference is a column on the cache's vault row, which is what makes it survive both a relaunch and the /me refresh that runs every minute: Apply does not touch it, deliberately, because the server has never been told which vaults this machine is showing. It is in the encrypted cache rather than settings.json because it is a list of vault ids and that file's own doc comment says what may go in it. VaultSession cannot see the type at all — ReadableVaults is what the sync loop walks, and a filter reaching it would be a vault that quietly stopped syncing, found out weeks later from a host that was never there. The strip's note refusing a MenuFlyout stands and is unchanged. This flyout sidesteps the question rather than answering it: the handler selects the Vaults tab first, which collapses the renderer, so nothing native is under the popup by the time it opens — the move QuickConnect already makes. A headless test asserts that ordering, which is as far as headless can go with no native window, and manual check 1.6 is the other half. The phone is out of scope on purpose: it has no tab strip and its teams screen's vault section is read-only. The plumbing is in Client.Shell, so it can adopt this later; until then nothing there is ever hidden, which is today's behaviour. 1514 tests pass. Fifteen are new in VaultVisibilityTests, and the ones worth naming are the guards: a hidden vault still syncs, still holds keys that authenticate hosts on screen, still appears in the save picker, and still counts towards which pins nothing dials. Not fixed, and noted here because it is next door: VaultGrantService's team-vault create refuses a taken vault id rather than returning the existing vault, while VaultSharing's own remark claims a create whose response was lost is safe to resend. A lost 200 therefore leaves a vault whose key the client's catch already zeroed, openable by nobody.	2026-08-03 21:52:27 +02:00
jaap-jan	fd6c4f5155	Merge branch 'claude/host-detail-pane-design-e98621'	2026-08-03 16:31:43 +02:00
jaap-jan	e3dfe5c371	Make the host pane something you ask for, and draw it as cards ... THE DRAWER USED TO ARRIVE WITH THE SELECTION. IsDrawerOpen read "a host is selected", so touching any card took 304 pixels off the grid — including every card arrowed past on the way to the one somebody wanted. Choosing among forty machines was charged the price of the pane for one of them. A pencil now appears on the card under the pointer and on the selected card, and that is what opens it; IsHostPaneOpen is the flag, and the grid's context menu gained Details… so the pane is reachable without a pointer, which a hover-only control is not. Once open it follows the selection rather than pinning the host it was opened on: a pane about one host beside a grid marking a different one is two answers to the same question. Losing the selection closes it and clears the flag, or a filter matching nothing would leave the pane armed to spring open again on the next card merely selected — which is the behaviour the pencil exists to remove. The pencil is drawn over the card rather than in a column of its own. A column would have cost the name 30 pixels of a 232-pixel tile, permanently, for a control that is only there while the pointer is; the dot and the pencil stack in the two corners of that edge instead. IsVisible and not opacity, because a button at zero opacity still takes the click and the card underneath does not. A HEADER, A BODY THAT SCROLLS, AND A FOOTER, which is the one structural change in the pane. The header names what the drawer is about and carries the two things true of every panel; the footer carries the one thing each panel is for — CONNECT, or SAVE, or the question about deleting. Only the middle scrolls, so the button somebody came here to press can no longer be below the fold, which CONNECT could be on a host with fifteen tags. That also widens what the layout harness certifies: it skips anything inside a ScrollViewer, and the control each panel exists to offer is now outside one. THE SAME THREE CARDS TWICE. Address, General, Connection — first as rows stating what the host is, then as boxes for changing it. The detail pane's rows are buttons that open the editor: the design draws every fact as a filled box, and rather than draw an input that refuses the pointer, pressing one leads to the same card with a real box in it. Nothing here saves as you type, and that is not timidity — saving validates the key-or-credential exclusion and writes one encrypted payload, so a box committing per keystroke would be a save per character and a half-typed hostname on the wire. Every value the pane prints is the resolved one, and says "inherited" beside it where a group supplied it. The number is the same either way and the edit is not: clearing a group's default moves every host that never overrode it. A HOST CARD IS TWO LINES AND NO CHIPS. The subtitle is now "ssh, root, pci, eu-west-1" — the transport, the resolved account, then every tag — replacing both the user@host:port line and the wrapped row of tag chips under it. The address went to the card's tooltip rather than nowhere: a card is read while scanning forty machines, where the name and the kind of machine are what is being looked for, and an address is what you read once you have found it. "ssh" is a constant today and is printed anyway, which is the one thing here that argues with this codebase's own rule about constants dressed as readings. It is the first item of a list whose other items vary, and a list beginning with the account on one card and a tag on the next has no shape to scan. The remark on HostRowViewModel.Summary says so rather than leaving it to be discovered. WHAT THE DESIGN DRAWS AND THIS PANE HAS NOT GOT: Share this host, Add Telnet, "SSH ID, Certificate, FIDO2", the backspace-key mapping row, the vault picker's chevron and Show more. Sharing is per vault and not per item, every session here is an SSH channel, there are no identity or certificate item types, nothing carries a terminal setting to the renderer, and an item cannot be moved between vaults at all. Six controls with nothing behind them, listed in docs/design-import-gaps.md with what ships instead, and none drawn disabled. The credentials row is marked with ◆ rather than the ⚿ the nav rail uses for the keychain. U+26BF is outside both faces this application substitutes for the design's fonts, so it lands on whatever the platform's fallback has; every other glyph in the pane is from Geometric Shapes, which both carry.	2026-08-03 16:26:43 +02:00
jaap-jan	0c0ac94312	Open a group by double-clicking it, and say where you are ... ONE PRESS WAS DOING TWO JOBS. A group card was the only place a group could be selected — it is what EDIT and DELETE aim at — and it was also the control that narrowed the grid to that group. So there was no way to name a group in order to rename it without every host outside it leaving the screen at the same moment, and no way back except a SHOW ALL button that appeared beside the heading. Two gestures instead. A click selects and does nothing else; a double-click opens, which is what the host cards below already do to get a shell and what the transfers screen's directories already do to go inside one. The grid now has one vocabulary rather than one per list. The gesture is wired in the code-behind beside the host one, and guarded the same way: a double-click on the space around the cards must not open whichever group happened to be selected. THE CARDS ARE ONE LEVEL NOW, not every group in the keychain. Groups nest, and drawing all of them flat was the only honest thing to do while a card was a filter — a filter nobody can see is a filter nobody can turn off. Once opening one became navigation the cards became its contents, and VisibleGroups is that level beside Groups the way VisibleHosts sits beside Hosts. Groups itself is untouched: it is what every lookup reads and what the phone's headings are built from, and the phone binds none of the new members. Which is what the trail is for. A level with no name and no way out is a grid that has quietly hidden things, so a breadcrumb sits above the cards — drawn exactly as the transfers screen draws a directory path, same flat crumbs and same separator, because it is the same control answering the same question and a window with two breadcrumbs that look different has two ideas of what a path is. The first crumb is always there and always goes back to every host, which is what SHOW ALL was; that button went with it, because a control that only says "stop" beside a trail that says where you are is a second control for one job, and this one also gets you back one level rather than all the way. EDIT AND DELETE AIM AT GroupTarget: the selected card, or the open group when no card is selected. Without the fallback a group with nothing inside it could be opened and then never edited, because opening a group is exactly what takes its own card off the screen. It is also what a file manager does — act on the selection, and on the current folder when there is none — and the pair is now hidden with nothing to act on rather than shown doing nothing. A DANGLING PARENT AND A CYCLE BOTH HAD TO END UP SOMEWHERE REACHABLE. Neither is prevented: a parent id may point at a group deleted on another machine, and two clients can each re-parent A under B and B under A while offline, which no merge can see because the pointer is inside the payload. EffectiveParents promotes both to the outermost level, which is the same degradation the resolver's visited set produces for inheritance. The repair for either is the group's own editor and the editor is opened from its card, so a group drawn nowhere would be a broken state with the fix locked inside it. Three tests in HostGridTests: the split rule through the properties the cards bind, the pointer gesture itself in two windows so that "one press still only selects" is asserted separately from the pair, and a nested group opened, emptied of cards and walked back out of one level. The last presses the trail as it is actually rendered rather than calling the command, because a crumb reaches the vault through a $parent binding — a string that compiles whether or not it resolves, and would otherwise leave a row of buttons that do nothing. 85 layout tests and 234 shell-flow tests pass. Manual-checks 3.2, 7.6 and 7.7 follow the new gestures, and 3.2a and 3.4a are new: nesting, and the two states above, both of which need two machines and neither of which headless Avalonia can reach.	2026-08-03 16:16:18 +02:00
jaap-jan	0c4bfea2a8	Merge branch 'claude/group-creation-hosts-dragdrop-56c6a3'	2026-08-03 15:50:12 +02:00
jaap-jan	f9d08b738c	Take the group headings out of the host grid, and drop onto a group card ... A first group turned the wrap of host cards into an accordion: SidebarRows interleaves a full-width fold-away heading — chevron, name, count — between the cards, and in a grid that reads as a dropdown somebody left open. The desktop grid binds VisibleHosts now. The headings and the fold stay for the phone, whose list has no room for the row of group cards the desktop draws above the grid. What a heading said, the card says: HostRowViewModel.GroupLabel, resolved once per reload like the tag names, drawn as an accent chip and absent from a host in no group — or in one that has been deleted, which is the same thing to look at. What a heading also was is the drop target, and that moves to the group cards. Two things go with it. A host dropped onto another host card used to be filed beside it, which was legible while a heading named the band of cards it landed in and is guesswork now; it is refused. And UNGROUPED was how a host was dragged back out of a group; the way out is the picker in its own editor, which is the one place "no group" can be said in words. A drag held at either edge of the grid scrolls it. Without that the gesture only works for whoever can see both ends of it: the group cards are the first thing in the scroller, the host may be the fortieth card down, and a drag cannot use the wheel. A step per drag event rather than a timer, so it follows the pointer and stops when it stops. The two heading-shaped tests are replaced. TheHostsGridHoldsCardsAndNoGroupHeadings asserts the grid's contents rather than only measuring them, because a heading that came back would lay out perfectly cleanly. TheGroupCardsAreWhatAcceptsADroppedHost raises a real DragOver over both kinds of card and checks the effects and the mark — the nearest a headless test gets to a gesture no headless test can synthesise. manual-checks 3.1-3.2 and 7.6-7.9 follow.	2026-08-03 15:49:58 +02:00
jaap-jan	562fb444a8	Merge main into the phone connections branch ... Main had already taken this branch's first two commits, so what merged is the Connections work against three things that landed beside it. Four of the six conflicts were prose about arrangements both sides changed; two were real. **The phone hub gained a Teams row while this branch was moving the keychain onto it.** Both are additions to `IsMoreSurface` and both belong: teams because the desktop reaches them from its rail and the phone through the hub, the keychain because a bottom bar is for the places a session moves between. The membership test, the back gesture's first case and the hub's own arithmetic all take the union. The distinction is now written down rather than implied — teams is the design's count plus one, and the keychain is the only rearrangement of it: the bar lost a slot to gain that row. **`ConnectAndAnnounceAsync` was the real one.** Main gave it `RememberTypedPasswordAsync`, which binds the password that just worked to the host it worked on; this branch had replaced the `HostRowViewModel` that method needs with a four-field `ConnectionTarget`. Keeping both meant deciding what a manual connection does with a password that succeeded, and the answer was already written on the screen it is typed into: nothing. There is no item to bind a credential to and none to bind it on, and that path saves nothing by design. So `ConnectionTarget` carries the row again — as a nullable, in place of the host id it had, with `HostId` derived from it. Two things read it and both are things that can only be done to a keychain item rather than to an address: naming the log entry, and keeping the password. Null is not missing data there; it is the whole of what makes the manual path different, and having one field rather than two keeps "was this a keychain host" a question with one answer. The desktop's rail lost SFTP and S3 to the tab strip on main, so the README's "a rail with nine slots has room" was true when it was written this afternoon and is not now. It says the room rather than the number. Phase 11's four new device checks and main's Phase 12 on teams were the same conflict twice — two appends to the end of one file — and both are kept. Verified after resolving: the solution builds, the Android head builds clean, and 837 tests pass across the seven client suites, including main's own additions (233 shell, 79 layout, 240 domain, 118 sync, 54 session, 74 terminal, 39 storage).	2026-08-03 15:35:49 +02:00
jaap-jan	f5ffd1983d	Make Connections the place a connection is made, and put the keychain away ... Four changes to the phone, and the last one needed the connect path taking apart. **The bottom bar is three entries.** The keychain moved onto the hub, which is now SETTINGS with a gear rather than MORE with a hamburger. A bottom bar is for the places a session moves between, and keys, credentials and tags are managed occasionally and then left alone — which is the shape of everything already behind that hub. With the keychain on it, "more" stopped being a description of what is there. `ShellScreen.Vault` joining `IsMoreSurface` is the whole of the change: the tab that lights, the header that stands down and the back gesture's first case all read that one property, which is why the switch mirrors it by construction rather than by a second list. The keychain screen grew the header every hub screen has, because the shell's own is not above it any more and without one there would be no back arrow and nothing saying what the list is. The desktop keeps its Keychain rail entry. A rail with nine slots has room, so this is the second thing the two heads arrange deliberately differently, after the hub itself. **Terminal became Connections**, and the word does more work than a rename usually does — see below. The enum member stays `ShellSurface.Terminal`, for the reason the tab was never called Vault: the surface is a terminal, and the word a user reads is the product's. **The + puts the software keyboard away.** It sits above a terminal somebody is typing into, so the sheet it raises was arriving underneath a keyboard covering the half of the screen the sheet is on — and worse, laid out into the strip left above it, since the keyboard's inset shortens everything this head draws. Avalonia cannot do this and it is worth knowing why: `TopLevel.InputPane` reports the keyboard and offers nothing that closes one, because the framework's model is that it belongs to whatever has focus — and this keyboard was raised by the `WebView`'s own text input, by a native view Avalonia's focus manager never owned. Clearing Avalonia's focus leaves it exactly where it is. So `Platform/SoftKeyboard.cs` asks `InputMethodManager`, off the decor view's window token, and every step of it is allowed to be absent. **With nothing open, Connections is a connect screen rather than an empty state.** A box taking `user@host` or `user@host:port`, a password, and the machines most recently connected to underneath. The box is the only path in this product to a machine the keychain has never heard of, which is a real case it had no answer for: an address somebody was handed five minutes ago. A typed password and nothing else — offering the keychain's keys would be a second binding resolution beside `TryBuildAuthentication`, and the argument against a second one is written there at length. Nothing typed is saved, and the screen says so: a machine worth keeping belongs on HOSTS, where it can carry a key, a group's defaults and a name. The recents come out of the vault's own connection log rather than a list kept in this process, so they survive a restart and arrive on a new phone with the keychain. Deduplicated by address, because this is a list of places and not of events, and capped at six so the box stays above the keyboard. Emptied when the vault is — they are decrypted entries naming where somebody works, and a lock that left them on screen would be a list still readable after every key that decrypted it was zeroed. Tapping one leads to whichever of two things it is: a keychain host goes to that host's connect bar, where its key, its password box and its refusals already live, and an address goes back into the box, without the password, whose absence is the point of that path rather than a gap in it. **The connect path was shaped like `HostRowViewModel` all the way down.** The log entry, the identification, the failure record and the retry all took a row. They take a four-field `ConnectionTarget` now, so a connection to an address shares the ladder of refusals, the host-key question and the tab's lifecycle rather than growing a second copy of them. `ConnectionRecorder.Record` and `Identify` have always taken a nullable host id, so the log could already hold a connection with no item behind it. One behavioural change falls out of that and it is the one to know about: **trusting a host key now retries the attempt that raised the question** instead of re-running whichever host is selected. That was correct while a selected host was the only way to connect; with a manual target it would dial a different machine, or refuse with "choose a host first" over a key the user has just agreed to trust. The test selects a host first, so a regression cannot pass by connecting to the wrong thing successfully. `LogsViewModel.ReloadAsync` split so the connections half can be read alone. Reading the keychain's activity for a screen that offers neither would double the decryption on the list that was already the expensive one. Twelve tests: the parse grammar as a theory over seven refusals, the dialled request, the retry, and both branches of tapping a recent row. The recents rows are built by hand rather than connected-and-closed — what those tests are about is which branch a row takes, and driving it through the recorder's queue would test the recorder, which `DodoSSH.Client.Session.Tests` already does. What needs a device is phases 11.6 to 11.9 of `docs/manual-checks.md`.	2026-08-03 15:26:47 +02:00
jaap-jan	1b7df47537	Merge main into the desktop redesign branch ... Four conflicts. Three were two people adding to the same spot, and one was a real collision: main gave the connect bar a REMEMBER tick in the same pass that this branch took the connect bar off the hosts screen. REMEMBER is now in the drawer, beside the password box it qualifies. Nothing about the feature changed — RemembersConnectPassword, its refusal to fire until the remote has accepted the password, and the six tests over it are main's untouched — only where it is drawn. The move improves it slightly and it is worth saying why rather than claiming a merge was neutral: the bar had one row and had to fit the box, the tick, the authentication note and CONNECT along it, which is why the tick was a bare "REMEMBER" in tracked capitals. A column has room to put it under the box as a sentence, where it reads as a property of the password rather than as a fourth control in a row. MainWindowViewModel: both sides added members after ShowTerminal — the desktop's three fixed tabs here, the phone's connect menu on main. They do not interact, so both are kept, each under its own heading. TeamsScreen: main added the team's own RENAME, HAND OVER and ARCHIVE, a member's LastActive, the role a new member arrives as, and the KEY HOLDERS list. This branch had only bumped the file's font sizes a point. Resolved by taking main's file whole and re-running the bump over it, so the new controls join the scale rather than sitting a point below everything around them. README: both sides described a different head's third pass in the same paragraph. Both kept. Two things checked rather than assumed, because this branch moved the furniture the merged commits sit on. The chrome heights main's terminal work touched are the phone's, not the desktop's — 44, 42 and 24 are unchanged, so the layout harness's budget still describes the window. And main's keychain DELETE did not reach VaultScreen.axaml, whose header this branch rearranged, so the five buttons that overflowed at the larger type are still five. 2415 tests pass, up from 2369 by the 46 main brought.	2026-08-03 15:17:55 +02:00
jaap-jan	208443b932	Move SFTP and S3 into the tab strip, and the host list into a card grid ... Four asks in one pass over the desktop head, and two of them are furniture moving rather than anything new. THE STRIP IS THE WINDOW'S NOW, not the terminal's. Vaults, SFTP and S3 sit at its head and cannot be closed, and open terminals follow them. SFTP and S3 left the nav rail to get there, which is the one semantic change: they are the two destinations you stay in while something runs, and a rail entry is for somewhere you go and come back from. So the rail belongs to the Vaults tab and collapses with it, which also means SFTP, S3 and a terminal each get the full 1016 rather than the 826 a page gets. The tab is expressed as "a page, and not one of the two the strip took" rather than as a fourth ShellSurface. Both are still ShellScreen members and have to be — that is what they are on the phone, where they are two rows in a hub — so a surface each would have been a second way to say a thing Screen already says. IsTransfersShowing and IsBucketsShowing light the other two tabs unchanged. What is new is one field: the page Vaults comes back to, because it is the one tab with sub-navigation and therefore the one that can return to the wrong place. That is not the hidden field ShellSurface argues against — that one would be a second copy of "which page"; this is a tab remembering its own. THE HOSTS SCREEN IS A GRID, and the 268-pixel sidebar is gone. That column was choosing among forty machines and editing one of them at two-thirds width, and it was narrow so the editor beneath it could be a column at all. Cards took the first job at full width; a 304-pixel drawer took the second and collapses when nothing is selected. Pressing a group card narrows the grid; SHOW ALL is the way back. The group editor moved into the drawer as well, which finally makes IsEditingGroup mean the same thing on both heads — it was the phone's alone, because the desktop's editor was a bar that was always on screen. AreHostsExpanded and ToggleHosts went with the control that used them. They folded the whole list away under one heading, an affordance that existed because the column was narrow. Folding a single group is a different thing and is still here. THE TYPE SCALE IS A POINT LARGER and the text ramp is white. The base size was never stated anywhere — a bare TextBlock took TextElement's default of 12 — so raising the scale meant naming it, on Window and on UserControl. The second selector is not redundancy: the layout harness hosts a UserControl in a window it builds itself, and without it the suite would measure every screen a point smaller than it ships, silently. A selector on TextBlock would have been the obvious way and is wrong, because a style setter beats an inherited value and would collapse every deliberate step back to one number. #E3E7F4 is a blue-tinted white on blue-black surfaces, which costs contrast twice — once for being darker than white and once for sharing a hue with what it is drawn on. Pure white is 18.3:1 against the canvas where that was 15.5:1. Every step below moved with the top, so the intervals the design chose are kept and TextDim clears 9:1 against 6.4:1. The palette is shared, so the phone has both changes too. TWO DEFECTS THE HARNESS STRUCTURALLY CANNOT SEE, found by rendering the screen rather than by measuring it, and both now covered. The tile was 232 and was first written as 248, from arithmetic that left out the scrolling stack's own margins. Every layout test passed — the harness asks whether a control is inside the window, never how many fit on a line — so the grid quietly became one column wide at exactly the minimum this application guarantees, which is the shape cards exist to avoid. TheHostsGridKeepsTwoColumnsAtTheMinimumWithTheDrawerOpen counts columns instead, and fails at 248. And a card's text ran past its own border, because a horizontal StackPanel measures children with infinite width: a TextBlock inside one never learns it is short of room, so TextTrimming never fires. Both card rows are grids with a star column that gives way and an Auto column that does not — a hostname with its tail cut is still the machine you were looking for, where a badge or the word naming an auth method is not. The keychain header changed shape for the same class of reason. It was Auto,Auto,*,Auto with the buttons last, so the slack column was the only thing absorbing a change of width and five buttons fell off the right edge the moment the type grew. That is how GENERATE lost the word KEY once already. The summary sits in the star column and trims now, so the buttons always get their width. HostSidebarTests became HostGridTests and moved to the grid with the gestures it drives. docs/design-import-gaps.md gains a v3 section naming the five toolbar controls in the design with nothing behind them — a view-mode switch, a tag filter, a calendar, a share control and Serial — and manual-checks.md and the README follow the controls that moved.	2026-08-03 15:08:48 +02:00
jaap-jan	b86ff6158b	Keep the password that just worked, so the host stops asking for it ... The vault has held credentials and host bindings since they landed, and the only route from a typed password into one ran through two screens: add a password under Keychain, open the host, bind it. The password box's own tooltip instructed people to do exactly that by hand — which means typing the secret a second time, into a screen that has no idea which host it is for, while the screen that does have the password is the one being left behind. A tick beside the box does it in one step. What it produces is an ordinary CredentialSecret, named after the host, bound through CredentialId with AsksForPassword cleared beside it. That is the whole reason nothing else here had to change: it syncs, it merges, it appears in the keychain, it can be renamed and deleted, and it can be bound to the other nineteen machines that share the account. A password field on HostSecret would have been a payload schema bump, a fourth place a secret lives, and a copy per host to rotate and forget. It waits for a handshake the remote accepted, and that is not caution for its own sake. Binding on the keystroke would store whatever was in the box — including the typo about to be refused — and the host would then stop asking, leaving a machine nobody can connect to until they work out that the keychain is where the wrong password now lives. For the same reason the password is read from the credential as dialled rather than from the box, which stays typeable throughout a handshake. Off by default, because the typed box exists precisely for the passwords that should not be in a synchronised vault — a one-off on a machine somebody will never open again. The credential is written into the host's own vault rather than the active one: in the personal vault, bound to a team's host, it would be a binding every other member can see and none of them can resolve. One thing is given up knowingly. The confirmation naming where the password went is replaced a moment later by the auto-sync's own count, exactly as SaveHostAsync's "Saved 'x'" is; this follows that rather than becoming the one write that suppresses a sync line. The feedback that lasts is the row answering "credential" and the box disappearing — which is also the only way to store a password on the phone at all, since that head lists credentials but has never had an editor to create one in.	2026-08-03 14:40:25 +02:00
jaap-janandClaude Opus 5	16e0051e89	Draw the tags that have been storable and invisible since the domain landed ... `Tag` has been a full item kind for three commits — a table, a migration, a codec, a merge, a cipher — and `HostSecret.TagIds` has merged per tag so two people tagging one host both keep theirs. Nothing drew a chip. The tags a client could store were ones nothing here could see. Chips on host rows, both heads, from names resolved through the tag list rather than ids: a tag that does not resolve is left out rather than drawn, because it means the tag was deleted elsewhere or belongs to a vault this session cannot read, and a host with one chip fewer is the honest answer where a host wearing a GUID is not. The id stays on the host, so the chip comes back if the tag does. The picker is chips that toggle, matching the chips on the row behind it. A list of names to tick would make the user match an entry to a chip they can see two inches away. The box under it creates a tag and puts it on straight away, because that is when a tag is usually wanted — while tagging a host and finding it does not exist yet. Unlike every other field in that editor it writes to the keychain immediately, since a host can only name an id that exists; cancelling therefore leaves the tag behind, which is honest rather than hidden. A name that already exists is used rather than repeated: two tags called "staging" are storable and must stay storable, because two people creating one offline is how it happens, but typing it into a box beside a chip of the same name is a slip. Renaming and deleting needed a home, or the picker fills with names nobody uses and never empties. That home is a TAGS category on the keychain screen, where every other item kind is managed — and renaming is the whole reason a tag is an item rather than a string repeated inside twenty payloads: it is one write, and no host is touched. The delete confirmation counts the hosts wearing it, which is the difference between a tidy-up and losing a filter somebody relies on. The desktop host editor now scrolls, and that is not a tidy-up. A picker's height is a chip per tag in the keychain, wrapped, so somebody with fifteen tags has an editor half again as tall as somebody with three; no fixed height holds that, and trimming other fields to buy room only moves the failure to whoever has sixteen. The layout suite caught it the moment its seeder grew tags — which is why the seeder now creates ten rather than three, enough to drive the pane onto its cap so the capped shape is what gets measured rather than one no real keychain produces. The cost is named where it is paid: the harness skips anything inside a ScrollViewer, so from here it certifies that pane fits the column rather than that every field in it does. Two smaller things fell out. Five buttons overflowed the keychain header by a few pixels, so GENERATE lost the word KEY — its tooltip carries what the word did. And TotalItemCount had been counting keys and credentials while ALL showed four kinds; it counts all five now, because a number under a chip that disagrees with the rows it opens is worse than no number. An adversarial review of this change found two defects it had introduced, both green against the full suite. NewTag filed into the "new items go to" picker while the tag list only ever holds the active vault's — so with a team vault selected a tag would be created, queued for push, reported as added, and then invisible, with no row, no count, no picker entry and nothing able to rename or delete it, because there is no active-vault switcher to go and find it with. The comment on the host editor's own create path states that exact rule; this was the one place that broke it, and NewObjectStore, whose list is likewise active-vault-only, already ignored the picker. And the tag editor was the only one of five that did not disarm a pending deletion when it opened, so arming a key's deletion and then pressing + TAG left a live DELETE for an item the user was no longer looking at, directly above the boxes they were typing into. Both are fixed, both have a test, and the first was checked against the broken version before being kept. The same review caught a doc comment that had been inserted between SnippetRowViewModel's summary and its declaration, silently taking it over. Verified by the whole suite on a clean build: 1413 tests over nineteen projects, none failing. Both heads build. The rectangles the layout suite cannot reach are phase 9 of docs/manual-checks.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-03 12:42:43 +02:00
jaap-janandClaude Opus 5	4925dcf179	Give the phone the + it was promised, and the editors behind it ... Steps 5 and 6 of docs/adding-hosts-on-the-phone.md, which finishes it. The phone can now put things in a keychain rather than only read one. The floating + arrives three designs after it was first asked for. It was refused twice on the honest grounds that it would open an editor this head had not got — and that stopped being true when steps 1 to 4 landed. It raises a sheet rather than a form, because "add" on this screen has been two operations since groups existed: a host, or a group to file hosts under. Both editors are cards in the list's own row, swapped for the list rather than stacked over it, following SnippetsScreen and for the reason written there: a form on top of the list hides what it is about. There is still no dialog and no editor screen anywhere on this head. The port and username boxes may be left empty, and the greyed text inside each is what the host will actually use — following the group picker as it moves, so the form says what leaving a box blank will do rather than making it a guess. The back gesture gains a guard above the switch rather than a case inside it. An editor is not a screen and has no entry there, and it is strictly nearer: the sheet sits over the editor's own screen, so back lowers whatever is topmost before it considers moving between screens. A group editor needs a way in, and the phone draws no groups panel — so the heading in the host list gains a pencil. A + that adds groups with no way to correct one is the same strange thing to ship as one that adds hosts with no way to correct one, and worse: a group's defaults are what every host beneath it falls back to. Scouting step 6 turned up a bug worth more than the prose it was looking for. ReloadGroupsAsync read the active vault alone, which was a cosmetic limitation while a group carried only a name — a teammate's host showed under UNGROUPED and nothing else was lost. Since a group began lending a port, a username and a binding, the same omission silently dropped all three: that host would dial 22 as nobody while the machine is on 2222 as deploy, with nothing on screen saying why. The resolution map now spans every readable vault. The editable list stays narrow, because a row shown across vaults needs a vault id for rename and delete and two vaults may hold groups with one name — but the map needs none of that, since it is only ever asked what an id says. An adversarial review of this change found something I had written a comment denying. The + was a child of the outer Panel rather than of the list's row, so it anchored to the bottom of the screen and sat squarely over the new EDIT button and the lower edge of CONNECT — and because a Panel hit-tests its last-declared child first, tapping the right end of EDIT would have raised the add sheet. The comment beside it claimed it was in the list's row precisely so that could not happen, and manual-checks 8.1 names that exact failure. It is in Grid.Row 2 now. The same pass caught a connect bar that was disabled rather than hidden while its own comment said hidden, a scrim that would have flashed its default pressed chrome across the screen, a fab comment claiming an accent fill no other button had when Button.primary has it, and a back-gesture remark naming two view-model properties that do not exist anywhere in the repo. That last one came from this plan, which invented IsVaultsSurface and IsConnectionsSurface, and pointed step 6 at a ConnectionsScreen.axaml that has never existed. Both are corrected in the plan rather than quietly worked around, along with a fourth "groups are flat" site in README.md that step 1 missed. The phone's rectangles are not measurable and structurally never will be: the layout suite is net10.0, the Android head is net10.0-android, and Avalonia's application is a one-shot process global — so a second head cannot share the process even if the reference were possible. Everything the sheet and both editors bind to is shared and is tested headlessly here; the pixels go to docs/manual-checks.md phase 8, nine checks, which is where this project already sends what it cannot assert. Tags remain the one thing asked for that did not ship. Tag is a full item kind and TagIds merges, encodes and resolves, but no screen draws a chip or offers to add one, so the tags a client can store are ones nothing here can see. Both editors carry the set through a save untouched so a client that can set them does not lose them. Recorded as half-shipped in docs/design-import-gaps.md rather than quietly left out. Verified by the whole suite: 1402 tests over nineteen projects, none failing. Both heads build. Nothing seen on a display — phase 8 is what that costs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-03 11:30:00 +02:00
jaap-janandClaude Opus 5	b7335743d9	Make a host take what its group lends it, everywhere it is read ... Step 4 of docs/adding-hosts-on-the-phone.md. The domain could resolve a host against its groups; nothing asked it to. This is the wiring, and it is mostly one change repeated: read the resolved host, not the stored one. TryBuildAuthentication and TryBuildConnectionRequest now take the resolved value beside the stored one, which is where group context was being lost. It is the only authentication resolution in the product — both heads and both transports come through it — so a host inheriting its binding would otherwise have been offered a password prompt on every screen at once. The credential-username fallback becomes three levels, and Complete still refuses an empty username, but now only after the chain has been walked; refusing before it would refuse exactly the hosts inheritance exists to serve. HostRowViewModel carries its ResolvedHost, resolved once when the list is built. Address, Authentication and Dialled read it, so a row cannot disagree with itself about what it dials — and MainWindowViewModel.Rank searches Address, so a host inheriting 2222 that displayed 22 would have been unfindable by the port it actually answers on. HostsBoundTo counts over the resolved binding, which is the difference between a warning and a silence: a key bound once on a group and inherited by twenty hosts named nobody, would have been deleted, and would then have refused all twenty at connect time. HostFields.From is answered by a refusal rather than by threading a group list through the sync engine. A relay host may not inherit its port. The reason is stronger than the convenience: a plaintext column is a derived duplicate the client supplies when it pushes *this* host, so an inherited port would make it depend on another item — editing a group would change what the relay dials for every host beneath it, except that nothing re-pushes those hosts, so the server would keep dialling the old port until each was next touched for some unrelated reason. A stale wire on the relay path connects the user to the wrong service. The editor distinguishes unset from explicit in both directions. An empty port box means "take the group's" and shows what that will be as a placeholder, following the group picker as it moves — a pre-filled 2222 would have been indistinguishable from one the user typed, and saving would have pinned it. The authentication picker gains a fourth entry, offered only to a host in a group, because for an ungrouped host it would behave exactly like the first. Which found a real defect while the tests were being written. Filing an ungrouped host into a group silently pinned it to a typed password: the picker had no "Inherit" entry when it opened, so it sat on "Password (ask each time)", and saving wrote that as a decision — the host would have been pinned to a prompt nobody asked for and the group's key would never have reached it. Two guards now: the picker is rebuilt when the group changes, and BuildHost writes AsksForPassword only for a host that had the alternative on offer. The group editor is here too, and the plan never assigned it a step. Without it no group can carry a default, so every line above would have been unreachable. It grows a parent picker that leaves out the group itself and everything beneath it — a courtesy rather than the guarantee, since a cycle assembled from two offline re-parents was never offered that list — and three defaults beside the name, each of which may be left empty because "lend nothing" is an answer. Tags are stored and not editable. TagIds merges, encodes and resolves; no screen can set one yet, and the editor carries the set through a save untouched so a client that can set them does not lose them to somebody editing a port. Eight new tests, and they dial. That is the point of them: a resolved value that never reaches SshConnectionRequest is a label, and every one of these failures would be silent — a host connecting to the wrong port, or being asked for a password it does not need, with nothing on screen admitting it. Verified by the whole suite: 1390 tests over nineteen projects, none failing. Both heads build. Nothing on the phone has changed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-03 10:41:28 +02:00
jaap-janandClaude Opus 5	8c04ba60b0	Build the three things the phone's + needs, before the + exists ... Steps 1 to 3 of docs/adding-hosts-on-the-phone.md: the domain half. Nothing on either head has changed, which is deliberate — the plan orders these first because everything the editors will bind to has to exist and be merge-safe before a screen can offer it. HostGroupSecret gains a parent and four defaults, and the codec gains the version rule it never had. It stamped CurrentSchemaVersion unconditionally, which was harmless with one field and one version and stops being harmless here: upgrading one machine and renaming any group would have made that group uneditable on every machine still on the old build. It now emits the lowest version that loses nothing, so a flat group with no defaults still encodes at version 1, byte for byte, pinned against a literal. Tags become a real item over the reserved slot. Secret, codec, merge, cipher, repository, both registries, the EF entity and a generated AddTagItem migration. TagCipher names AadResourceType.Tag as a constant rather than casting the wire type, because Tag is 5 on the wire and 8 in the crypto enum and 5 there is Credential — a cast would seal every tag under the resource type for a password, encrypt and decrypt perfectly on the machine that wrote it, and only fail when another implementation refused the item, by which time the AAD is frozen into stored ciphertext. HostTag stays reserved and unused: the one thing the join buys over a set on the host is bought instead by merging TagIds per id. HostSecret grows TagIds and Port goes nullable, which is the change with the widest blast radius and the only one that loses an item rather than locking one. A host with no port of its own omits the property, an older build reads int Port as 0, and TryValidate refuses it — unreadable rather than read-only. That cost is confined to hosts which actually inherit, because the version is a maximum over the fields present; the alternative, writing 22 into every host, is the lie inheritance exists to stop telling. One decision the plan did not specify. "Three states where there were two" is four — key, credential, typed password, or the group's answer — and two nullable ids carry three. Naming neither id now means inherit, so AsksForPassword says "a typed password even under a group that lends a key" out loud. Only true is ever written and a decoded false folds back to null, so a host that never touched it encodes as it always did. Nothing already stored changed meaning: no group could lend a binding before this build, so every existing host resolves exactly as it did. HostInheritance is the resolver, and its visited set is load-bearing rather than defensive. Two clients can each re-parent A under B and B under A while offline; the merge sees one item against one item and the server sees ciphertext, so nothing upstream can refuse the pair. With inheritance the chain is walked at connect time, so an unguarded cycle is not an undrawable sidebar — it is a shell that never opens. Stopping at the first repeat degrades it to a group that reads as a root, and clearing the parent is the repair. A tag set turns out to be the one field on a host that can never ask the user anything. TagSet.ToIdMap keys by the value, so no key can hold two values, so the both-sides-moved-differently branch of the keyed merge is unreachable — asserted over the whole eight-row matrix. The conflict loop is kept anyway, because that proof is one edit from ceasing to hold and what it would cause is a discarded tag nothing records. Three guard tests failed by design and were fixed rather than relaxed: the ordered pull filter, the AAD pinning table, and the server's refusal of a plaintext parent — that last one survives with its reason rewritten, because the refusal now means "the parent is not the server's to hold" rather than "there is no such thing as a parent". The prose that said groups are flat is rewritten in all four places it appeared, not deleted. The five view-model sites that read Port directly now go through the resolver, which is a down payment on step 4 rather than the whole of it. HostFields.From still emits the stored port, and that is the one remaining place where an unresolved read would be a wrong wire rather than a wrong label. Verified by the whole suite: 1382 tests over nineteen projects, none failing. Both heads build. Nothing seen on a display, because nothing on a display has changed yet. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-03 10:21:02 +02:00
jaap-jan	4300d917a8	Stop making people wait for a handshake, and give the host list a pointer ... Connecting held the vault's busy gate, which meant a window that did nothing visible for as long as a machine took to answer — and against one that is merely asleep, that is the whole timeout. The gate is gone from that one command. A tab now appears in the strip in the same turn as the click, carrying "connecting…" rather than a pane, and the terminal's rectangle draws a card naming the host and the address being dialled. Every other screen stays usable, and two connections can be in flight at once. That splits the vault's one connection event into three, carrying an attempt id, because "which tab is this about" can no longer be answered by "the most recent one". The id also buys the two kinds of not-connecting their different endings: a refusal stays in the strip as a tab holding its reason, since by then the user is quite likely three screens away and a status line they are not looking at is not where a failure should end; a host key question takes the tab away and puts the window back on HOSTS, because the prompt is drawn there and a tab claiming failure would be competing with the thing about to resume it. ConnectAsync takes no CancellationToken any more, and that is load-bearing rather than tidying. A [RelayCommand] over a method that takes one generates a command that cancels the previous execution's token on every invocation — so asking for a second machine silently abandoned the first, measured as the first tab disappearing with "Cancelled." the instant the second was asked for. Giving up on a connection is closing its tab, and a session that lands after that is adopted rather than dropped: a shell running with nothing naming it cannot be closed at all. A tab is marked active on IsShowing rather than IsSelected. The selection survives navigating away — that is what makes the strip a way back to a terminal instead of a way to lose one — so a tab lit while preferences filled the window was a second "you are here" mark pointing at something nobody could see. The nav rail's own entries have always made this distinction. The host list grows the two gestures it looked like it already had. A right click selects the row under the pointer before opening a menu of Connect, Edit and Delete — the menu is on the list rather than in the item template, so its entries are the vault's own commands and not a row's, and it is cancelled outright over a group heading. Dragging a host onto a heading files it there, onto a host files it beside that one, and onto UNGROUPED takes it out of a group; the write is one field of one host through the same repository a save uses, refused while the editor is open because a drop is a gesture on the list and not on a half-typed form. Clicking a result in the palette connects, which is what a list of hosts under a search box looks like it does. It went through the shell's own command, so the pointer and Enter take one path. And the files screen's two pickers followed the vault's lists once, at unlock: a host or a bucket created afterwards could not be picked until the keychain had been locked and opened again, with nothing on screen explaining why the machine plainly in the host list was missing. They follow the collections now, re-finding the selection by id across the rebuild a sync pass causes every minute. 165 shell tests and 69 layout tests green, including the connecting tab, both failure endings, two connections at once, a connection in flight across a lock, and the right click acting on the row under the pointer rather than on the selection. The drag itself is in docs/manual-checks.md with the rest of phase 7 — headless Avalonia has no platform drag, and a test that claimed to have dropped something would pass while confirming nothing.	2026-07-31 22:59:33 +02:00
jaap-jan	2caedd93ff	Merge branch 'main' into the Android head ... Main grew the screens the host-management plan called for — hosts, pins, snippets, logs, import, teams — plus the ObjectStore and Import projects behind two of them, and moved WindowsDeviceKeyStore into the desktop head's Platform folder. Five of those view models landed in a directory this branch had already moved, so they join the rest in DodoSSH.Client.Shell: git spotted the rename and put them there, and the namespaces followed. Shell picks up ObjectStore and Import as a result, which the Android head then gets transitively and will use neither of at first — scoped storage means there is no ~/.ssh/config to import, and file transfer is out of its first scope. Desktop suites green at 155 and 64.	2026-07-31 21:03:22 +02:00
jaap-jan	fe9d7fc289	Give DodoSSH a phone, and a shared shell for both heads to drive ... The Android head from docs/android-port.md, taken as far as its step 6. Step 3, the spike, is answered and its throwaway screen is gone: libsodium.so and libe_sqlite3.so are both in the arm64 APK, so NSec resolves its native half on Android despite shipping no Android build, and the local cache opens. Two findings the audit could not have had: Avalonia.Controls.WebView only ships net10.0-android36.0, which settles the open "which Android versions" question at targetSdk 36; and Android has blocked cleartext HTTP since API 28, so the terminal renderer needs a network security config scoped to 127.0.0.1 or the WebView loads nothing. DodoSSH.Client.Shell is new and is why the phone can exist: the view models, the terminal renderer files and the palette moved there so both heads drive one state machine and draw from one set of tokens. The desktop head is otherwise untouched and its 144 tests still pass. The platform pieces behind interfaces that already existed: the profile directory from filesDir, a device key wrapped by a StrongBox-backed key that a fingerprint releases, and a foreground service so a shell outliving a vault lock stays true on a platform that stops backgrounded processes. Sign-in is deliberately absent rather than approximated. It needs an app link, because reusing the desktop loopback listener is the attack RFC 8252 section 8.3 names.	2026-07-31 20:58:48 +02:00