a86731ee08487df06418b9df75631c116e77aec9
7
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 jaap-jan
|
a86731ee08 |
Move the shelf as well as what is on it, and ask what a deletion takes
Two things about a group, and they turn out to be the same argument twice. **A group can be moved to another vault, and it takes everything on it.** The host's move shipped last week and stopped one level too low: moving twenty machines into a shared vault meant twenty trips through a menu, and each one arrived stripped of the group it had been filed under, so the shelf had to be rebuilt by hand on the other side. Moving the shelf is what people were attempting. MOVE sits between EDIT and DELETE over the group cards, and on the card's own menu above the separator DELETE is below — the same place, and the same reasoning, as the host pane's ⋯ entry. **The whole subtree goes, and taking less was never coherent.** A group's children are items of the vault it is leaving, so a parent moved alone leaves them naming a tombstone and they surface as roots in the vault the user has just emptied: half a shelf here and half there, from one gesture that said "move this". The hosts are the same argument and are the half the request was about. The groups go first, top down, and the hosts last. Each item is re-sealed under the destination's key and takes a new id — VaultItemRepository.MoveAsync, which HostGroupRepository now exposes — so nothing pointing at a group can be written until that group has landed and its new id is known, and a child's parent must already be over there. What an interruption leaves is therefore hosts still in the vault they started in, under UNGROUPED: visible, and re-movable. The reverse order would leave hosts in the destination filed under nothing. The parent stays behind and the tags are dropped, which is the host move's rule one level up: both are items of the vault being left, so a reference carried across would resolve on the machine that moved it and dangle for everybody else in the destination. The moved group arrives at the top level, and the panel says so before the press rather than the status line saying it after. Keys and passwords are kept — those genuinely resolve across vaults, and clearing them would take a working host and make one that cannot connect — and any now outside the destination is named, because that is precisely what the other members of it will not be able to resolve. Refused as a whole where anything under the group was written by a newer client, rather than skipped item by item: a move that left behind what it could not re-encode would file some of the shelf in one vault and the rest in the other, which is the state this exists to prevent. Refused with a host editor open, as the drop gesture is, because it rewrites hosts. And the walk carries a visited set, for the reason every walk over this tree does: a group that is its own parent — which two offline clients can build and no editor was ever shown — would otherwise be appended to the move list for as long as there was memory. **Deleting a group now asks what should become of the hosts under it, and that reverses a decision this repository had written down.** The deletion did not touch them: the reference was left dangling, the list resolved it to nothing, and the machines turned up under UNGROUPED. That was right for one of the two things people delete a group for and wrong for the other — a heading being tidied away should leave its machines alone, and a project that has been decommissioned is a shelf and everything on it — and nothing in the code can tell which of the two it is looking at. So it is asked. A tick rather than a pair of options, because the two answers are not equally weighted: keeping the hosts is recoverable and deleting them is not, so the safe answer is the one that needs no decision. It is off on every question, including the one that disarms it, or a tick left standing would destroy the next group's machines on the strength of a decision about the last one's. Once the deletion knows which hosts it means, leaving them naming something that has gone is a state kept for no reason, so the unticked answer writes too: N hosts with the reference cleared, where the ticked one writes N tombstones. That is the N writes HostGroupRepository refuses to hide behind a DeleteAsync overload, made where somebody asked for them and where the count is on screen first. The nested groups take the deleted group's place in the tree rather than being orphaned to the top level. A read-only host is skipped, counted and named, because unfiling it would re-encode a payload this build cannot represent — and the cost of skipping is a dangling id, which every reader here already survives. **Both are the desktop's alone**, and that is not an omission. The phone draws groups as headings in the host list and has never had a way to delete or move one; the two panels take the row of buttons over the group cards, and there is no such row on a 360dp screen to take. One test had to change its premise rather than its assertion. EditingAHostWhoseGroupIsGone built its dangling reference by deleting the group, which now unfiles instead — so it imports a host naming an id nothing resolves, which is what a group deleted on another machine actually looks like and is the only way that state still arises. The picker's placeholder is still needed and still covered. Four places said an item could not be moved between vaults. Two were about a group and were true when written; the other two were left stale by the host's move. All four now say what is true, including the design gaps document, where the chevron beside the vault name stays undrawn for the reason it already had. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
0258ec3029 |
Merge branch 'claude/groups-vault-sharing-e4b154'
# Conflicts: # src/DodoSSH.Client.Shell/ViewModels/VaultViewModel.cs |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
c39df3f51e |
Share the shelf as well as what is on it, and ask a group which vault
A group is where hosts are filed and what lends them a port, a username and a key, and until now it could only ever be made in the vault this machine files new items into. So sharing a vault shared the machines and not the arrangement: a colleague opened four hosts filed under a group they could read the name of and nothing else, and the group a teammate made had no card, no heading and no way to be corrected from the screen looking straight at the hosts inside it. Recorded as half shipped in docs/design-import-gaps.md, and this is the other half. The list stopped being the active vault's. It was narrow for two stated reasons — a row shown across vaults has to carry which vault it lives in, because rename and delete both need it, and two vaults may hold a "production" each, which a layout with one heading per group cannot tell apart — and both are now paid for rather than avoided. Every row carries its vault, the badge beside the name says which, and the two cards sit side by side saying what they are. The three shapes of the group read are now deliberately different sizes. The list is what a person looks at, so a hidden vault's groups leave it: a card that cannot be opened onto anything is worse than no card. The per-vault lists are what a picker offers, because a picker is always asking about one vault. The map is what a host's GroupId resolves through, and it stays widest of all — including over hidden vaults, since a group lends a port and hiding a vault must never change what one of its hosts dials. RebuildGroups is the one place hiding is applied, which is what keeps those answers apart. The editor asks which vault on the terms the host editor's picker set: while adding only, hidden where there is one writable vault, and never offered afterwards, because the two are encrypted under different keys and moving an item is a delete and a retype. Its parent picker is that vault's alone, for the reason the host editor's group picker is one level down — a parent in another vault is a level half the key holders cannot resolve, and their hosts would inherit from nothing. + NEW GROUP inside an open group departs from NewHost and takes that group's vault rather than the standing preference: a group made inside another is in its parent's vault by construction, and answering "inside PLATFORM" with a group elsewhere and no parent would drop the one thing the button said. Two smaller things follow from the cards spanning vaults. Dragging a host onto a group card in another vault is refused with both names, because the write it would make is exactly the id-nobody-can-resolve the host editor's picker was fixed to prevent, and treating it as "no group" would unfile a host somebody was plainly filing. And a group being renamed says its vault in the drawer's header, since the picker is not drawn for an existing one and renaming a colleague's shelf without being told whose it is is the edit most worth naming. The save target is a nullable field behind a property that falls back to the standing preference. The group name box is bound whether or not anything raised an editor over it — that is what the desktop's group bar was, and typing a name into it and pressing ADD is still a way to make a group, which would otherwise have written to no vault at all. 1575 tests pass, five more than before: a group filed into a shared vault is listed and renamed there, the editor's picker does not move the keychain screen's, the parent picker offers only its own vault, a cross-vault drop is refused, and hiding a vault takes the cards without changing what its hosts dial. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
bee6202949 |
Let a host be moved to another vault
The one thing the host editor's vault picker has always been unable to offer, and the comment beside it said so: an existing host's vault was not a field because the two vaults are encrypted under different keys. That is still true. What changed is that it is no longer a reason to have nothing. **A move is a copy and a tombstone, and it cannot be anything else.** A payload is sealed under its vault's key and its AAD binds the vault, the entity id and the item version, so no edit moves one and no server call could — the server holds ciphertext it cannot read. What crosses is the plaintext, in this process, between an unwrap under one key and a seal under another. VaultItemRepository gained MoveAsync for it, so the three decisions below live in one place with their reasons rather than being re-derived at each call site. The item takes a new id. Keeping it would put one entity id in two vaults, and the item table is keyed on the type and the id rather than on the vault — so the destination's row and the source's tombstone would be the same row, and the move would delete what it had just written. The write comes first and the tombstone second, which decides what an interruption leaves: a copy in both vaults, visible and deletable, rather than a tombstone with nothing on the other side. Both are queued rather than sent, so the window is a crash between two local writes; it is still worth being on the survivable side of. Two activity lines rather than one, because that is what the two vaults actually record. A single "moved" line would have to be written to one of them and would be missing from the other's history. **The group and the tags stay behind, and that is the half that makes this honest.** Both are items of the vault the host is leaving: the editor's group picker offers one vault's groups and the chips are drawn from one vault's tags. A host carrying either across would resolve it on the machine that moved it — groups and tags are resolved over every readable vault — and dangle for everybody else in the destination. The mover and their colleagues would be looking at two different hosts. Cleared and reported beats carried and invisible. The key or password binding is kept, and the difference is not inconsistency. Those genuinely resolve across vaults — one key on twenty hosts in three vaults is the arrangement they exist for — so clearing them would take a working host and make one that cannot connect. What the message does instead is name a binding that is now outside the destination, because that is precisely what the other members of it will not be able to resolve. **It is not in the editor**, on either head: the desktop puts it in the detail pane's ⋯ menu above the separator Delete sits below, and the phone beside EDIT. A picker inside the form would move a machine as a side effect of correcting a port, which is the bug the editor's own vault picker was fenced off to prevent in the first place. The panel takes the footer as the deletion question does, and says what will be left behind before the tap rather than after it — on a phone, where the status line afterwards is one line on a screen somebody has already navigated away from, that is the only place it reliably gets read. The phone hides the button where there is nowhere to go rather than offering one that answers with a refusal; the desktop keeps its menu entry either way, because a menu that grew and shrank would be a menu whose items move. One thing found while writing the test and deliberately not changed. The pass that follows every write on this screen reports what it moved and supersedes the confirmation — for a save and a delete as much as for a move — so the move's own sentence is what somebody sees offline. The test asserts it in that state and says why. Making confirmations survive their own sync pass is a question about the whole screen rather than about this. Four places said an item could never be moved, two of them sentences on screen in both heads. All four now say what is true, including the design gaps document, where the chevron beside the vault name stays undrawn for a different reason: a chevron on a subtitle implies an edit, and this is a re-seal, a new id and two references left behind. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
e9cea2ccbc |
Let a shared vault arrive, a bucket be found, and a vault be deleted
Three things a user reported, one of which was a real bug and one of which was
not the bug it looked like.
**A vault shared with somebody never reached their machine.** The grant was
correct at both ends: the sharing client verified the recipient's key against the
key log and wrapped every generation to it, the server stored it, and /me would
have returned it. Nothing asked. VaultSession.RefreshVaultsAsync — the method
whose own summary says it is "called after a share and on a periodic pass" — had
no caller anywhere in the application, so the vault list was whatever the last
browser sign-in cached. A restart did not help: an offline unlock reads that same
cache. The vault appeared only if the recipient happened to sign in through the
browser again, which is why this looked like sharing being broken rather than
like a list that was never re-read.
So every synchronisation pass now re-reads it, before it syncs. SyncOnceAsync
takes the whole server rather than its sync half for that reason, and the order
matters: a vault admitted by the refresh is one that same pass then pulls, where
the other order would show a newly shared vault as an empty one until the minute
after. The shell is told only when the set actually changed — it rebuilds the tab
strip's vault menu from the session's list, and doing that on every quiet pass
would rebuild a menu once a minute for nothing.
The test needed the fake server to be able to do something no test here had
needed before: hand this account a vault it did not make. ShareVaultWithMe wraps
a real key to the encryption key this account enrolled, so the keyring opens it
exactly as it opens a real colleague's — a helper that filled the field with
bytes would let a vault appear in the list and never prove it could be read.
**Adding an S3 bucket on the desktop works, and could not be found.** The report
was that it is not possible; driving the real XAML headlessly says otherwise —
Keychain, + BUCKET, and the editor saves. What is true is that S3 is where
somebody goes looking, and from there SELECT BUCKET opened a combo box with
nothing in it and no sentence anywhere saying that a bucket is a keychain item.
From where the user was standing that is indistinguishable from an application
with no way to add one.
The empty state now says what a bucket is and offers a button that lands on the
keychain with the editor already open — navigating to the screen and leaving
+ BUCKET to be found among five buttons would be most of the same problem. The
phone gets the sentence and no button: its keychain screen reads and deletes and
edits nothing, so there is no editor to send anybody to, and naming the machine
that has one beats an empty control that reads as a screen still loading.
The keychain screen's layout test grew the two categories it never covered.
Tags and buckets arrived after it was written, and the header strip it measures
is one that has overflowed twice before.
**A vault can now be deleted.** DELETE /api/v1/vaults/{id}, gated on Admin —
the line the rename already drew, for a stronger version of its reason, since
this takes the vault from everybody in it at once. The row is soft-deleted and
every grant to it withdrawn in one write; VaultAccessService filters on the stamp
at both ends, so from that moment the vault is absent from every member's /me and
every call naming it answers 404. Their clients notice on the pass described
above.
The team behind it is archived when it owned nothing else, which is the mirror of
renaming it: a vault made from the vaults screen gets a team named after it that
nobody was ever shown, and leaving that behind would leave a membership list no
screen has a row for. That is a second call rather than one transaction —
archiving is TeamService's, it refuses while a team owns vaults, and it can only
tell that this one no longer does once the deletion is committed. A crash between
the two leaves an empty team: invisible, archivable afterwards, harmless, and a
better failure than a vault that could not be deleted because tidying up after it
did not work.
Two refusals worth stating. The personal vault cannot be deleted at either end:
it is created by enrollment, everything filed nowhere else lives in it, and no
call would make another. And the items are kept — ciphertext behind a vault
nothing will resolve, so deleting them buys no confidentiality while destroying
what an operator undoing a mistake would need.
The client drops the key from the keyring and the row from the cache rather than
waiting for a refresh, so the list is right immediately; the items stay, as they
stay for a vault whose grant was withdrawn, because a copy is on every other
member's machine too and removing these rows would be the client pretending to a
reach it does not have. The confirmation says that out loud before it is
answered. It is the one sentence this screen must not leave implied: deletion is
no more retroactive than revocation is. See ADR 0001.
Desktop only, deliberately. The Android vaults screen offers no rename and no
hand-over either, so adding delete alone there would be the one destructive vault
operation on a screen with no other.
Three places asserted that a vault can never be deleted — TeamService's refusal
message, the TeamNotEmpty problem code, and ADR 0009 — and each now names the
route instead.
|
||
|
jaap-jan
|
a0568d4c35 |
Merge branch 'main' into the vaults screen, and let it rotate keys too
Main built vault key rotation while this branch was reshaping the screen that would drive it, so the two met in the same three files. Every other conflict was textual and resolved by taking both; these are the ones where a decision had to be made. **The view model.** Main taught TeamsViewModel three things and this branch had renamed and rewritten it into VaultsViewModel. All three are ported rather than dropped, because each is a behaviour rather than wording: adding somebody now wraps the vault to them on the spot instead of leaving SHARE KEY to be pressed, removing somebody rotates the vault and hands the new key to whoever is left, and a share reports how many generations were wrapped. The session calls they reach — ShareTeamVaultsAsync and RekeyTeamVaultsAsync — are scoped to a membership list rather than to one vault, and they are called that way here rather than narrowed: adding somebody is a change to the list, so every vault the list carries is one they can now fetch. This screen makes lists that carry one vault, so the sentences name one; where a list carries several, naming them all is the honest report, and the members section already says the list is shared. AddMemberAsync ran two lines over the length limit once the sharing was in it, so the calls behind it moved to AddOrInviteAsync and the three-way refusal to WhyNobodyCanBeAdded — the command reads as its guards now, which is what it was before the sharing arrived. **The tests.** Main's four new cases are ported to the vault-first API, including the one that matters most: the tampered key log is corrupted *before* the add, because the add is now a route to a wrap and a test that corrupted it afterwards would be asserting about the manual route only. SelectingAVault_ListsWhoHoldsAKey now expects two holders rather than one — main's fake records the creator's own self-grant, and a key-holder list that omitted it would show the one person who can certainly open a new vault as somebody who cannot. **The README.** The limits list is six rather than four or five: main's rotation entries and this branch's "a vault cannot be deleted" describe different things and both are true. "The rekey is flagged, never performed" is gone, since it is now performed, and M3 reads *Done* rather than *Done, except rekey*. One thing worth writing down that neither side had. An invitation claimed at sign-in still leaves the key owed, where an add does not: at the moment an invitation is issued there is no account and no published key to wrap to, and the claim happens on the invitee's machine, which holds nothing. Manual check 12.1 says so, because a reader who knows adding shares would otherwise read that step as stale. 1561 tests pass. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
8707629a6c |
Make the vault the thing you share, and ask a host which one it lives in
The teams screen listed teams that owned vaults, so sharing four servers with two
colleagues meant creating a team, then a vault inside it, then wrapping a key.
Two of those three steps are about a concept nobody arrives wanting. The screen
now lists vaults: naming one creates the membership list that carries it, named
after the vault and owned by you, and members, invitations, roles, hand-over and
key holders all hang off the vault they apply to.
Nothing on the server moved. VaultAccessService still resolves a shared vault
through team_membership and every membership call still names a team id — what
went is the requirement that anybody make one. The split the whole design rests
on is untouched and is still what the screen is built around: adding somebody
authorises the server to serve them, and only a machine holding the key can make
the vault readable. ADR 0009 keeps its decision and gains an addendum recording
which half of it a person is now asked about.
The one place the team resurfaces is a membership list carrying several vaults,
which this screen cannot produce and does not hide: the members section says so,
because "adding somebody here adds them there" is precisely the fact a
vault-shaped screen is in a position to conceal.
Two things left the interface and one arrived. Creating a team is gone, and so is
archiving one — it was only ever possible for a team owning no vaults, and a
screen whose rows are vaults has no row for one, so the button would have been
unreachable or always refused. The endpoint is unchanged and the screen states
the limit instead, since a vault cannot be deleted at all. The exception is a
create whose second call failed: cancelling that form archives the membership
list it left behind, which is a deliberate departure from this client's rule
against tidying up on the user's behalf, made because nothing else can reach it.
What arrived is PUT /api/v1/vaults/{id}. Without it the screen loses its only
editing action, since renaming the team behind a vault is invisible to everybody
who was never shown the team. It is gated on PermissionFlags.Admin — the line
UpdateTeamEndpoint already draws, because a name is what everybody in the vault
sees it called rather than part of its contents — and it renames the owning team
with it when that team carries nothing else, so the row an operator reads and the
name a user says cannot drift apart. The slug never moves, for the reason it does
not move on a team rename. The session edits its cached vault row rather than
replacing it with the response, which deliberately carries no wrapped key.
The host editor now asks which vault a host goes into, beside the name, while
adding and only where there is more than one vault to write to. It is a second
picker rather than the keychain screen's reused, and the two selections are
separate on purpose: that one is a standing preference about where new items go,
this is a field of the host in front of you, and binding both to one selection
would mean a click on the other screen could move a half-typed host. An existing
host is not offered it at all rather than offered it disabled — the two vaults
are encrypted under different keys, so moving an item is a delete and a retype.
That forced a fix worth naming. The group picker was built from the active
vault's groups whatever vault the host was being filed into, so a host put in a
shared vault could be filed under a group only its author can resolve — a
colleague would see it filed under nothing, which is the quietest kind of wrong.
Groups are now kept per vault and the picker follows the vault choice.
Two renames, because the pair they would otherwise have made is a bug farm:
ShellScreen.Vault became Keychain and VaultScreen became KeychainScreen, which is
what the rail has always labelled that screen, leaving Vault for one vault's
contents and Vaults for the vaults themselves. The enum values are unchanged;
NavRail.axaml writes them as x:Static literals.
1536 tests pass, seven more than before. Five are new on the server — the rename
endpoint's success, the team it does and does not take with it, the two refusals
and the empty name — and the client suite gains six and folds four together,
having lost the two about archiving a team.
|