Commit Graph
9 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jaap-jan ca7fee2358 Start the confirmation Android hands back, so an update can install
Pressing INSTALL closed the application, installed nothing and said nothing. That
is two independent faults in one method, either of which breaks it on its own,
and they hid each other: the first kills the process before the second can be
observed, and the second is silent by construction.

The pending intent handed to commit was implicit — an action string with no
component behind it. A mutable pending intent may not wrap one of those from API
34, and this head targets 36, so every current phone threw IllegalArgumentException
before commit was reached. Nothing caught it, so it left the command handler,
passed the dispatcher and took the process with it. That is the closing.

Below 34, where it did not throw, it still installed nothing. An application
holding REQUEST_INSTALL_PACKAGES rather than the privileged INSTALL_PACKAGES gets
no verdict back from a commit: what the platform answers first is
STATUS_PENDING_USER_ACTION, carrying the activity that draws the dialogue in
EXTRA_INTENT for the application to start. Android does not draw it on its own.
The comment here asserted the opposite — that a pending intent is required whether
or not anything listens, and that nothing needed to — so no receiver was ever
written, and the session was written, committed and left staged forever.

So there is a receiver now, not exported because the only sender is this
application's own commit, and the intent naming it is explicit, which is the same
change that stops the throw. Sessions are abandoned when anything fails, since one
created and neither committed nor abandoned stays staged against a per-application
cap — a repeating fault would have started failing at CreateSession instead, which
is the same bug wearing a completely unrelated face.

The reporting is the part worth keeping even after the cause is gone. Where
applying ends the process an exception has nowhere to go; where it does not, which
is this head's whole shape, it goes out through the dispatcher. RestartNowAsync now
answers the way CheckNowAsync already did, and the regression test asserts the
absence of a throw rather than the presence of one.

ADR 0014 rule 6 gets the correction in place: "asks Android to ask" is one step
longer than it reads. Check 17.5 needed no rewording — it asks for the installer
appearing by name, which is exactly the thing that never happened — so what it
gets instead is the two symptoms named, because both present as a dead button. It
is the only thing in the project that can catch either, and it plainly was never
run against a real pair of builds.

Note for whoever takes the next nightly: a broken updater cannot install its own
fix. The phone is running the code this commit replaces, so the first build
carrying it has to be sideloaded by hand; the ones after that install normally.

Compile-verified and manifest-verified — the receiver reaches the generated
manifest — and 321 tests pass. Not run on a device, which is what 17.5 is for.
2026-08-05 22:31:33 +02:00
jaap-jan 253c72d2b7 Name the organisation the repository actually lives in
ci / build and test (push) Canceled after 0s
ci / android head (push) Canceled after 0s
ci / api image (push) Canceled after 0s
It moved to DodoTech-Public, and every address in the product still said
DodoTech. That looked like it worked, which is the part worth writing down:
Gitea leaves a 301 at the old path and HttpClient follows a redirect on a GET, so
both update channels would have kept polling through it.

What a 301 does not survive is a POST. `vpk upload gitea` publishes the desktop
release by POSTing to that URL, so the stale address would have failed at the one
step the whole feature depends on — and a redirect is a thing an operator can
delete, which turns "works today" into the same silent outage this session has
already spent two commits on.

So both channel constants, both release scripts, the workflow's REPO, the image's
source label and the curl in phase 16 all name the live path. The local remote
too, which had been printing a redirect warning on every push.

Measured after the move: the org, the repo and the nightly release all answer 200
anonymously, and that release now carries both assets — the manifest and a 54 MB
APK. The upload going through also answers the open question about the reverse
proxy's body-size limit, which nothing local could test.
2026-08-05 12:51:19 +02:00
jaap-jan 9a7e3bbd5c Let a failed update check say so, instead of reporting good news
The phone reported every build as current because the release repository is
private. Gitea answers 404 rather than 403 for a repo you cannot see, the client
reads that address anonymously, and AndroidUpdateChannel caught the failure and
returned null — which IUpdateChannel documented as meaning "this build is the
latest". The check had never once succeeded on any phone and nothing anywhere
said so.

Two faults, and the second is why the first lasted.

The seam said null was the honest answer for an unreachable channel, on the
reasoning that the caller does the same thing either way. That is true of the
six-hourly pass and false of CHECK NOW. UpdateViewModel already draws the line
correctly — silent on the timer, the exception's message on the button — and it
could only ever draw the first half, because nothing was ever thrown at it. The
desktop's channel does not catch, so the interface described neither
implementation.

So CheckAsync throws now, and null means one thing. A release that is reachable
but missing its manifest or the APK it names throws too: "you are up to date"
about a half-published feed is the same lie in a smaller costume, and the
self-healing that argument protected is untouched, since the timer still swallows
everything.

The precondition is written down where somebody would look, rather than left as a
sentence about where a token could live. ADR 0013 §4 already said a private
release repository was incompatible with this design; nobody checked which side
of it this repository was on. It is one curl, and manual-checks phase 16 now
opens with it — pointedly not against /api/v1/version, which answers 200 from a
forge that is up whatever is readable on it, and which is what made this look
like nothing was wrong.

Phone check 17.4 was the one that passed all along. It now presses CHECK NOW with
the network off as well as on, because two different answers are the whole of
what makes the first one worth reading.
2026-08-05 11:17:44 +02:00
jaap-jan b4a6c19ac1 Let the phone replace itself, and give CI a channel it may sign
ci / build and test (push) Successful in 1m53s
ci / android head (push) Failing after 32s
ci / api image (push) Successful in 28s
The Android head had no updater and no release path, and the two are one problem:
Android refuses an update signed by a different key, and CI generates a fresh debug
key in every container. An APK released from a workflow could be installed once and
never updated again — each new one an uninstall, which on this product means losing
the cache, the outbox and the device key.

So there are two channels, and they are two applications because the platform gives
no third option. dev.dodotech.dodossh is cut from a v* tag by a person running
scripts/release-android.ps1 with the key ADR 0011 rule 1 keeps off runners.
dev.dodotech.dodossh.nightly is cut from main by CI and signed with a keystore
committed here in the open — a key everybody has cannot be stolen and grants nothing
by being held, which is why putting it in CI does not touch the rule. Neither can
update the other, by construction. See ADR 0014.

The android job assumed an image with a JDK and an Android SDK on it, which is what
a GitHub runner is and what this project's is not. It now installs a JDK, fetches
Google's command-line tools, accepts the licences and installs API 36 — each a no-op
where it is already satisfied, and each cached by the persistent runner's own disk
rather than by an action that would move a quarter of a gigabyte to rebuild a
directory that never left.

The client reads a small JSON manifest beside the APK, the counterpart of
releases.win.json, and compares Android's versionCode rather than a version name:
that integer is what the platform itself uses to accept or refuse an install, so
comparing anything else would offer updates the phone then rejects. It fetches, and
then asks Android to ask — the system draws its own confirmation, and from API 26
will not draw even that until unknown sources is on for this application.

IUpdateChannel gained ApplyingEndsTheProcess. On Windows applying replaces the files
and restarts, so the shell disposes the vault first and that is what zeroes the keys.
On the phone the install is a request and the answer may be no, so disposing first
would answer "not now" with a locked keychain and every shell closed — a punishment
for declining an update.

Two measured bugs found on the way, both older than this work and both invisible to
a -getProperty check. ApplicationDisplayVersion is read by the Android targets in a
top-level PropertyGroup, so the target setting it from MinVer ran after the only
thing that reads it: every APK ever built here said versionName 1.0.0. And nothing
found so far varies the launcher name per channel — four mechanisms tried, all of
them recorded in platform-flags, none of them reaching the label the launcher shows.
The two channels share an icon name for now and are told apart by package name,
version, and what the preferences screen says.
2026-08-04 21:46:01 +02:00
jaap-jan ebb88c8ae4 Give the phone both pickers, and settle who signs the APK
The files screen could browse a remote and delete on it, and that was all: there
is no browsable local filesystem on Android for a second pane to show, so the
gesture the desktop is built around — choose on the left, press the arrow — has
nothing to stand on. What replaces it is the platform's own two pickers. ADD
FILES is ACTION_OPEN_DOCUMENT, so a document is pointed at wherever it lives and
goes to the directory showing; SAVE FILE is ACTION_CREATE_DOCUMENT for the
selected row.

Both stage through the application's cache, and that copy is a requirement
rather than a shortcut. android-port.md predicted a picked document would be a
third IRemoteFileStore beside SFTP and S3; it cannot be. FileTransferQueue seeks,
because an upload resumes from the byte the last attempt reached, and a
content:// URI has no path behind it, no length worth trusting, no promised seek
and no grant that survives the document being edited underneath it. Copying
first costs one class in the head and nothing at all in the shared layers, where
the alternative was every resume rule rewritten around a stream that cannot
rewind. The copy is deleted when the transfer completes, kept while it is stopped
so RESUME still has something to read, and swept at the next launch — which is
the one moment emptying that directory is provably safe, since nothing has
queued anything yet.

Coming out had a decision going in did not: when to ask where it goes. The save
picker is raised before the transfer, so the download runs into the same staging
directory and hands its bytes to a callback the head supplied, held against the
transfer id so a RETRY still lands where the person pointed. Asking afterwards
would put the picker minutes from the button that caused it and, on a phone,
usually while the application is backgrounded and Android will not show one at
all. The cost is that the picker creates its file when it is dismissed, so a
download that then fails leaves an empty one there; that is said on the screen,
in the README and in the manual checks rather than left to be discovered. A
delivery that fails keeps the staged bytes for the sweep instead of throwing away
the one copy of something just fetched over somebody's network.

The foreground service counts transfers now, which is the half of it that
matters most here: a shell survives backgrounding because somebody is looking at
it, and an upload has to survive precisely when nobody is. Queued counts as
active, so putting five files in and locking the phone moves five files. The
seam was built for this and wired to () => 0 because nothing could fill the
queue.

Alongside it, ADR 0010 answers the second question android-port.md left open,
and it had to be answered before the first release rather than at upload time: a
new Play app must use App Bundles and therefore Play App Signing, and an
installed app can only be updated by a package signed with the same key, so the
first release picks an identity for good. The project holds the key, offline and
never in CI — the workflow's package step now says so where somebody would break
it — and a DodoSSH deployment never serves the client, because a download link on
your own server hands the binary that holds the plaintext to the party the whole
threat model is about.

The README's M1 gap note was stale in both halves and is replaced by what is
actually true: credentials have an editor and a REMEMBER tick, and the device key
registers into the TPM under a CNG policy that makes the consent dialog a
condition of using it. What is left is the floor rather than a gap — no TPM, or
no Windows, means the passphrase on every launch.
2026-08-04 10:07:16 +02:00
jaap-jan f5ffd1983d Make Connections the place a connection is made, and put the keychain away
Four changes to the phone, and the last one needed the connect path taking
apart.

**The bottom bar is three entries.** The keychain moved onto the hub, which is
now SETTINGS with a gear rather than MORE with a hamburger. A bottom bar is for
the places a session moves between, and keys, credentials and tags are managed
occasionally and then left alone — which is the shape of everything already
behind that hub. With the keychain on it, "more" stopped being a description of
what is there. `ShellScreen.Vault` joining `IsMoreSurface` is the whole of the
change: the tab that lights, the header that stands down and the back gesture's
first case all read that one property, which is why the switch mirrors it by
construction rather than by a second list. The keychain screen grew the header
every hub screen has, because the shell's own is not above it any more and
without one there would be no back arrow and nothing saying what the list is.

The desktop keeps its Keychain rail entry. A rail with nine slots has room, so
this is the second thing the two heads arrange deliberately differently, after
the hub itself.

**Terminal became Connections**, and the word does more work than a rename
usually does — see below. The enum member stays `ShellSurface.Terminal`, for
the reason the tab was never called Vault: the surface is a terminal, and the
word a user reads is the product's.

**The + puts the software keyboard away.** It sits above a terminal somebody is
typing into, so the sheet it raises was arriving underneath a keyboard covering
the half of the screen the sheet is on — and worse, laid out into the strip
left above it, since the keyboard's inset shortens everything this head draws.
Avalonia cannot do this and it is worth knowing why: `TopLevel.InputPane`
reports the keyboard and offers nothing that closes one, because the framework's
model is that it belongs to whatever has focus — and this keyboard was raised by
the `WebView`'s own text input, by a native view Avalonia's focus manager never
owned. Clearing Avalonia's focus leaves it exactly where it is. So
`Platform/SoftKeyboard.cs` asks `InputMethodManager`, off the decor view's
window token, and every step of it is allowed to be absent.

**With nothing open, Connections is a connect screen rather than an empty
state.** A box taking `user@host` or `user@host:port`, a password, and the
machines most recently connected to underneath. The box is the only path in this
product to a machine the keychain has never heard of, which is a real case it
had no answer for: an address somebody was handed five minutes ago. A typed
password and nothing else — offering the keychain's keys would be a second
binding resolution beside `TryBuildAuthentication`, and the argument against a
second one is written there at length. Nothing typed is saved, and the screen
says so: a machine worth keeping belongs on HOSTS, where it can carry a key, a
group's defaults and a name.

The recents come out of the vault's own connection log rather than a list kept
in this process, so they survive a restart and arrive on a new phone with the
keychain. Deduplicated by address, because this is a list of places and not of
events, and capped at six so the box stays above the keyboard. Emptied when the
vault is — they are decrypted entries naming where somebody works, and a lock
that left them on screen would be a list still readable after every key that
decrypted it was zeroed. Tapping one leads to whichever of two things it is: a
keychain host goes to that host's connect bar, where its key, its password box
and its refusals already live, and an address goes back into the box, without
the password, whose absence is the point of that path rather than a gap in it.

**The connect path was shaped like `HostRowViewModel` all the way down.** The
log entry, the identification, the failure record and the retry all took a row.
They take a four-field `ConnectionTarget` now, so a connection to an address
shares the ladder of refusals, the host-key question and the tab's lifecycle
rather than growing a second copy of them. `ConnectionRecorder.Record` and
`Identify` have always taken a nullable host id, so the log could already hold a
connection with no item behind it.

One behavioural change falls out of that and it is the one to know about:
**trusting a host key now retries the attempt that raised the question** instead
of re-running whichever host is selected. That was correct while a selected host
was the only way to connect; with a manual target it would dial a different
machine, or refuse with "choose a host first" over a key the user has just
agreed to trust. The test selects a host first, so a regression cannot pass by
connecting to the wrong thing successfully.

`LogsViewModel.ReloadAsync` split so the connections half can be read alone.
Reading the keychain's activity for a screen that offers neither would double
the decryption on the list that was already the expensive one.

Twelve tests: the parse grammar as a theory over seven refusals, the dialled
request, the retry, and both branches of tapping a recent row. The recents rows
are built by hand rather than connected-and-closed — what those tests are about
is which branch a row takes, and driving it through the recorder's queue would
test the recorder, which `DodoSSH.Client.Session.Tests` already does. What needs
a device is phases 11.6 to 11.9 of `docs/manual-checks.md`.
2026-08-03 15:26:47 +02:00
jaap-janandClaude Opus 5 1db8bed872 Let a cancelled sign-in end the sign-in rather than the timeout
Backing out of the login page on Android left the shell showing "Opening your browser to
sign in…" with the button disabled for five minutes. Nothing was wrong except that nobody
told it: the redirect callback only ever completed when an intent arrived, so a user who
pressed back was waiting on OidcClient's browser timeout to expire before the flow failed
and the button came back.

There is no cancel event to subscribe to on this platform. Pressing back, dismissing the
browser and closing a provider's error page are indistinguishable from here — the browser
goes away and this application is foreground again with nothing delivered — so being
resumed while a sign-in is still waiting is the signal, and the only one there is. The
launcher records that a browser took the intent, OnResume fails the wait, and the guard
means the resumes that have nothing to do with signing in (a launch, recents, the
keystore's fingerprint prompt) go through untouched.

An exception rather than a cancellation, because OidcClient reads a cancelled wait as its
own timeout expiring and would report five minutes passing to somebody who waited two
seconds. It cannot steal a successful sign-in either: Android delivers the redirect to
OnNewIntent before resuming the activity, so the completion is already settled and the
attempt does nothing.

The enrollment key-binding trip through the browser is covered by the same change, since it
waits on the same callback.

The OnNewIntent remark had been sitting above OnResume, describing a method two below it.
Moved back, since the new remark wanted the space and the old one was wrong where it was.

Verified by building the head in Debug and Release. The behaviour itself is unverified for
the reason docs/android-port.md gives about this whole head: nothing has been run on a
device.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 21:10:37 +02:00
jaap-jan 7a3a521c59 Give the phone the rest of its screens, and a way in
ci / build and test (push) Failing after 2s
ci / android head (push) Failing after 1s
All seven screens of the design, plus the two it does not draw because it starts at an
enrolled phone: naming a server, and choosing a passphrase.

The five states docs/android-port.md worried about losing at 360dp are all here and none
of them softened. The changed-key refusal is a full-screen panel rather than a bottom
sheet, because a sheet is swipe-to-dismiss by convention and that screen must have no way
forward. The recovery code raises FLAG_SECURE for its own state and lowers it afterwards,
so the sentence about screenshots is true rather than decorative. The delete
confirmations keep their counts and replace the row in place.

Signing in works, and the seam it needed is worth more than the implementation:
IAuthorizationCallback now sits between OidcClient and the loopback listener, so the two
heads differ in where the response arrives and in nothing else. PKCE, the state check,
discovery, the token exchange and the key binding stay one implementation — a second OIDC
client would be a second place for a security bug to live. The phone registers a
private-use scheme with the system rather than binding a loopback port, which on a shared
device any other app can do first.

The accessory key row needed TerminalWorkspace.SendInputAsync: ordinary typing goes from
the renderer straight down the socket, and there was no way in for the keys a software
keyboard does not have. Ctrl latches, because one thumb cannot chord, and the latch is
drawn — a modifier that is on and does not look on is how somebody sends ^L to a database
prompt believing they typed an l.

597 client tests green, including two new ones for the input path and one for the
terminal surface command. Nothing has run on a device.
2026-07-31 21:43:11 +02:00
jaap-jan fe9d7fc289 Give DodoSSH a phone, and a shared shell for both heads to drive
The Android head from docs/android-port.md, taken as far as its step 6.

Step 3, the spike, is answered and its throwaway screen is gone: libsodium.so and
libe_sqlite3.so are both in the arm64 APK, so NSec resolves its native half on Android
despite shipping no Android build, and the local cache opens. Two findings the audit
could not have had: Avalonia.Controls.WebView only ships net10.0-android36.0, which
settles the open "which Android versions" question at targetSdk 36; and Android has
blocked cleartext HTTP since API 28, so the terminal renderer needs a network security
config scoped to 127.0.0.1 or the WebView loads nothing.

DodoSSH.Client.Shell is new and is why the phone can exist: the view models, the terminal
renderer files and the palette moved there so both heads drive one state machine and draw
from one set of tokens. The desktop head is otherwise untouched and its 144 tests still
pass.

The platform pieces behind interfaces that already existed: the profile directory from
filesDir, a device key wrapped by a StrongBox-backed key that a fingerprint releases, and
a foreground service so a shell outliving a vault lock stays true on a platform that
stops backgrounded processes.

Sign-in is deliberately absent rather than approximated. It needs an app link, because
reusing the desktop loopback listener is the attack RFC 8252 section 8.3 names.
2026-07-31 20:58:48 +02:00