nightly-desktop
5
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 jaap-jan
|
174ef7c420 | Merge branch 'claude/android-release' | ||
|
jaap-jan
|
af0e29a98b |
Give the desktop a nightly channel, the way the phone has one
ADR 0014 gave the phone a nightly and ADR 0013 rule 3 gave the desktop none, so the two heads had different answers to the same question — how does somebody try what is on main? — for no reason except the order the work happened in. This is the desktop's answer: CI publishes a build from main on every push, and it installs beside the release one rather than over it. The phone gets its separation from the platform. Android refuses an update signed by a different key, so its two channels cannot replace one another whatever anybody does. Nothing refuses anything here: Velopack applies what its feed serves and verifies no signature. So all of it is construction, and there are four separations because each closes a different door. A pack id each, so the two install in different directories and neither feed's package can be applied to the other's install. A Velopack channel each — win and win-nightly — so neither build ever reads the other's release index; the name reaches the wire as releases.win-nightly.json, which is why the constant in VelopackUpdateChannel and the argument in ci.yml have to agree or the channel answers nothing forever with no error. A prerelease flag, so the release channel cannot see the nightly even by accident. And a profile directory each, which is the one that is easy to skip and would hurt most: the cache schema is migrated on every launch, before unlock, so a shared profile means a nightly quietly upgrading a database the release build then opens. Both are installed at once by design, so that is an ordinary Tuesday rather than a corner case. The prerelease flag turns out to be load-bearing across heads as well. The phone's release channel reads releases/latest, which skips prereleases — so a desktop nightly published as a stable release would become the newest release in this repository and every phone on the release channel would start failing its check against a release carrying no Android manifest. Which build this is arrives as assembly metadata, the same mechanism and the same reasoning as the Android head: the updater needs the string rather than a branch, and a value baked into the assembly is one a crash report can be asked for. Three things read it — the feed, the prerelease flag, and the profile — and one more shows it: the titlebar says DodoSSH Nightly. Everything else that distinguishes the two is somewhere nobody is looking while typing a passphrase into one of them. The version needed a floor and it is applied to the whole build rather than to the packaging. MinVer answers 0.0.0-alpha.0.N until the first v* tag and vpk refuses anything below 0.0.1, so the job lifts the patch digit and keeps the height — through MinVerVersionOverride, so the assemblies carry the same number the installer does. Packing a version the assembly disagreed with would put one string on the preferences screen and another in the feed, which is the screen somebody reads when asked which nightly they are on. Two things found by running it rather than reading it. -t:MinVer needs a restore first, because the target arrives with the package and MSB4057 on a clean checkout reads like a typo in the workflow rather than a missing restore; the release script had the same gap and now restores before it reads. And vpk rejects an empty --packVersion loudly, which is how a broken version handoff announces itself rather than shipping a package called 1.0.0. Rule 3 is untouched. The release channel still has no job, no token and no runner, and the two channels cannot see each other. What a nightly costs is written where somebody reads it before installing one: whoever can write a release here can put a build on every nightly machine, which is fine for a build being tried and is not fine for a build holding somebody's infrastructure credentials. Verified by running the job's own steps against a clone in a Linux container: DodoSSH.Desktop.Nightly-win-nightly-Setup.exe, and an index naming pack id DodoSSH.Desktop.Nightly at 0.0.1-alpha.0.144. The upload itself is the one step not exercised — it needs a real forge and a write token, and check 16.10 is what walks the half no runner can. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
ca7fee2358 |
Start the confirmation Android hands back, so an update can install
Pressing INSTALL closed the application, installed nothing and said nothing. That is two independent faults in one method, either of which breaks it on its own, and they hid each other: the first kills the process before the second can be observed, and the second is silent by construction. The pending intent handed to commit was implicit — an action string with no component behind it. A mutable pending intent may not wrap one of those from API 34, and this head targets 36, so every current phone threw IllegalArgumentException before commit was reached. Nothing caught it, so it left the command handler, passed the dispatcher and took the process with it. That is the closing. Below 34, where it did not throw, it still installed nothing. An application holding REQUEST_INSTALL_PACKAGES rather than the privileged INSTALL_PACKAGES gets no verdict back from a commit: what the platform answers first is STATUS_PENDING_USER_ACTION, carrying the activity that draws the dialogue in EXTRA_INTENT for the application to start. Android does not draw it on its own. The comment here asserted the opposite — that a pending intent is required whether or not anything listens, and that nothing needed to — so no receiver was ever written, and the session was written, committed and left staged forever. So there is a receiver now, not exported because the only sender is this application's own commit, and the intent naming it is explicit, which is the same change that stops the throw. Sessions are abandoned when anything fails, since one created and neither committed nor abandoned stays staged against a per-application cap — a repeating fault would have started failing at CreateSession instead, which is the same bug wearing a completely unrelated face. The reporting is the part worth keeping even after the cause is gone. Where applying ends the process an exception has nowhere to go; where it does not, which is this head's whole shape, it goes out through the dispatcher. RestartNowAsync now answers the way CheckNowAsync already did, and the regression test asserts the absence of a throw rather than the presence of one. ADR 0014 rule 6 gets the correction in place: "asks Android to ask" is one step longer than it reads. Check 17.5 needed no rewording — it asks for the installer appearing by name, which is exactly the thing that never happened — so what it gets instead is the two symptoms named, because both present as a dead button. It is the only thing in the project that can catch either, and it plainly was never run against a real pair of builds. Note for whoever takes the next nightly: a broken updater cannot install its own fix. The phone is running the code this commit replaces, so the first build carrying it has to be sideloaded by hand; the ones after that install normally. Compile-verified and manifest-verified — the receiver reaches the generated manifest — and 321 tests pass. Not run on a device, which is what 17.5 is for. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
9a7e3bbd5c |
Let a failed update check say so, instead of reporting good news
The phone reported every build as current because the release repository is private. Gitea answers 404 rather than 403 for a repo you cannot see, the client reads that address anonymously, and AndroidUpdateChannel caught the failure and returned null — which IUpdateChannel documented as meaning "this build is the latest". The check had never once succeeded on any phone and nothing anywhere said so. Two faults, and the second is why the first lasted. The seam said null was the honest answer for an unreachable channel, on the reasoning that the caller does the same thing either way. That is true of the six-hourly pass and false of CHECK NOW. UpdateViewModel already draws the line correctly — silent on the timer, the exception's message on the button — and it could only ever draw the first half, because nothing was ever thrown at it. The desktop's channel does not catch, so the interface described neither implementation. So CheckAsync throws now, and null means one thing. A release that is reachable but missing its manifest or the APK it names throws too: "you are up to date" about a half-published feed is the same lie in a smaller costume, and the self-healing that argument protected is untouched, since the timer still swallows everything. The precondition is written down where somebody would look, rather than left as a sentence about where a token could live. ADR 0013 §4 already said a private release repository was incompatible with this design; nobody checked which side of it this repository was on. It is one curl, and manual-checks phase 16 now opens with it — pointedly not against /api/v1/version, which answers 200 from a forge that is up whatever is readable on it, and which is what made this look like nothing was wrong. Phone check 17.4 was the one that passed all along. It now presses CHECK NOW with the network off as well as on, because two different answers are the whole of what makes the first one worth reading. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
b4a6c19ac1 |
Let the phone replace itself, and give CI a channel it may sign
The Android head had no updater and no release path, and the two are one problem: Android refuses an update signed by a different key, and CI generates a fresh debug key in every container. An APK released from a workflow could be installed once and never updated again — each new one an uninstall, which on this product means losing the cache, the outbox and the device key. So there are two channels, and they are two applications because the platform gives no third option. dev.dodotech.dodossh is cut from a v* tag by a person running scripts/release-android.ps1 with the key ADR 0011 rule 1 keeps off runners. dev.dodotech.dodossh.nightly is cut from main by CI and signed with a keystore committed here in the open — a key everybody has cannot be stolen and grants nothing by being held, which is why putting it in CI does not touch the rule. Neither can update the other, by construction. See ADR 0014. The android job assumed an image with a JDK and an Android SDK on it, which is what a GitHub runner is and what this project's is not. It now installs a JDK, fetches Google's command-line tools, accepts the licences and installs API 36 — each a no-op where it is already satisfied, and each cached by the persistent runner's own disk rather than by an action that would move a quarter of a gigabyte to rebuild a directory that never left. The client reads a small JSON manifest beside the APK, the counterpart of releases.win.json, and compares Android's versionCode rather than a version name: that integer is what the platform itself uses to accept or refuse an install, so comparing anything else would offer updates the phone then rejects. It fetches, and then asks Android to ask — the system draws its own confirmation, and from API 26 will not draw even that until unknown sources is on for this application. IUpdateChannel gained ApplyingEndsTheProcess. On Windows applying replaces the files and restarts, so the shell disposes the vault first and that is what zeroes the keys. On the phone the install is a request and the answer may be no, so disposing first would answer "not now" with a locked keychain and every shell closed — a punishment for declining an update. Two measured bugs found on the way, both older than this work and both invisible to a -getProperty check. ApplicationDisplayVersion is read by the Android targets in a top-level PropertyGroup, so the target setting it from MinVer ran after the only thing that reads it: every APK ever built here said versionName 1.0.0. And nothing found so far varies the launcher name per channel — four mechanisms tried, all of them recorded in platform-flags, none of them reaching the label the launcher shows. The two channels share an icon name for now and are told apart by package name, version, and what the preferences screen says. |