nightly
20
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 jaap-jan
|
c8507b44fe | Give the application a settings area built from what really exists | ||
|
jaap-jan
|
281e828e25 | Sweep out the group-card navigation nothing reaches any more | ||
|
jaap-jan
|
e750ba05e3 | Merge branch 'claude/edit-screen-refresh-items-63a808' | ||
|
jaap-jan
|
6d6edb02c1 |
Keep an open editor's pickers in step with the vault
The host editor's four pickers were snapshots taken when it opened, and the comment on EditorAuthenticationChoices said why: a picker whose contents move under somebody halfway through a form is worse than a list a minute stale, and only one editor could be open at a time anyway, so the only way to add a key was to close this one. The second half of that stopped being true when AHostEditorIsInTheWay was split from AVaultEditorIsInTheWay. The host editor is the Hosts screen's business and the keychain's editors are the Vault screen's; neither refuses the other now, which was the right split — it stopped three quarters of a screen going inert over an editor the user was not looking at — but it left the assumption those snapshots rested on false and nothing to notice. So the ordinary way of using the feature was the broken one. Somebody starts editing a host, finds there is no key to bind it to, goes to KEYS, makes one, and comes back to a picker that does not have it — with the fix being to throw the form away and start again. The same for a password, a tag, a group, and for a whole vault made on the Teams screen because the host being typed belongs to the team rather than to the person typing it: the vault they had just made for it was the one place they could not file it. RefreshOpenEditors refills whichever editor is open, and it hangs off ReloadAsync rather than off the twenty-odd commands that write to the vault. That is the choice worth stating, because it is what makes a sync count as well as a save: a key pulled from another machine reaches the open editor by the same path a key typed here does, and a place that wrote to the vault without refreshing the editor would be a bug nobody would find for months. What the old comment was protecting against is real, so every picker is put back onto what it was already showing, by id, and not one typed field is touched. An editor that reset its own bindings because a background sync landed would be a worse bug than the stale list this fixes — it would rebind a host as a side effect of somebody else's work. The placeholder entries go back too, which is the case 3.4 measures: a group deleted on another machine mid-edit still cannot unfile the host when the form is saved. The group editor gets the same treatment for the same reasons; it shares the drawer, and its default binding is lent to every host under it. The snippet editor's vault picker was the same copy of the same list and went stale the same way. It watches TargetVaults rather than the reload, because that screen has always been a wrapper over the vault's collections and has no reload of its own to hang off — which is how it already follows Snippets. The move panels are deliberately left alone. A vault arriving from a sync while one is open still will not appear in it, but a move panel is opened by the act that fills it and its picker resets its selection to the first entry on every rebuild, so refreshing it would move a destination somebody had chosen. Same class of bug, different answer, and not this change. Five tests, and four of them were checked failing with the RefreshOpenEditors call commented out: a key reaching the open host editor and binding when chosen, an item arriving without moving a selection that was already made, a tag arriving as an unworn chip, a key reaching the group editor, and a vault reaching the host and snippet editors without moving either. Manual check 7.12 sits beside 7.11, which is this same bug on the files screen's picker, and says what the worse failure would look like: a picker that moves rather than one that does not notice. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
808a9a7fc1 |
Open a new host in the vault of the group it is being made in
+ NEW HOST decided two defaults separately and let them contradict each other. The group came from the screen — the selected card, or failing that the group whose contents are showing — and the vault came from the keychain screen's standing "new items go to" preference. Inside a group belonging to any other vault the two disagreed, and the group is what lost: GroupInEditingVault drops a group the editor's vault has not got, on the sound reasoning that a host filed under an id its readers cannot resolve looks unfiled to everybody but the person who wrote it. So pressing the button while standing inside a team's PLATFORM opened a form filed under nothing, bound for the personal vault, with no sentence anywhere saying either thing had happened. The vault now follows the group. A group lives in exactly one vault, so a host that is to land in that group has to be sealed in that vault too — which is the rule + NEW GROUP has followed for a parent since the cards became a tree, and the comment there claiming this as a deliberate difference from the host's editor is the one the code has now caught up with. The filter stays, because there is one case left for it: the group's vault may be one this session can read and not write, a team vault this account is a viewer of. TargetVaults is the readable-and-writable set and is what decides here, so a viewer keeps the standing preference and loses the group with it, rather than opening an editor aimed at a save that cannot happen. Both directions are tested, since one alone would not say which default wins: standing in a shared vault's group, the editor opens on that vault with the group selected and the host saves there; and with the preference pointed at the shared vault while a personal-vault group is open, the group beats the picker somebody set once. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
f1d6499bb5 |
Merge branch 'main'
Two of main's changes land in files this branch rewrote, and both needed carrying across by hand rather than by the merge. The phone's nav staying up on Connections with nothing running is a fourth input to RefreshChrome, which this branch had already given two more — whether hosts are ticked and whether the host editor is filling the screen. They compose: the rail and the bottom bar now ask (pages || connectPage) && !editing, so a page-shaped terminal surface keeps its way off the screen and the editor still takes the whole display. The key question under the host's move panel is the harder one, because this branch deleted the panel it was added to. The connect card is gone and the phone's only route to a move is the action bar, so leaving the merge to take this side would have removed a capability main had just shipped — silently, since nothing would fail to build. It is asked in the action bar's own picker instead, in two shapes fewer than the desktop's: one host, because which key to carry is a fact about one machine and a selection of six has six answers, and a move rather than a copy, because taking the key out from under an original that is staying put would leave that original unable to connect. BindingOfTheMovingHost splits into MovableBindingOf so both heads answer it the same way from different panels. Main also fixed a real trap in the same commit — a host that only inherited its key from its group arrived in the destination naming nothing at all, because the group stays behind — and the batch move had the same bug for the same reason. It goes through Detached now, which is where that fix lives. The carried host is written as the carry left it rather than being detached again, which is the one thing worth measuring: the key takes a new id over there, so a run that rebuilt the payload from the row would send the machine across naming a tombstone. Both directions are pinned, along with the rule about which shapes the question is asked in at all. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
c882fa0cd3 |
Give the phone a selection instead of a card under the list
A long press on a host raised a connect card over the bottom of the list: a password box, CONNECT, EDIT, MOVE and DELETE. It was the right idea in the wrong place. It covered rows, it had room for five things and never a sixth, and every one of them was about exactly one machine — so filing eleven imported hosts under a group was eleven trips through a form, and there was nowhere to put a sixth action if anybody wanted one. A long press now chooses the host it landed on, and the actions move into a bar across the top of the screen, in the vault header's place rather than beside it. That is where Android has put them since contextual action bars existed, and it is the one strip a list can never grow into — but the real reason for it is that while it is up the screen is unambiguously about the ticked hosts and nothing else, which is what lets the count in the middle of it mean something. Left to right: the cross that leaves the mode, the count, the pencil, and a ⋯ holding Connect, Connect via SFTP, Move to vault, Copy to vault, Change group, Duplicate and Remove. A tap still connects and still raises nothing. Once anything is ticked it ticks and unticks instead, which is what every Android list does and is not merely a convention worth following: a tap that connected while five machines sat ticked would open a terminal on top of a selection somebody was halfway through building. Unticking the last host leaves the mode, so there are two ways out of it and the cross is only one of them. Both gestures now read the row from the element under the finger rather than from the list's selection, and that is a correctness change rather than tidying. A tap on a group heading moves the selection and the view model bounces it straight back to whichever host was chosen before — which answered "a host, or nothing" for free while a tap only ever connected. It stops answering it the moment a tap can tick one: the heading would tick a machine the user was not pointing at, into a set they are about to delete. Three of the seven entries are about one machine and are drawn only for one. A terminal, a file-transfer session and a form each have no reading over six, so they are collapsed rather than refused. The other four read better for a count than without one — it is the reason the set exists — and each of them says afterwards how many hosts it wrote and how many it left alone. Skipping beats refusing the whole run: a selection of eleven with one read-only row would otherwise do nothing at all and then report about the wrong ten. Copy to vault and Duplicate are new, and the difference between them is what each can safely carry. A copy crosses a key boundary, so it drops the group and the tags exactly as a move does — both are items of the vault being left, and a host arriving with either would point at something the destination does not contain, resolvable on the machine that sent it and dangling for everybody else. A duplicate stays in the same keychain, so everything it points at is still there and it keeps both. Change group is the write dragging a card onto a group already makes on the desktop, run over a selection; it refuses one spanning two keychains rather than half-filing it, which is the refusal a drop across that boundary already makes one host at a time. Connect via SFTP is the one action that leaves the vault. Which machine is a decrypted item and so is this object's business; the screen it leads to and the transfers view model behind it are the shell's — so it is an event, on the same division SessionOpened already draws for a shell. The host is re-found in that screen's own copy of the list, because the picker binds to rows in that copy and handing it the vault's object would select nothing. What is left of the card is the password box, and only because it had nowhere else to go: a host that authenticates with a typed password cannot be reached by a tap alone. That tap now raises a sheet rather than the bar, and the difference is that a sheet is up only while a question is on screen — the bar was raised by a long press and stayed, so it was a password box sitting over the list whether or not anything was being asked. Dismissing it empties the box, which is not tidiness either: a secret left behind would satisfy the emptiness check that decides whether to raise the sheet at all, so the next tap would dial with somebody else's password. The pencil moving into that bar takes the host editor with it. It was a card in the list's own row, under the search box and the sync line — twenty controls sharing a screen with two rows of chrome about the list it had replaced. It is a page now, and PhoneShell stands all four of its rows down for it, which is what "opens with all the options" means at 360dp. That needed a second subscription in that control: two of its flags are questions about the vault rather than about the shell, and the shell does not forward the vault's notifications. The ticks are held as entity ids rather than as rows, and written back onto the rows after every reload. Every row object in the list is replaced on every filter keystroke and every synchronisation pass, so a set of rows would empty itself once a minute under somebody choosing what to do with eleven machines. Ids that no longer resolve are dropped, so a colleague's deletion arriving mid-selection leaves a count that matches what is on screen. One caller had to change with it. ConnectToRecent opened the pane about a host, which was the desktop's drawer and the phone's card; the phone's answer is now a tick, and nothing on that list means "selected" any more — so arriving with the host merely selected would be arriving at a screen with nothing to press. Both are raised together, and the one the head in front of the user does not draw is inert. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
69858f82d1 | Merge branch 'claude/vault-key-sync-sharing-d098aa' | ||
|
jaap-jan
|
185790fb14 |
Let a key move to another vault, and ask whether it goes with the host
Keys sync and keys are shared: SshKey is in the sync registry on both sides, the material rides in the sealed payload, and every generation of the vault key is wrapped to a new member. What was missing was the way in. Hosts and groups could move between vaults and keychain items could not, so a key typed into a personal vault before the team existed stayed there for good — and moving a host into the team's vault left it authenticating with something nobody else in that vault can read. The code said so and could do nothing about it: "the answer is usually to put a copy of that key in the destination vault", which meant pasting the private half into a second item and deleting the first. A private key on a clipboard, and two items nobody can tell apart afterwards. MoveAsync already existed on the generic repository and is now exposed for keys and passwords as it is for hosts and groups. What had to be built around it is the re-aim. An item re-sealed under another vault's key lands with an id of that vault's making, so every host bound to the old one and every group lending it as a default is left naming a tombstone — and a host bound to something its vault no longer holds refuses to connect rather than falling back to a typed password. A move without the re-aim would look like a success and break every machine on that key. It runs over every vault this session can write to, because a binding resolves across all of them, and it counts what it could not rewrite: an item from a newer client, or one in a vault this account may only read. Those are said in the sentence afterwards rather than swallowed. The host's move asks the question rather than deciding it. A binding resolves across vaults, so the moved host goes on working for the person who moved it whichever way this is answered; it is the colleagues they have just joined who hold one vault's key and cannot connect with a host whose key stayed behind. Unticked, and it stays that way on purpose: moving a key into a team's vault hands it to everybody holding that key, and this design does not default anybody into a disclosure. Under the box is the count of everything else that authenticates with that key, because a key twenty machines use is a different decision from one nothing else touches, and neither number is visible from the panel otherwise. The question is answered against the vault in the picker, so choosing a different destination re-asks it and a key already in the destination offers nothing. One thing fixed on the way. A host that inherited its key from its group arrived in the destination naming nothing at all — the group belongs to the vault it left — so a machine that connected before the move refused after it, with no sentence anywhere saying why. The resolved binding is now written onto the host as it crosses, and the stranded-binding warning reads the resolved binding too, which is the case where somebody is least likely to know a key is involved. MOVE is on both heads, for keys and passwords only: a tag, a bucket and a pin are read from the active vault alone, so "another vault" is not a question any of them has. Four tests cover the move and its re-aim, the host's move with the key brought and without it, and the inherited binding. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
3d9ed03b09 |
Let a snippet be shared to a vault, the way a host already can
A snippet was a first-class vault item everywhere except where it mattered: the crypto, the sync, the server table and every registry already treated it exactly as they treat a host, and the screen read it out of the active vault alone. So the one command a team most obviously wants to hold in common — the incantation somebody worked out once and everybody else retypes — was the only item kind that could not leave the machine that wrote it. The read is the half that had to come first, and it is why this is not simply a MoveAsync. ReloadSnippetsAsync now lists every readable vault rather than the active one, in the shape ReloadHostsAsync and ReloadKeysAsync already use: the vault new items go into first, then by vault name, then by label, with a badge on the row only where there is more than one vault to tell apart. Without that, a snippet moved into a team vault would have disappeared from the very screen that moved it, and one a colleague wrote there would never have arrived at all — sharing would have looked like losing. Three writes were pinned to the active vault and each one broke differently once the list spanned several. The delete tombstoned in the wrong vault, which tombstones nothing and leaves the snippet on screen. The save is the bad one: an update sent to the active vault creates a second snippet there and leaves the team original untouched, so the person editing sees their fix and nobody else ever does. That is a fork with no symptom, which is why the vault is now a parameter and the screen latches it when the editor opens — the chosen vault for a new snippet, the row own vault for an existing one — rather than reading it back off a selection that can move under a half-typed form. VaultViewModel has carried editingHostVaultId for the same reason since hosts crossed vaults. Two controls rather than one, and that is the same line the host pane draws. The editor asks which vault a new snippet is filed into; MOVE re-seals an existing one under another key and tombstones the first. Putting the second inside the first would let somebody correcting a typo hand a command to a team by leaving a picker where they found it, so the picker is not drawn for an existing snippet at all. Both live on SnippetsViewModel rather than VaultViewModel because this screen owns its editor, unlike the host drawer; the writing they ask for is still the vault. A snippet crosses whole, which is the one way this is simpler than the host it copies. A host leaves its group and its tags behind because both are items of the vault it came from and would dangle for everybody in the destination. A snippet is a label, a command and a note, and none of them points at anything — so there is nothing to strip, nothing to report as left behind, and what the copy says instead is the thing that is actually at stake: who can read the command afterwards. For a command that may carry a hostname or a path, that is the whole decision. Two judgement calls worth finding later. A hidden vault now hides its snippets, filtered in the screen projection rather than in VaultViewModel.Snippets, which is the rule keys and passwords already follow: the list stays whole so nothing that resolves against it breaks, and the projection is what a preference about reading gets to change. And the nav rail count is left spanning vaults unfiltered, because Vault.Hosts.Count beside it is unfiltered too — filtering one of the four would make the rail disagree with itself. Four flow tests in VaultSharingTests, beside the host ones they mirror: the move re-seals with a new id and carries the runs-on-insert flag across, the move with nowhere to go refuses rather than opening an empty picker, the editor files into the vault chosen on it, and the edit of a shared snippet goes back to its own vault instead of forking. That last one is the regression the latch exists for and the only one whose absence has no visible symptom. Plus a layout test with the move panel open, since that paragraph wraps in a 300-pixel column and the desktop pane it lands in is measured. The whole suite passes: 1660 tests, none failing. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
69bc9e270b |
Let a team be joined only by somebody who is already here
An invitation decided access from an assertion about an address. Everything else
in this model decides it from something a person did — an admin naming an
account, a key holder wrapping a vault key to a key they verified — and this was
the one place a token's email claim was the thing that let somebody in.
It was guarded as tightly as that can be guarded: the claim was refused outright
on an unverified or absent `email_verified`, with no setting to relax it. But the
guard and the risk were the same shape. The whole defence was one boolean sent by
a system the deployment does not control.
So `POST /teams/{id}/members` is the only way in, and an address with no account
is refused with `no-such-account` — which is now the end of the road rather than
the signal to invite. Both clients say the remedy: that person signs in here
once, which is what creates the account, and then they can be added. The desktop
leaves the address in the box, because a message telling you to come back later
is one you act on later.
Gone with it: the `team_invitation` table, the claim hook in the sign-in path,
and `Oidc:EmailVerifiedClaim`, which that hook was the only reader of. Nothing in
the server now reads the email claim to decide anything.
Pending invitations are dropped rather than converted. Converting one would mean
creating a membership because an address matched, which is the property being
removed — and an invitation to an address that did have an account here had
already been claimed by the hourly sweep, so what is left is offers to people who
never arrived.
Two tests carry the property rather than the feature: the endpoint inventory
asserts the three routes are absent, and the API suite adds an address that has
no account, watches the refusal, then signs that address in and checks it joined
nothing. Without the second half, a server that merely renamed the deferred path
would pass.
|
||
|
jaap-jan
|
50fa6fba38 |
Let the phone delete a host, and move or remove a group
The desktop gained three things the phone did not follow: moving a group to another vault, the second question asking whether a group's deletion takes its hosts with it, and — since long before either — deleting a host at all. What that left was a head whose v3 + can fill a keychain and whose editors can correct one, with no way to empty either. The commands could not simply be bound. DeleteGroup and MoveGroup aim at GroupTarget, which is the selected card or the open group, and the phone has neither: its list draws headings, and a heading's selection deliberately bounces back to the host. Called bare on that head they would have returned having done nothing — a DELETE that appears to have been pressed and has not. Both now take the row and fall back to GroupTarget for the desktop's menu, and ConfirmMoveGroupAsync resolves from the panel's own movingGroupId rather than from the selection, which is also the honester answer on the desktop: what moves is the shelf the panel was opened on. The heading's pencil became a menu. Three icons after a chevron, a name, a vault badge and a count is what would be left of the name at 360dp, so the ⋯ raises the add sheet's shape carrying Edit, Move to another vault, a rule, and Delete — the desktop's card menu, in the one idiom this screen already has. It does not carry Open: the desktop's grid holds one level of the group tree and this list holds all of it flattened, so there is nowhere to open a group into. DELETE under a host sits on a row of its own beneath EDIT and MOVE rather than beside them. A phone has no hover and no tooltip, so where a thumb lands is the only thing separating a destructive control from an ordinary one. Both questions take the controls that asked them — ShowsConnectControls, which is the phone's half of the rule ShowsHostPaneActions already carries for the desktop's drawer — so DELETE cannot be pressed a second time underneath its own confirmation. Preferences gained the running version, and the sentence saying this head does not replace itself and that no DodoSSH server will ever offer one. It reads Updates.CurrentVersion off the same view model the desktop's UPDATES section does, over the null channel that reports itself unsupported. Nothing was needed for the realtime push: it is composed in ServerConnection, which both heads use. Seven tests, all phone-shaped — a group acted on with nothing selected, the menu waved away leaving nothing armed, the ungrouped heading raising none, and the bar's three states. The rectangles remain unmeasurable for the reason phase 8 gives; the checks for them are 8.10 to 8.13 and 13.6. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
780f4bf892 |
Merge branch 'main' into the group's move and its deletion question
Main took the group's EDIT and DELETE off the GROUPS heading while this branch was adding a MOVE beside them, so the conflict was about the same six pixels from both directions. Main's answer wins outright, and it is the better one for the reason its own message gives: a button beside a heading has no card under a pointer to mean, and had to work its subject out from the selection or from the trail. Moving a group had that problem worst of all — the thing it takes with it is everything on the shelf, and "which shelf" is not a question a button there could answer plainly. So the MOVE button is gone and the menu entry it was drawn beside is the whole of it. That entry was already in this branch, above the separator DELETE sits below, and it needed no change: the card menu selects whatever was right-clicked before it runs anything, which is exactly the aiming a group move wants. Three things went with the button. ShowsGroupActions, which main deleted because hiding buttons was all it did, and which this branch had extended to hide them for the move panel as well. CanMoveGroupTarget, which existed to answer whether that button was worth drawing — CanMoveSelectedHost stays, because the phone really does leave the host's MOVE out rather than offer a refusal, and a menu whose entries came and went would be a menu whose items move. And the two test assertions that read them, which were describing the button rather than the behaviour; what they were guarding is that the two panels never share the moment, and IsConfirmingGroupDeletion says that directly. The move panel and the deletion question both keep their place under the heading, which is where the buttons were and is now simply where that section puts things. They still exclude each other, by disarming rather than by a visibility flag: MoveGroup clears a pending deletion and DeleteGroup folds the move panel away. Manual checks 3.3 was rewritten by main for the menu and by this branch for the tick, and now says both; 3.3a is new and walks a two-level shelf across a vault boundary, which is the half of this feature no headless test can watch land. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
a86731ee08 |
Move the shelf as well as what is on it, and ask what a deletion takes
Two things about a group, and they turn out to be the same argument twice. **A group can be moved to another vault, and it takes everything on it.** The host's move shipped last week and stopped one level too low: moving twenty machines into a shared vault meant twenty trips through a menu, and each one arrived stripped of the group it had been filed under, so the shelf had to be rebuilt by hand on the other side. Moving the shelf is what people were attempting. MOVE sits between EDIT and DELETE over the group cards, and on the card's own menu above the separator DELETE is below — the same place, and the same reasoning, as the host pane's ⋯ entry. **The whole subtree goes, and taking less was never coherent.** A group's children are items of the vault it is leaving, so a parent moved alone leaves them naming a tombstone and they surface as roots in the vault the user has just emptied: half a shelf here and half there, from one gesture that said "move this". The hosts are the same argument and are the half the request was about. The groups go first, top down, and the hosts last. Each item is re-sealed under the destination's key and takes a new id — VaultItemRepository.MoveAsync, which HostGroupRepository now exposes — so nothing pointing at a group can be written until that group has landed and its new id is known, and a child's parent must already be over there. What an interruption leaves is therefore hosts still in the vault they started in, under UNGROUPED: visible, and re-movable. The reverse order would leave hosts in the destination filed under nothing. The parent stays behind and the tags are dropped, which is the host move's rule one level up: both are items of the vault being left, so a reference carried across would resolve on the machine that moved it and dangle for everybody else in the destination. The moved group arrives at the top level, and the panel says so before the press rather than the status line saying it after. Keys and passwords are kept — those genuinely resolve across vaults, and clearing them would take a working host and make one that cannot connect — and any now outside the destination is named, because that is precisely what the other members of it will not be able to resolve. Refused as a whole where anything under the group was written by a newer client, rather than skipped item by item: a move that left behind what it could not re-encode would file some of the shelf in one vault and the rest in the other, which is the state this exists to prevent. Refused with a host editor open, as the drop gesture is, because it rewrites hosts. And the walk carries a visited set, for the reason every walk over this tree does: a group that is its own parent — which two offline clients can build and no editor was ever shown — would otherwise be appended to the move list for as long as there was memory. **Deleting a group now asks what should become of the hosts under it, and that reverses a decision this repository had written down.** The deletion did not touch them: the reference was left dangling, the list resolved it to nothing, and the machines turned up under UNGROUPED. That was right for one of the two things people delete a group for and wrong for the other — a heading being tidied away should leave its machines alone, and a project that has been decommissioned is a shelf and everything on it — and nothing in the code can tell which of the two it is looking at. So it is asked. A tick rather than a pair of options, because the two answers are not equally weighted: keeping the hosts is recoverable and deleting them is not, so the safe answer is the one that needs no decision. It is off on every question, including the one that disarms it, or a tick left standing would destroy the next group's machines on the strength of a decision about the last one's. Once the deletion knows which hosts it means, leaving them naming something that has gone is a state kept for no reason, so the unticked answer writes too: N hosts with the reference cleared, where the ticked one writes N tombstones. That is the N writes HostGroupRepository refuses to hide behind a DeleteAsync overload, made where somebody asked for them and where the count is on screen first. The nested groups take the deleted group's place in the tree rather than being orphaned to the top level. A read-only host is skipped, counted and named, because unfiling it would re-encode a payload this build cannot represent — and the cost of skipping is a dangling id, which every reader here already survives. **Both are the desktop's alone**, and that is not an omission. The phone draws groups as headings in the host list and has never had a way to delete or move one; the two panels take the row of buttons over the group cards, and there is no such row on a 360dp screen to take. One test had to change its premise rather than its assertion. EditingAHostWhoseGroupIsGone built its dangling reference by deleting the group, which now unfiles instead — so it imports a host naming an id nothing resolves, which is what a group deleted on another machine actually looks like and is the only way that state still arises. The picker's placeholder is still needed and still covered. Four places said an item could not be moved between vaults. Two were about a group and were true when written; the other two were left stale by the host's move. All four now say what is true, including the design gaps document, where the chevron beside the vault name stays undrawn for the reason it already had. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
0258ec3029 |
Merge branch 'claude/groups-vault-sharing-e4b154'
# Conflicts: # src/DodoSSH.Client.Shell/ViewModels/VaultViewModel.cs |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
c39df3f51e |
Share the shelf as well as what is on it, and ask a group which vault
A group is where hosts are filed and what lends them a port, a username and a key, and until now it could only ever be made in the vault this machine files new items into. So sharing a vault shared the machines and not the arrangement: a colleague opened four hosts filed under a group they could read the name of and nothing else, and the group a teammate made had no card, no heading and no way to be corrected from the screen looking straight at the hosts inside it. Recorded as half shipped in docs/design-import-gaps.md, and this is the other half. The list stopped being the active vault's. It was narrow for two stated reasons — a row shown across vaults has to carry which vault it lives in, because rename and delete both need it, and two vaults may hold a "production" each, which a layout with one heading per group cannot tell apart — and both are now paid for rather than avoided. Every row carries its vault, the badge beside the name says which, and the two cards sit side by side saying what they are. The three shapes of the group read are now deliberately different sizes. The list is what a person looks at, so a hidden vault's groups leave it: a card that cannot be opened onto anything is worse than no card. The per-vault lists are what a picker offers, because a picker is always asking about one vault. The map is what a host's GroupId resolves through, and it stays widest of all — including over hidden vaults, since a group lends a port and hiding a vault must never change what one of its hosts dials. RebuildGroups is the one place hiding is applied, which is what keeps those answers apart. The editor asks which vault on the terms the host editor's picker set: while adding only, hidden where there is one writable vault, and never offered afterwards, because the two are encrypted under different keys and moving an item is a delete and a retype. Its parent picker is that vault's alone, for the reason the host editor's group picker is one level down — a parent in another vault is a level half the key holders cannot resolve, and their hosts would inherit from nothing. + NEW GROUP inside an open group departs from NewHost and takes that group's vault rather than the standing preference: a group made inside another is in its parent's vault by construction, and answering "inside PLATFORM" with a group elsewhere and no parent would drop the one thing the button said. Two smaller things follow from the cards spanning vaults. Dragging a host onto a group card in another vault is refused with both names, because the write it would make is exactly the id-nobody-can-resolve the host editor's picker was fixed to prevent, and treating it as "no group" would unfile a host somebody was plainly filing. And a group being renamed says its vault in the drawer's header, since the picker is not drawn for an existing one and renaming a colleague's shelf without being told whose it is is the edit most worth naming. The save target is a nullable field behind a property that falls back to the standing preference. The group name box is bound whether or not anything raised an editor over it — that is what the desktop's group bar was, and typing a name into it and pressing ADD is still a way to make a group, which would otherwise have written to no vault at all. 1575 tests pass, five more than before: a group filed into a shared vault is listed and renamed there, the editor's picker does not move the keychain screen's, the parent picker offers only its own vault, a cross-vault drop is refused, and hiding a vault takes the cards without changing what its hosts dial. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
bee6202949 |
Let a host be moved to another vault
The one thing the host editor's vault picker has always been unable to offer, and the comment beside it said so: an existing host's vault was not a field because the two vaults are encrypted under different keys. That is still true. What changed is that it is no longer a reason to have nothing. **A move is a copy and a tombstone, and it cannot be anything else.** A payload is sealed under its vault's key and its AAD binds the vault, the entity id and the item version, so no edit moves one and no server call could — the server holds ciphertext it cannot read. What crosses is the plaintext, in this process, between an unwrap under one key and a seal under another. VaultItemRepository gained MoveAsync for it, so the three decisions below live in one place with their reasons rather than being re-derived at each call site. The item takes a new id. Keeping it would put one entity id in two vaults, and the item table is keyed on the type and the id rather than on the vault — so the destination's row and the source's tombstone would be the same row, and the move would delete what it had just written. The write comes first and the tombstone second, which decides what an interruption leaves: a copy in both vaults, visible and deletable, rather than a tombstone with nothing on the other side. Both are queued rather than sent, so the window is a crash between two local writes; it is still worth being on the survivable side of. Two activity lines rather than one, because that is what the two vaults actually record. A single "moved" line would have to be written to one of them and would be missing from the other's history. **The group and the tags stay behind, and that is the half that makes this honest.** Both are items of the vault the host is leaving: the editor's group picker offers one vault's groups and the chips are drawn from one vault's tags. A host carrying either across would resolve it on the machine that moved it — groups and tags are resolved over every readable vault — and dangle for everybody else in the destination. The mover and their colleagues would be looking at two different hosts. Cleared and reported beats carried and invisible. The key or password binding is kept, and the difference is not inconsistency. Those genuinely resolve across vaults — one key on twenty hosts in three vaults is the arrangement they exist for — so clearing them would take a working host and make one that cannot connect. What the message does instead is name a binding that is now outside the destination, because that is precisely what the other members of it will not be able to resolve. **It is not in the editor**, on either head: the desktop puts it in the detail pane's ⋯ menu above the separator Delete sits below, and the phone beside EDIT. A picker inside the form would move a machine as a side effect of correcting a port, which is the bug the editor's own vault picker was fenced off to prevent in the first place. The panel takes the footer as the deletion question does, and says what will be left behind before the tap rather than after it — on a phone, where the status line afterwards is one line on a screen somebody has already navigated away from, that is the only place it reliably gets read. The phone hides the button where there is nowhere to go rather than offering one that answers with a refusal; the desktop keeps its menu entry either way, because a menu that grew and shrank would be a menu whose items move. One thing found while writing the test and deliberately not changed. The pass that follows every write on this screen reports what it moved and supersedes the confirmation — for a save and a delete as much as for a move — so the move's own sentence is what somebody sees offline. The test asserts it in that state and says why. Making confirmations survive their own sync pass is a question about the whole screen rather than about this. Four places said an item could never be moved, two of them sentences on screen in both heads. All four now say what is true, including the design gaps document, where the chevron beside the vault name stays undrawn for a different reason: a chevron on a subtitle implies an edit, and this is a re-seal, a new id and two references left behind. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
e9cea2ccbc |
Let a shared vault arrive, a bucket be found, and a vault be deleted
Three things a user reported, one of which was a real bug and one of which was
not the bug it looked like.
**A vault shared with somebody never reached their machine.** The grant was
correct at both ends: the sharing client verified the recipient's key against the
key log and wrapped every generation to it, the server stored it, and /me would
have returned it. Nothing asked. VaultSession.RefreshVaultsAsync — the method
whose own summary says it is "called after a share and on a periodic pass" — had
no caller anywhere in the application, so the vault list was whatever the last
browser sign-in cached. A restart did not help: an offline unlock reads that same
cache. The vault appeared only if the recipient happened to sign in through the
browser again, which is why this looked like sharing being broken rather than
like a list that was never re-read.
So every synchronisation pass now re-reads it, before it syncs. SyncOnceAsync
takes the whole server rather than its sync half for that reason, and the order
matters: a vault admitted by the refresh is one that same pass then pulls, where
the other order would show a newly shared vault as an empty one until the minute
after. The shell is told only when the set actually changed — it rebuilds the tab
strip's vault menu from the session's list, and doing that on every quiet pass
would rebuild a menu once a minute for nothing.
The test needed the fake server to be able to do something no test here had
needed before: hand this account a vault it did not make. ShareVaultWithMe wraps
a real key to the encryption key this account enrolled, so the keyring opens it
exactly as it opens a real colleague's — a helper that filled the field with
bytes would let a vault appear in the list and never prove it could be read.
**Adding an S3 bucket on the desktop works, and could not be found.** The report
was that it is not possible; driving the real XAML headlessly says otherwise —
Keychain, + BUCKET, and the editor saves. What is true is that S3 is where
somebody goes looking, and from there SELECT BUCKET opened a combo box with
nothing in it and no sentence anywhere saying that a bucket is a keychain item.
From where the user was standing that is indistinguishable from an application
with no way to add one.
The empty state now says what a bucket is and offers a button that lands on the
keychain with the editor already open — navigating to the screen and leaving
+ BUCKET to be found among five buttons would be most of the same problem. The
phone gets the sentence and no button: its keychain screen reads and deletes and
edits nothing, so there is no editor to send anybody to, and naming the machine
that has one beats an empty control that reads as a screen still loading.
The keychain screen's layout test grew the two categories it never covered.
Tags and buckets arrived after it was written, and the header strip it measures
is one that has overflowed twice before.
**A vault can now be deleted.** DELETE /api/v1/vaults/{id}, gated on Admin —
the line the rename already drew, for a stronger version of its reason, since
this takes the vault from everybody in it at once. The row is soft-deleted and
every grant to it withdrawn in one write; VaultAccessService filters on the stamp
at both ends, so from that moment the vault is absent from every member's /me and
every call naming it answers 404. Their clients notice on the pass described
above.
The team behind it is archived when it owned nothing else, which is the mirror of
renaming it: a vault made from the vaults screen gets a team named after it that
nobody was ever shown, and leaving that behind would leave a membership list no
screen has a row for. That is a second call rather than one transaction —
archiving is TeamService's, it refuses while a team owns vaults, and it can only
tell that this one no longer does once the deletion is committed. A crash between
the two leaves an empty team: invisible, archivable afterwards, harmless, and a
better failure than a vault that could not be deleted because tidying up after it
did not work.
Two refusals worth stating. The personal vault cannot be deleted at either end:
it is created by enrollment, everything filed nowhere else lives in it, and no
call would make another. And the items are kept — ciphertext behind a vault
nothing will resolve, so deleting them buys no confidentiality while destroying
what an operator undoing a mistake would need.
The client drops the key from the keyring and the row from the cache rather than
waiting for a refresh, so the list is right immediately; the items stay, as they
stay for a vault whose grant was withdrawn, because a copy is on every other
member's machine too and removing these rows would be the client pretending to a
reach it does not have. The confirmation says that out loud before it is
answered. It is the one sentence this screen must not leave implied: deletion is
no more retroactive than revocation is. See ADR 0001.
Desktop only, deliberately. The Android vaults screen offers no rename and no
hand-over either, so adding delete alone there would be the one destructive vault
operation on a screen with no other.
Three places asserted that a vault can never be deleted — TeamService's refusal
message, the TeamNotEmpty problem code, and ADR 0009 — and each now names the
route instead.
|
||
|
jaap-jan
|
a0568d4c35 |
Merge branch 'main' into the vaults screen, and let it rotate keys too
Main built vault key rotation while this branch was reshaping the screen that would drive it, so the two met in the same three files. Every other conflict was textual and resolved by taking both; these are the ones where a decision had to be made. **The view model.** Main taught TeamsViewModel three things and this branch had renamed and rewritten it into VaultsViewModel. All three are ported rather than dropped, because each is a behaviour rather than wording: adding somebody now wraps the vault to them on the spot instead of leaving SHARE KEY to be pressed, removing somebody rotates the vault and hands the new key to whoever is left, and a share reports how many generations were wrapped. The session calls they reach — ShareTeamVaultsAsync and RekeyTeamVaultsAsync — are scoped to a membership list rather than to one vault, and they are called that way here rather than narrowed: adding somebody is a change to the list, so every vault the list carries is one they can now fetch. This screen makes lists that carry one vault, so the sentences name one; where a list carries several, naming them all is the honest report, and the members section already says the list is shared. AddMemberAsync ran two lines over the length limit once the sharing was in it, so the calls behind it moved to AddOrInviteAsync and the three-way refusal to WhyNobodyCanBeAdded — the command reads as its guards now, which is what it was before the sharing arrived. **The tests.** Main's four new cases are ported to the vault-first API, including the one that matters most: the tampered key log is corrupted *before* the add, because the add is now a route to a wrap and a test that corrupted it afterwards would be asserting about the manual route only. SelectingAVault_ListsWhoHoldsAKey now expects two holders rather than one — main's fake records the creator's own self-grant, and a key-holder list that omitted it would show the one person who can certainly open a new vault as somebody who cannot. **The README.** The limits list is six rather than four or five: main's rotation entries and this branch's "a vault cannot be deleted" describe different things and both are true. "The rekey is flagged, never performed" is gone, since it is now performed, and M3 reads *Done* rather than *Done, except rekey*. One thing worth writing down that neither side had. An invitation claimed at sign-in still leaves the key owed, where an add does not: at the moment an invitation is issued there is no account and no published key to wrap to, and the claim happens on the invitee's machine, which holds nothing. Manual check 12.1 says so, because a reader who knows adding shares would otherwise read that step as stale. 1561 tests pass. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
8707629a6c |
Make the vault the thing you share, and ask a host which one it lives in
The teams screen listed teams that owned vaults, so sharing four servers with two
colleagues meant creating a team, then a vault inside it, then wrapping a key.
Two of those three steps are about a concept nobody arrives wanting. The screen
now lists vaults: naming one creates the membership list that carries it, named
after the vault and owned by you, and members, invitations, roles, hand-over and
key holders all hang off the vault they apply to.
Nothing on the server moved. VaultAccessService still resolves a shared vault
through team_membership and every membership call still names a team id — what
went is the requirement that anybody make one. The split the whole design rests
on is untouched and is still what the screen is built around: adding somebody
authorises the server to serve them, and only a machine holding the key can make
the vault readable. ADR 0009 keeps its decision and gains an addendum recording
which half of it a person is now asked about.
The one place the team resurfaces is a membership list carrying several vaults,
which this screen cannot produce and does not hide: the members section says so,
because "adding somebody here adds them there" is precisely the fact a
vault-shaped screen is in a position to conceal.
Two things left the interface and one arrived. Creating a team is gone, and so is
archiving one — it was only ever possible for a team owning no vaults, and a
screen whose rows are vaults has no row for one, so the button would have been
unreachable or always refused. The endpoint is unchanged and the screen states
the limit instead, since a vault cannot be deleted at all. The exception is a
create whose second call failed: cancelling that form archives the membership
list it left behind, which is a deliberate departure from this client's rule
against tidying up on the user's behalf, made because nothing else can reach it.
What arrived is PUT /api/v1/vaults/{id}. Without it the screen loses its only
editing action, since renaming the team behind a vault is invisible to everybody
who was never shown the team. It is gated on PermissionFlags.Admin — the line
UpdateTeamEndpoint already draws, because a name is what everybody in the vault
sees it called rather than part of its contents — and it renames the owning team
with it when that team carries nothing else, so the row an operator reads and the
name a user says cannot drift apart. The slug never moves, for the reason it does
not move on a team rename. The session edits its cached vault row rather than
replacing it with the response, which deliberately carries no wrapped key.
The host editor now asks which vault a host goes into, beside the name, while
adding and only where there is more than one vault to write to. It is a second
picker rather than the keychain screen's reused, and the two selections are
separate on purpose: that one is a standing preference about where new items go,
this is a field of the host in front of you, and binding both to one selection
would mean a click on the other screen could move a half-typed host. An existing
host is not offered it at all rather than offered it disabled — the two vaults
are encrypted under different keys, so moving an item is a delete and a retype.
That forced a fix worth naming. The group picker was built from the active
vault's groups whatever vault the host was being filed into, so a host put in a
shared vault could be filed under a group only its author can resolve — a
colleague would see it filed under nothing, which is the quietest kind of wrong.
Groups are now kept per vault and the picker follows the vault choice.
Two renames, because the pair they would otherwise have made is a bug farm:
ShellScreen.Vault became Keychain and VaultScreen became KeychainScreen, which is
what the rail has always labelled that screen, leaving Vault for one vault's
contents and Vaults for the vaults themselves. The enum values are unchanged;
NavRail.axaml writes them as x:Static literals.
1536 tests pass, seven more than before. Five are new on the server — the rename
endpoint's success, the team it does and does not take with it, the two refusals
and the empty name — and the client suite gains six and folds four together,
having lost the two about archiving a team.
|