Files
DodoSSH/tests/DodoSSH.Client.App.Layout.Tests
jaap-jan 36b8a23020 Give the update banner the view model it is typed to
The banner has never worked. It went into MainWindow's fourth row with no data
context of its own, so it inherited the shell's — and it is the one control in
that file typed to a screen's view model rather than to MainWindowViewModel,
because it is the only one with a layout suite that hosts it over UpdateViewModel
alone. Compiled bindings type-check against x:DataType at runtime, so every
binding inside it resolved against the wrong object and failed the way a compiled
binding does: quietly. No headline, and DismissBannerCommand and RestartNowCommand
both null.

A button with a null command is enabled, hovers, depresses and does nothing, which
is why this looked like a hit-testing problem and why the WebView was the first
suspect. It is not one. The strip is a sibling row for the reason the occlusion
rule gives and that arrangement is correct — the terminal's rectangle is never
covered, only shortened. What was actually on offer was an announcement that an
update had been downloaded, with two buttons that refused to install it and no
way to make it go away either. The preferences screen's RESTART NOW worked
throughout, because it binds Updates.RestartNowCommand from the shell's own
context, which is the contrast that pins the cause.

The context is set on the banner itself and IsVisible loses its Updates. prefix
with it, because a data context on an element resolves that element's other
bindings too — the rule the page area's wrappers upstairs exist to work around.
Those wrappers are needed because IsHostsScreen and its siblings belong to the
shell; IsBannerShowing belongs to the banner's own view model, so there is nothing
to wrap here.

Neither existing suite could have caught it. A layout test supplies the data
context it is measuring, which is exactly the assumption that was wrong, and the
shell suite has no visual tree — its project file already says it does not cover
whether the XAML binds to the right names. So the new test asserts the wiring
rather than the layout: a real shell over the ready-update fake, MainWindow
constructed and never shown, and the banner asked what context it got, whether it
is visible and whether RESTART NOW carries a command. Checked failing with the one
attribute removed. Constructing the window is safe where showing it is not, and
nothing here needs it shown: a data context propagates when it is set, not when
the tree is measured.
2026-08-06 12:35:06 +02:00
..