Public Access
jaap-jan
808a9a7fc1
+ NEW HOST decided two defaults separately and let them contradict each other. The group came from the screen — the selected card, or failing that the group whose contents are showing — and the vault came from the keychain screen's standing "new items go to" preference. Inside a group belonging to any other vault the two disagreed, and the group is what lost: GroupInEditingVault drops a group the editor's vault has not got, on the sound reasoning that a host filed under an id its readers cannot resolve looks unfiled to everybody but the person who wrote it. So pressing the button while standing inside a team's PLATFORM opened a form filed under nothing, bound for the personal vault, with no sentence anywhere saying either thing had happened. The vault now follows the group. A group lives in exactly one vault, so a host that is to land in that group has to be sealed in that vault too — which is the rule + NEW GROUP has followed for a parent since the cards became a tree, and the comment there claiming this as a deliberate difference from the host's editor is the one the code has now caught up with. The filter stays, because there is one case left for it: the group's vault may be one this session can read and not write, a team vault this account is a viewer of. TargetVaults is the readable-and-writable set and is what decides here, so a viewer keeps the standing preference and loses the group with it, rather than opening an editor aimed at a save that cannot happen. Both directions are tested, since one alone would not say which default wins: standing in a shared vault's group, the editor opens on that vault with the group selected and the host saves there; and with the preference pointed at the shared vault while a personal-vault group is open, the group beats the picker somebody set once.