`Tag` has been a full item kind for three commits — a table, a migration, a codec, a merge, a cipher — and `HostSecret.TagIds` has merged per tag so two people tagging one host both keep theirs. Nothing drew a chip. The tags a client could store were ones nothing here could see. Chips on host rows, both heads, from names resolved through the tag list rather than ids: a tag that does not resolve is left out rather than drawn, because it means the tag was deleted elsewhere or belongs to a vault this session cannot read, and a host with one chip fewer is the honest answer where a host wearing a GUID is not. The id stays on the host, so the chip comes back if the tag does. The picker is chips that toggle, matching the chips on the row behind it. A list of names to tick would make the user match an entry to a chip they can see two inches away. The box under it creates a tag and puts it on straight away, because that is when a tag is usually wanted — while tagging a host and finding it does not exist yet. Unlike every other field in that editor it writes to the keychain immediately, since a host can only name an id that exists; cancelling therefore leaves the tag behind, which is honest rather than hidden. A name that already exists is used rather than repeated: two tags called "staging" are storable and must stay storable, because two people creating one offline is how it happens, but typing it into a box beside a chip of the same name is a slip. Renaming and deleting needed a home, or the picker fills with names nobody uses and never empties. That home is a TAGS category on the keychain screen, where every other item kind is managed — and renaming is the whole reason a tag is an item rather than a string repeated inside twenty payloads: it is one write, and no host is touched. The delete confirmation counts the hosts wearing it, which is the difference between a tidy-up and losing a filter somebody relies on. The desktop host editor now scrolls, and that is not a tidy-up. A picker's height is a chip per tag in the keychain, wrapped, so somebody with fifteen tags has an editor half again as tall as somebody with three; no fixed height holds that, and trimming other fields to buy room only moves the failure to whoever has sixteen. The layout suite caught it the moment its seeder grew tags — which is why the seeder now creates ten rather than three, enough to drive the pane onto its cap so the capped shape is what gets measured rather than one no real keychain produces. The cost is named where it is paid: the harness skips anything inside a ScrollViewer, so from here it certifies that pane fits the column rather than that every field in it does. Two smaller things fell out. Five buttons overflowed the keychain header by a few pixels, so GENERATE lost the word KEY — its tooltip carries what the word did. And TotalItemCount had been counting keys and credentials while ALL showed four kinds; it counts all five now, because a number under a chip that disagrees with the rows it opens is worse than no number. An adversarial review of this change found two defects it had introduced, both green against the full suite. NewTag filed into the "new items go to" picker while the tag list only ever holds the active vault's — so with a team vault selected a tag would be created, queued for push, reported as added, and then invisible, with no row, no count, no picker entry and nothing able to rename or delete it, because there is no active-vault switcher to go and find it with. The comment on the host editor's own create path states that exact rule; this was the one place that broke it, and NewObjectStore, whose list is likewise active-vault-only, already ignored the picker. And the tag editor was the only one of five that did not disarm a pending deletion when it opened, so arming a key's deletion and then pressing + TAG left a live DELETE for an item the user was no longer looking at, directly above the boxes they were typing into. Both are fixed, both have a test, and the first was checked against the broken version before being kept. The same review caught a doc comment that had been inserted between SnippetRowViewModel's summary and its declaration, silently taking it over. Verified by the whole suite on a clean build: 1413 tests over nineteen projects, none failing. Both heads build. The rectangles the layout suite cannot reach are phase 9 of docs/manual-checks.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
25 KiB
Adding hosts on the phone
The phone can read a keychain and connect through it. It cannot put anything in one. This document is the plan for the change that fixes that, and it is written to be picked up cold — the decisions, the reasons, the ordered work, and the traps that are already known.
Status: built. All six steps. Each one compiled with the whole suite green before the next began, which is the rule the ordering below sets.
Step State Notes 1. HostGroupSecretgrowsDone Five fields, a version rule the codec did not have, a byte pin, and the "groups are flat" prose rewritten in all four places it appeared. 2. The Tagitem kindDone Secret, codec, merge, cipher, repository, both registries, EF entity and the generated AddTagItemmigration.3. HostSecretgrows,Portgoes nullableDone TagSet,TagIds,Portasint?,AsksForPassword, both schema versions, andHostInheritance— the resolver.4. The shared view model Done Every choke point below, plus the group editor the plan never assigned a step to and without which nothing could set a default at all. 5. The phone Done The +, the sheet, both editor cards, the back guard and EDIT on the connect bar.6. Tests and false prose Done Plus a fourth "groups are flat" site in README.mdthis plan did not list, and a cross-vault resolution bug the scouting for it turned up.Tags shipped after the six steps, in a seventh pass. They were storable and unreachable when step 6 closed — a full item kind that no screen drew. Both heads now show a chip per tag on a host row and toggle them in the host editor, which also creates one inline, because wanting a tag and tagging a host are the same moment. Renaming and deleting live in a TAGS category on the keychain screen: a tag is an item so that renaming it is one write instead of twenty, and that rename needed somewhere to happen.
That pass also made the desktop host editor scroll. A picker's height is a chip per tag in the keychain, so no fixed height holds it — which the layout suite caught the moment its seeder grew tags.
HostFields.Fromwas answered by a refusal rather than by threading the resolver into the sync engine. A relay host may not inherit its port;HostSecret.TryValidaterefuses one that tries. A plaintext column derived from a different item goes stale when that item is edited and nothing re-pushes the hosts beneath it, so the relay would keep dialling the old port — which is worse than the restriction.One decision was taken that this plan did not specify. "Three states where there were two" is four, not three: a host can bind a key, bind a credential, be pinned to a typed password, or take its group's answer, and two nullable ids express three of those. Naming neither id now means inherit, so
HostSecret.AsksForPasswordwas added to say "a typed password, even under a group that lends a key" out loud. Nothing stored changed meaning — no group could lend a binding before this build, so every existing host resolves exactly as it did.
What was asked for
A floating + at the bottom right of the phone's HOSTS screen, opening a menu at the bottom offering new
host or new group.
A host carries: which vault it is filed into (personal or a team's), an alias, a hostname or IP address, a group, tags, an SSH port, and a username with either a password or an SSH key.
A group carries: an alias, an optional parent group, and a default SSH port, username and password-or-key — defaults for the hosts inside it.
The shape of the problem
Three of those fields do not exist at any layer, and one of them is refused on the record.
| Asked for | What exists today |
|---|---|
The + and the editors behind it |
Nothing. Theme/Phone.axaml has no .fab class, and its comment says an unused style would be "a claim that the control exists somewhere". HostsScreen.axaml's own v2 note says hosts are created on the desktop and sync down. (This row named a ConnectionsScreen.axaml as a second site. No such file exists or ever has; and the HostsScreen statement is an XAML comment, so no phone screen ever rendered that sentence to a user.) |
| Vault picker | Built. VaultViewModel.TargetVaults / SelectedTargetVault / HasVaultChoice, hidden at one vault. The desktop's VaultScreen.axaml already draws it. |
| Alias, hostname, port, username, key-or-password, group | Built, in the shared VaultViewModel host editor — EditorLabel, EditorHostname, EditorPort, EditorUsername, EditorAuthenticationChoices, EditorGroupChoices, SaveHostCommand. The phone has never bound any of it. |
| Tags | Nothing. SyncEntityType.Tag = 5 and HostTag = 6 are reserved slots with nothing behind them. HostSecret has no tag field. |
| A group's parent | Refused on the record. HostGroupSecret's own remark says groups are flat because two clients can each re-parent A under B and B under A offline, a scalar merge accepts both, and the result is a cycle no reader can draw and the server cannot see, because it is inside the payload. |
| A group's defaults | Nothing. HostGroupSecret has exactly one field, Label. |
So the phone half is mostly wiring. The domain half is three new capabilities, and one of them overturns a written decision.
The three decisions
Tags are a real vault item, and a host names them. A tag is a shared, reusable thing — the point of it is
to put the same tag on twenty machines and filter by it later — so it needs an identity of its own, not a
string repeated inside twenty payloads. SyncEntityType.Tag = 5 becomes a live item kind. Membership is a
TagIds set on HostSecret, not the reserved HostTag = 6 join.
The reason to skip the join is that the merge does not need it. The argument for HostSecret.GroupId living on
the host is that filing two hosts into one group must be two writes to two items; the same holds here. What a
join would have bought beyond that is two machines tagging the same host without one of them losing — and
ThreeWayMerge.Map already gives that. It resolves a keyed collection key by key, honouring presence and
absence, which is set semantics with removals. HostOptions is merged through it today via ToNameMap(), and
a tag set keyed by tag id is the same shape. So HostTag = 6 stays reserved and unused, and the second run
through the item-kind checklist is not spent.
Group defaults are inherited, not copied. A host that leaves a field blank uses its group's value; a host that fills one in overrides it. The editor shows the group's value as the field's placeholder, so the form says what leaving it blank will get you. Copying the values into the host at create time was the alternative and it was rejected: it makes a group a one-shot template rather than a live default, and changing a group would then leave every host that had ever been created under it pinned to the old value.
Groups get a parent, and the resolver breaks cycles. HostGroupSecret gains ParentId. The editor refuses
a parent that is already a descendant, which stops a cycle being made here; the resolver walks with a visited
set and stops at a repeat, which contains a cycle that arrives from somewhere else. A cycle therefore degrades
to a group that reads as a root — flat headings, defaults unresolved past that point — instead of hanging the
connect path, and clearing the parent in the editor is the repair. This is the load-bearing part of the
decision: with inheritance the chain is walked at connect time, so an unguarded cycle is not an undrawable
sidebar, it is a shell that never opens.
HostGroupSecret's "No parent. Groups are flat." remark and HostGroupSecretTests' class remark both become
false prose and must be rewritten to say what replaced the argument, not deleted. Same for the four rows in
docs/design-import-gaps.md recording the phone's missing +.
What the payload becomes
HostSecret HostGroupSecret
Label Label
Hostname ParentId ← new, optional
Port int? — null inherits DefaultPort ← new
Username null inherits, "" none DefaultUsername ← new
Notes DefaultSshKeyId ← new
JumpHostIds DefaultCredentialId ← new
Options
SshKeyId null inherits TagSecret
CredentialId null inherits Label
AsksForPassword ← new, true only
GroupId null = ungrouped
TagIds ← new
RelayEnabled
Port becoming int? is the change with the widest blast radius, and it is unavoidable: int with a default
of 22 has no way to say "I have no port of my own". HostSecret.DefaultPort = 22 stays, as the last fallback
after the chain runs out.
Three states where there were two
SshKeyId and CredentialId both null currently means "ask for a password each time" — a decision, not an
absence. AuthenticationChoice's own remark argues at length that the two must never be conflated.
Inheritance adds a state, so the picker needs an explicit "Inherit from group" entry beside "Password
(ask each time)", and Bound(...) needs to distinguish them. Username has the same problem: null means
"no username" today and is refused at connect; it has to come to mean "inherit", with "no username" still
reachable and still refused.
Built as four states, not three, because two nullable ids only carry three. Key, credential, typed
password, inherit — and naming neither id was the third and is now the fourth. HostSecret.AsksForPassword
carries the difference: null is "not stated", which walks the chain and lands on a typed password if the
chain lends nothing, and true is "a typed password, even under a group that lends a key". Only true is
ever written, and a decoded false folds back to null, so a host that never touched the field encodes
exactly as it did before it existed. Username needed no field — an empty string is "no username" and null
is "inherit". Port needed none either: there is no "explicitly no port", only 22 at the end of the chain.
Mutual exclusion moves with it. HostSecret.TryValidate enforces "a key or a credential, never both" per
record; a host naming a credential under a group naming a key is two individually valid records that resolve to
two bindings. Exclusion has to be enforced at resolution, host-over-group, and the resolver must never
return both.
The order to build it in
Each step compiles and its tests pass before the next one starts. Steps 1–3 are the domain and are prerequisites for everything; step 4 is the only user-visible one.
1. HostGroupSecret grows
src/DodoSSH.Client.Domain/HostGroupSecret.cs, HostGroupSecretCodec.cs, HostGroupSecretMerge.cs.
- Add
ParentId,DefaultPort,DefaultUsername,DefaultSshKeyId,DefaultCredentialId. TryValidate: rejectGuid.Emptyfor each id, reject aParentIdequal to the group's own id where that is knowable, apply the same 1–65535 range rule toDefaultPort, and refuse a group naming both a default key and a default credential.- The codec needs the host codec's rule, which it does not have today.
HostGroupSecretCodecstampsCurrentSchemaVersionunconditionally. CopyHostSecretCodec.SchemaVersionFor— a maximum over the fields actually present, not a ladder — or upgrading one machine makes every group read-only on every other. A group carrying none of the new fields must still encode at version 1, byte for byte. HostGroupSecretMergegains the five fields, each a scalar.- Add a group byte pin mirroring
AddingTheKeyField_DidNotChangeTheBytesOfAHostWithoutOne. The group codec has none, and the same "old vaults must re-encode identically" argument applies to it.
2. The Tag item kind
SyncEntityType.Tag = 5, CryptoSpec.AadResourceType.Tag = 8, ChangeEntityType.Tag = 5 and the
PublicAPI.Unshipped.txt line already exist — no contract change, no crypto-spec change, no docs/crypto.md
change. LocalCacheProtector's AAD switch already maps Tag.
New: TagSecret.cs, TagSecretCodec.cs, TagSecretMerge.cs in DodoSSH.Client.Domain; TagCipher.cs,
TagRepository.cs in DodoSSH.Client.Sync. Edited: Client.Sync/ItemKinds.cs (registry entry + TagKind),
VaultSession.cs (a Tags repository beside HostGroups), Domain/Hosts.cs (VaultTag),
Infrastructure/DodoDbContext.cs, Infrastructure/Configurations/HostAndSyncConfigurations.cs,
Api/Features/Sync/ItemKinds.cs (registry entry + server TagKind).
A server migration is required — a tag is its own table. Generate it, do not hand-write it:
dotnet ef migrations add AddTagItem --project src/DodoSSH.Infrastructure, committing all three resulting file
changes. No client migration: ClientCacheContext has one item table keyed by (VaultId, EntityType, EntityId), so a new kind is new rows.
Four traps, all of which pass a naive test suite:
TagCiphermust sayAadResourceType.Tagas a constant, never cast fromSyncEntityType.Tag. Tag is 5 on the wire and 8 in the crypto enum. A cast seals tags underCredential, which encrypts and decrypts perfectly on the machine that wrote it and is a spec violation nothing notices until another implementation refuses the item — and the AAD is frozen into stored ciphertext.AadResourceTypeTestsis the test that catches this, and it only catches it oncePinnedPairsandSealSamplehave a Tag arm.- The
ItemKinds.Registryentry is whatSyncEnginepulls with.SyncedTypesis projected from it. Miss it and tags encrypt, merge and list perfectly on the machine that made them and are never once requested from the server. TagKind.Fieldsreturnsnull, not an emptySyncPlaintextFields. An empty record still serialisesrelayEnabled: false, which invites a reader to believe the type has a relay setting that is off.ValidateFieldsmust refuse everything, with reasons. There is no default; an unimplemented one accepts whatever arrives.RelatedIdmatters more here than it did for a group — it is the field a futureHostTagwould reach for, andSyncPlaintextFieldsis frozen so it cannot be removed. FollowSnippetKindandObjectStoreKind, which are more complete thanHostGroupKind.
3. HostSecret grows, and Port goes nullable
HostSecret.cs, HostSecretCodec.cs, HostSecretMerge.cs, plus a new TagSet value type and a new resolver.
TagSetis a structural-equality wrapper in the shape ofJumpChain— a plainIReadOnlyList<Guid>on a record gets reference equality from the compiler-generatedEquals, which would make every host read as changed on every sync pass and two identical edits register as a conflict. UnlikeJumpChainit is a set: order carries no meaning, so it sorts and dedupes, and it exposes aToIdMap()for the merge.HostSecretMergemergesTagIdsthroughThreeWayMerge.Map, per tag, so two people each adding a different tag to one host both keep theirs. It is not a scalar; a whole-value merge here would silently drop one side.Portbecomesint?.TryValidate'sis < 1 or > 65535is already false for null, which is the wanted behaviour but is silent — say so in a comment, and fix the message, which interpolates{Port}and renders empty for null.SchemaVersionForneeds branches for both new fields, and this is the one that loses data if forgotten. A host withPort = nullwritten at version 1 omits the property (WhenWritingNull); an older client deserialisesint Portas 0,TryValidaterefuses it, and the item reads as unreadable rather than read-only — gone, not locked. AddPortInheritSchemaVersion = 5andTagIdsSchemaVersion = 5(or 5 and 6) and make both bump the maximum.AddingTheKeyField_DidNotChangeTheBytesOfAHostWithoutOnepins the exact bytes of a minimal host, including"port":22. A host that now inherits its port drops that key. Keep the pinned literal for a host with an explicit port, and add a companion for the inheriting one — do not edit the old literal to match whatever the code produces.TagIdsmust serialise last inHostPayloadDocument, and empty must serialise as absent, or every host in every vault looks changed on the first sync after the upgrade.
New file: the resolver. Given a host and the group list, walk GroupId then ParentId with a visited set,
returning resolved port, username and binding, plus which group each came from — the editor needs the second
half for its placeholders. It must never return both a key and a credential.
4. The shared view model, and the two heads
VaultViewModel is where nearly all of it lands, and both heads get it at once because both bind the same
properties.
The choke points, from the connect-path trace:
TryBuildAuthentication(HostSecret, …)andTryBuildConnectionRequest(HostSecret, …)both take a bareHostSecret— this signature is where group context is currently lost. Both must take the resolved value. This is the single highest-leverage change: it is the only auth resolution in the product, and both heads and both transports go through it.- The credential-username fallback becomes three levels: credential → host → group chain.
Complete(...)must refuse on an empty username only after the chain has been consulted.HostRowViewModel.Address,Dialled,TransfersViewModel's connected-to label andTerminalWorkspace.Describemust show the dialled address.MainWindowViewModel.RanksearchesAddress, so an unresolved one makes hosts unfindable by their real port.HostFields.FrominHostCiphermust emit the resolved port. This is the one place where an unresolved read is a wrong wire rather than a wrong label: it fills the relay's plaintext columns, which is what the server dials. A relay host with a null port also fails server validation outright.- Host-key pinning keys on host and port.
ForgetHostKeyAsyncand the "pin in use" endpoint set readrow.Host.Portdirectly — a host inheriting 2222 pins under 2222 while both look under 22. HostRowViewModel.Authentication,SelectedHostAsksForAPassword(in bothVaultViewModelandTransfersViewModel) andSelectedHostAuthenticationNoteall switch on the host's own two ids and must switch on the resolved binding, with new wording for a binding that came from a group.HostsBoundTocounts hosts naming a key explicitly. A key deleted while only a group names it warns nobody and then refuses every host under that group at connect time. It must walk groups too.- The editor: load must distinguish "unset" from "explicitly this",
BuildHostmust preserve that in both directions, and each field needs the resolved value as its placeholder. ImportViewModel.IsAlreadyPresentcompares port and username directly, so a stored host inheriting 22 will never match an imported host at 22 and the import screen re-offers duplicates. Decide whether an imported block with noPortshould inherit rather than pin 22 —SshConfigResolverreturnsDefaultPorttoday.
5. The phone
Views/HostsScreen.axaml and Theme/Phone.axaml. No csproj edit — Avalonia globs **/*.axaml. Compiled
bindings are on, so a binding to a property that does not exist is a build error; TreatWarningsAsErrors is on
repo-wide, so any XAML warning fails CI.
- A
Button.fabstyle, and the comment that currently refuses one rewritten to say what it now opens. - The
+needs aPanelwrapping the screen's rootGridso it can sit bottom-right without moving. Placing it inside the list row would put it above the connect bar, which appears and disappears with the selection. - The bottom sheet follows
HostKeySheet.axaml, the head's one existing sheet: a scrim (Border Background="#9E0E1220", a literal because the palette holds no alpha surface), a bottom-alignedBorderwithCornerRadius="22,22,0,0", a decorative grab handle, and no tap-to-dismiss unless it is wired by hand, because nothing on this head implements it. - Scrim reach is a real choice. Declared inside
HostsScreen, a scrim darkens the screen area only and the 64px nav bar stays lit and tappable. To cover the display the sheet has to sit inPhoneShell.axamlbesideHostKeySheet, which is exactly why that control lives there. - The back gesture needs a new guard, above the
switchinPhoneShell.axaml.cs, in the shape of the host-key guard: back should close the sheet or the editor rather than leave the screen. The comment on that method states an invariant about the switch cases staying in step with the surface tests — so add a guard, do not extend the switch. (This namedIsVaultsSurfaceandIsConnectionsSurface. Neither exists anywhere in the repo; the real properties areIsMoreSurfaceandIsTerminalSurface, and only the first is what the switch mirrors.) - The editors follow
SnippetsScreen.axaml: aBorder Classes="card"in the same grid row as the list, toggled onIsEditing, with the list toggled on!IsEditing. There is no dialog, no modal and no editor-screen anywhere on this head, and the reason is written down — a form stacked over the list hides what it is about. - Editing an existing host comes nearly free: the shared
IsEditingpanel serves both, so the connect bar gets an EDIT button beside CONNECT. Not asked for, but a+that adds hosts with no way to correct one is a strange thing to ship.
6. Tests
House style: Subject_Predicate, articles included, the predicate smuggling in the reason
(_RefusesRatherThanFallingBackToThePassword). No Async suffix on test methods; always on private helpers.
Every class carries a remark naming the class of failure it exists to catch. xunit.v3 + Shouldly, with the
because-string used as prose.
- Three shared builders need the new fields:
Domain.Tests/HostFactory.cs,Sync.Tests/SyncHarness.cs,Sync.Tests/HostCipherTests.cs. There is no shared group factory and with five new fields there should be. - Three guard tests fail by design and that is what they are for:
HostSecretMergeTests.EveryScalarField_IsRoutedThroughAMerge(noteGroupIdis missing from itswithblock today — an existing gap worth closing while there),ValueSemanticsTests.TryValidate_RejectsWhatCannotBeStored, and the two "groups are flat" remarks. ItemKindsTests.ThePullFilterNamesEveryTypeThisBuildSynchronisesis an ordered list — add Tag in registry order.AadResourceTypeTestsneedsPinnedPairs, aSealSamplearm and aNewTag()builder.SyncEndpointTests.AHostGroupCarryingAParent_IsRejectedasserts the server refuses a plaintextParentIdwith a reason containing "flat". Putting the parent inside the payload does not break it mechanically, but its stated reason becomes wrong. It should survive with a rewritten comment — the parent lives in the payload, the plaintext column stays refused, and ADR 0004 is why. Decide that deliberately rather than letting it drift.Push_AnUnsupportedEntityType_IsInvalidNotAFailedBatchpicks the first type with no kind registered, very likely Tag today. It self-heals toHostTagviaAssert.SkipWhen.App.Layout.Testsmeasures pixels and bends rather than breaks. Extend the seeders — nesting and a tag row change what the widest realistic content is — rather than the assertions.ScreenLayoutTests.cs:1310pinsChangedFields = "Hostname, Port, Username, Options, Group"as a literal; addTagsto keep it measuring the worst case.ShellFlowTests.ReadyToConnectAsyncgives its host both a username and a port, so the inheritance tests need a host with neither, or the group is never the source.
Found on the way, and out of scope
LocalCacheProtector's AAD switch is missing ConnectionLogEntry, ActivityLogEntry and ObjectStore, so
ConflictStore.Record throws ArgumentOutOfRangeException on a conflict for any of those three. Pre-existing,
unrelated to any of this, and Tag is already in that switch. Worth a separate fix.
Prose that becomes false
Not a tidy-up — these are the places the codebase currently tells a user or a maintainer that this feature is deliberately absent, and each states a reason that will no longer hold.
Theme/Phone.axaml— the "No floating action button" block.Views/HostsScreen.axaml— the v2 and v3 notes on the missing+.— this file does not exist and never did. The real inventory is the two above plusViews/ConnectionsScreen.axamlREADME.md,docs/android-port.mdanddocs/design-import-gaps.md. Neither phone site was "rendered on screen": both are XAML comments.HostGroupSecret.csandHostGroupSecretTests.cs— "No parent. Groups are flat."docs/design-import-gaps.md— the Add host row, the two floating-button rows, the "Tag / HostTag still reserved and unused" paragraph, and the tag-chips and groups-on-a-team's-hosts rows in the Hosts table.