Public Access
a4b81da59715db0e906f0ce9b0f641dc576b318a
8
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  laurensandClaude Opus 5
|
56c19b006d |
Stop the updater offering the build it saw first, whatever has been published since
A client two versions behind was offered the older of the two, installed it,
restarted, and was told at once that another update was waiting. Two downloads,
two installs and two restarts to move one step.
The feed was not the problem and could not have been. The nightly release is
deleted and remade on every push to main, so it holds exactly one build: a client
can only ever be offered the newest thing there is. The wrong version came from
this application's own state.
◆ THE PASS STOPPED ASKING, WHICH IS NOT WHAT IT WAS MEANT TO STOP DOING.
if (!IsAutomatic || State is UpdateState.Downloading or UpdateState.Ready)
Ready means something is downloaded and waiting. The intent behind excluding it is
right — there is no point fetching what has already been fetched — and what it
actually did was skip the check. So from the first thing any process downloaded,
its banner was pinned to that build for the rest of its life, however many newer
ones were published afterwards. On a rolling channel that is the normal case
rather than a corner.
Not re-fetching is still the rule and now lives in FetchAsync, which compares
versions rather than refusing to look: the same build is left alone, a newer one
replaces what was pending. Which is also why FetchAsync answers with what is
*pending* rather than with what the check returned — a client on 1.0 holding 1.1
is told 1.1 by every later check, because 1.1 is still the newest thing on the
feed, so "the check found something" and "there is something new" are different
questions and only the second one is worth a download.
A build already fetched is never discarded, including when a check answers null.
Null means the feed's newest is no newer than the build that is *running*, which
says nothing about the one on disk — that one is still newer, and withdrawing an
offer somebody has already been shown would be the worse answer.
◆ AND A LAST LOOK BEFORE THE PROCESS IS REPLACED, WHICH IS THE HALF THE TIMER
CANNOT REACH.
The loop asks every six hours. The build that caused this was published minutes
before RESTART NOW was pressed, so no interval anybody would accept would have
caught it. The press now asks once more.
It costs one small request in the ordinary case, because the feed answers with the
build already on disk and nothing is fetched. It costs a download only when there
genuinely is something newer, which is the case where the alternative was two
downloads anyway.
Bounded at ten seconds, and the wait rather than the request: VelopackUpdateChannel
records that Velopack's check takes no token, so cancelling would be observed only
after the call had already returned. Ten seconds bounds a small JSON document
against a network that drops packets rather than refusing them; a refused
connection fails in milliseconds and never reaches it.
Nothing here refuses a restart. An unreachable forge, a look that ran out of time,
a fetch of the newer build that failed halfway — all leave the build on disk
untouched and still newer than the one running, so the restart goes ahead with it.
Hence swallowed rather than reported: Failed is for something a person is waiting
on an answer to, and this person is waiting on a restart they are about to get.
IsRestarting keeps the banner up through it. Everything the strip draws keys off
IsReady and the look moves the state off that, so without it pressing RESTART NOW
made the banner vanish with nothing on screen saying why, for as long as a 120 MB
package takes. It says what it is doing instead, percentage and all.
◆ THE CHANNEL HAD TO LEARN WHICH BUILD IT FETCHED, AS AGAINST WHICH IT LAST FOUND.
Required by both halves above rather than tidied along with them. Matched()
resolved an AvailableUpdate only against `found`, which a check overwrites — and
both changes make this application check while a build is already downloaded. A
check that lands a newer answer and then fails to fetch it, or is given up on
halfway, leaves the shell restarting with the build it already has and Matched()
throwing at it: the offer real, the package on disk real, and the only thing wrong
being that the channel had forgotten which one it was. A slow forge became a
refused restart.
So `fetched` is recorded after a download returns, tried before `found`, and
survives every later check.
Settings → General claimed checks start "a couple of minutes after launch", which
has been untrue since the first pass moved to launch. It now also says the loop
keeps asking while an update is waiting, because that is the behaviour somebody
reading that row would want to know about.
UpdateFlowTests goes from 21 to 28: the pass asks again and fetches once, the
pending build is replaced when the feed moves on, a superseded offer reappears
through a dismissal, the press installs what the last look finds, and the three
ways the last look can fail all still install what was already on disk. Check
16.7a is the manual half, needing two real releases.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
 jaap-jan
|
4552538533 |
Let the Linux head check for updates, and seal its device key in the TPM
Two things the RPM shipped without, and the reason they arrive together is
that both are the same question — what may this platform ask of the machine,
and what must it not ask of the user.
◆ UPDATES: THIS CLIENT CHECKS AND FETCHES, AND PACKAGEKIT INSTALLS.
ADR 0013 rule 11 said there was no updater at all, and that went too far. It
conflated noticing that a newer build exists with installing it: the second is
what the trust argument is about, and the first is not — a client that checks
a fixed address and tells you what it found has taken no capability from
anybody. Written as a flat refusal, the rule bought its safety by paying a cost
that was avoidable, and the ADR now says so in its own words.
So LinuxUpdateChannel reads the rolling nightly release, compares versions the
way rpm compares them, downloads the package, verifies its digest and hands the
file to PackageKit over gdbus. Polkit asks; the user may say no; nothing is
torn down before the answer, because ApplyingEndsTheProcess is false and the
shell already knows what that means — it is the phone's shape, and declining an
update must not cost somebody their open shells.
Three details that are load-bearing rather than incidental:
- The comparison is rpmvercmp and not SemVer, because rpm is what will accept
or refuse the install. Same argument ADR 0014 makes for versionCode. The
installed side is read out of the rpm database rather than derived from the
assembly, so the SemVer-to-rpm translation exists in exactly one place. All
28 expected values in RpmVersionTests came out of rpm itself rather than out
of a reading of the algorithm.
- The digest is checked and is not a signature. Velopack verifies its own
downloads and Android checks a signature; an RPM over HTTPS has neither. The
manifest names a SHA-256 and a mismatch deletes the file rather than leaving
something installable-by-hand in the profile directory.
- ONLY_TRUSTED is cleared, which is what routes the request to polkit's
package-install-untrusted action. The package is unsigned, so requiring
trust would fail every update at the last step.
◆ THE DEVICE KEY: SEALED IN THE TPM, BEHIND A PIN THE TPM CHECKS.
ADR 0007's amendment is the bar: a gate inside the process is not a gate. The
key is sealed into a TPM 2.0 keyedhash object whose userAuth comes from a PIN,
so unsealing is a command the chip refuses; the blob is encrypted to the storage
hierarchy and is useless on any other machine; nothing here ever compares a PIN.
The sealed object deliberately carries no NoDA attribute, and that one omission
is the whole reason four digits is enough: every wrong answer advances the TPM's
dictionary-attack counter and the chip stops answering entirely once it trips.
Measured at four wrong tries against a software TPM, after which the correct PIN
gets nothing either. It is asserted by a test rather than left to a reading of
the template, because removing the attribute leaves every other assertion
passing.
This is weaker than Hello and Touch ID and the difference is invisible, so it is
written down in three places rather than smoothed over: those raise their prompt
from inside the platform and this one is a window we draw. The prompt is
deliberately plain for that reason — teaching people that a convincing DodoSSH
PIN box is a system dialog is the one thing this design must not do.
Rejected, each for failing the amendment: the Secret Service API, which has no
per-use consent and is DPAPI's shape exactly; fprintd, which answers a question
and holds nothing, so skipping the call skips the gate; and a polkit-gated root
helper, which would work and puts a privileged component in a package that
installs nothing setuid.
Availability is narrower than "has a TPM": on Fedora /dev/tpmrm0 is root:tss and
desktop users are not in tss, so the ordinary case reports unavailable and keeps
asking for the passphrase. Shipping a udev rule to widen that is refused — it is
the administrator's decision, not an application package's.
◆ WHAT IS ACTUALLY VERIFIED, SINCE THAT IS THE PART THAT USUALLY ISN'T.
This is the only device key store in the repository with real coverage, and it
is only possible because the PIN is a delegate and the TPM is a device: seal,
unseal, wrong PIN, lockout, decline and a foreign blob all run unattended
against a software TPM. Windows and macOS cannot be tested at all — their
prompts block a suite forever, which WindowsDeviceKeyStoreTests records.
TSS.Net's own TcpTpmDevice cannot reach swtpm: it opens the platform socket too
and exchanges a handshake only the Microsoft reference simulator answers, so
Connect() blocks with no error and no timeout. SoftwareTpm speaks the data
channel and nothing else.
The suite also lied once and was fixed: the lockout test trips shared state, and
without a DictionaryAttackLockReset in Dispose every later test got null from a
correct PIN — six of them assert null and passed for entirely the wrong reason.
End to end on a real Fedora 44: a genuine linux-x64 publish packages, installs,
and every DT_NEEDED in the installed tree resolves except liblttng-ust, which is
the one this spec deliberately excludes. What no runner covers is /dev/tpmrm0,
PackageKit and polkit, and Phase 19 grew five checks for exactly those.
Also fixed: the magic-bytes literal picked up raw control characters, which made
LinuxDeviceKeyStore.cs binary to git — no diffs and no line-ending normalisation.
|
||
|
jaap-jan
|
890a5f2246 |
Give the desktop a macOS head, signed from the first release
The same application, the same Velopack and the same two-phase person-run release as Windows, with four things forced to differ. Signing is a precondition rather than an improvement: Gatekeeper refuses an un-notarized download outright instead of warning about it, so there was never the "unsigned for now" that ADR 0013 decision 8 argues for on Windows, and release-macos.sh refuses to start without the identities. The packaging split is narrower than it first looked, and the old claim at the foot of ci.yml is why it was worth checking rather than assuming. vpk cross-compiles when told to: 'vpk [osx] bundle' builds a real .app on any platform, and CI now publishes osx-arm64 and bundles it on every main and tag build, which is what catches a restore graph with no macOS native asset. There is no '[osx] pack' off a Mac, and that part is correct — pack drives codesign, notarytool and stapler, which exist nowhere else. The dylib signing loop in the script looks redundant beside vpk's own pass and is not. vpk signs with 'codesign --deep', which is the shape Apple documents as wrong for nested code, and platform-flags has recorded a notarization rejection that names no file since before any of this existed. Signing each native binary inside-out first leaves that pass nothing to get wrong. MacDeviceKeyStore reaches ADR 0007's conclusion through different hardware: a P-256 key in the Secure Enclave under an access control requiring user presence, so the platform enforces the gate rather than this process — which is the whole point of that ADR's amendment. The enclave holds no other kind of key, hence ECIES where Windows uses RSA-OAEP, and the shape that falls out is better than the Windows one: sealing needs only the public half and is silent, so only unlock prompts. IsSupported probes rather than infers, because three ordinary Macs answer no — an Intel machine without a T2, one with no login password, and every unsigned development build, since enclave keys need a signing identity. Two decisions worth stating because they are reversible. arm64 only: a second channel is small work and nobody here has an Intel Mac to walk Phase 18 on, and an x64 package would be the only artefact in this repository reaching users unverified. And the pack id stays DodoSSH.Desktop even though vpk names the bundle after it, so /Applications holds DodoSSH.Desktop.app: decision 2's reasoning binds harder here, because a pack id of DodoSSH would put Velopack's install root on top of ClientPaths.DataDirectory and let an uninstall take the user's un-synced outbox with it. CFBundleDisplayName puts the product name back in front of a person. Measured rather than assumed, since none of it is obvious: the publish and the bundle were both run, LSMinimumSystemVersion is 12.0 because that is the minos in the apphost's own LC_BUILD_VERSION, and vpk copies a custom Info.plist verbatim with no substitution at all — which is why the plist is a template the script renders and not a committed file. What is not done is the half that needs the hardware. There is no macOS runner, so nothing past "it bundles" has ever run. Phase 18 is the whole of the verification, and the two checks most likely to fail are the terminal against WKWebView and the enclave interop, neither of which has executed once. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
af0e29a98b |
Give the desktop a nightly channel, the way the phone has one
ADR 0014 gave the phone a nightly and ADR 0013 rule 3 gave the desktop none, so the two heads had different answers to the same question — how does somebody try what is on main? — for no reason except the order the work happened in. This is the desktop's answer: CI publishes a build from main on every push, and it installs beside the release one rather than over it. The phone gets its separation from the platform. Android refuses an update signed by a different key, so its two channels cannot replace one another whatever anybody does. Nothing refuses anything here: Velopack applies what its feed serves and verifies no signature. So all of it is construction, and there are four separations because each closes a different door. A pack id each, so the two install in different directories and neither feed's package can be applied to the other's install. A Velopack channel each — win and win-nightly — so neither build ever reads the other's release index; the name reaches the wire as releases.win-nightly.json, which is why the constant in VelopackUpdateChannel and the argument in ci.yml have to agree or the channel answers nothing forever with no error. A prerelease flag, so the release channel cannot see the nightly even by accident. And a profile directory each, which is the one that is easy to skip and would hurt most: the cache schema is migrated on every launch, before unlock, so a shared profile means a nightly quietly upgrading a database the release build then opens. Both are installed at once by design, so that is an ordinary Tuesday rather than a corner case. The prerelease flag turns out to be load-bearing across heads as well. The phone's release channel reads releases/latest, which skips prereleases — so a desktop nightly published as a stable release would become the newest release in this repository and every phone on the release channel would start failing its check against a release carrying no Android manifest. Which build this is arrives as assembly metadata, the same mechanism and the same reasoning as the Android head: the updater needs the string rather than a branch, and a value baked into the assembly is one a crash report can be asked for. Three things read it — the feed, the prerelease flag, and the profile — and one more shows it: the titlebar says DodoSSH Nightly. Everything else that distinguishes the two is somewhere nobody is looking while typing a passphrase into one of them. The version needed a floor and it is applied to the whole build rather than to the packaging. MinVer answers 0.0.0-alpha.0.N until the first v* tag and vpk refuses anything below 0.0.1, so the job lifts the patch digit and keeps the height — through MinVerVersionOverride, so the assemblies carry the same number the installer does. Packing a version the assembly disagreed with would put one string on the preferences screen and another in the feed, which is the screen somebody reads when asked which nightly they are on. Two things found by running it rather than reading it. -t:MinVer needs a restore first, because the target arrives with the package and MSB4057 on a clean checkout reads like a typo in the workflow rather than a missing restore; the release script had the same gap and now restores before it reads. And vpk rejects an empty --packVersion loudly, which is how a broken version handoff announces itself rather than shipping a package called 1.0.0. Rule 3 is untouched. The release channel still has no job, no token and no runner, and the two channels cannot see each other. What a nightly costs is written where somebody reads it before installing one: whoever can write a release here can put a build on every nightly machine, which is fine for a build being tried and is not fine for a build holding somebody's infrastructure credentials. Verified by running the job's own steps against a clone in a Linux container: DodoSSH.Desktop.Nightly-win-nightly-Setup.exe, and an index naming pack id DodoSSH.Desktop.Nightly at 0.0.1-alpha.0.144. The upload itself is the one step not exercised — it needs a real forge and a write token, and check 16.10 is what walks the half no runner can. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
253c72d2b7 |
Name the organisation the repository actually lives in
It moved to DodoTech-Public, and every address in the product still said DodoTech. That looked like it worked, which is the part worth writing down: Gitea leaves a 301 at the old path and HttpClient follows a redirect on a GET, so both update channels would have kept polling through it. What a 301 does not survive is a POST. `vpk upload gitea` publishes the desktop release by POSTing to that URL, so the stale address would have failed at the one step the whole feature depends on — and a redirect is a thing an operator can delete, which turns "works today" into the same silent outage this session has already spent two commits on. So both channel constants, both release scripts, the workflow's REPO, the image's source label and the curl in phase 16 all name the live path. The local remote too, which had been printing a redirect warning on every push. Measured after the move: the org, the repo and the nightly release all answer 200 anonymously, and that release now carries both assets — the manifest and a 54 MB APK. The upload going through also answers the open question about the reverse proxy's body-size limit, which nothing local could test. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
b4a6c19ac1 |
Let the phone replace itself, and give CI a channel it may sign
The Android head had no updater and no release path, and the two are one problem: Android refuses an update signed by a different key, and CI generates a fresh debug key in every container. An APK released from a workflow could be installed once and never updated again — each new one an uninstall, which on this product means losing the cache, the outbox and the device key. So there are two channels, and they are two applications because the platform gives no third option. dev.dodotech.dodossh is cut from a v* tag by a person running scripts/release-android.ps1 with the key ADR 0011 rule 1 keeps off runners. dev.dodotech.dodossh.nightly is cut from main by CI and signed with a keystore committed here in the open — a key everybody has cannot be stolen and grants nothing by being held, which is why putting it in CI does not touch the rule. Neither can update the other, by construction. See ADR 0014. The android job assumed an image with a JDK and an Android SDK on it, which is what a GitHub runner is and what this project's is not. It now installs a JDK, fetches Google's command-line tools, accepts the licences and installs API 36 — each a no-op where it is already satisfied, and each cached by the persistent runner's own disk rather than by an action that would move a quarter of a gigabyte to rebuild a directory that never left. The client reads a small JSON manifest beside the APK, the counterpart of releases.win.json, and compares Android's versionCode rather than a version name: that integer is what the platform itself uses to accept or refuse an install, so comparing anything else would offer updates the phone then rejects. It fetches, and then asks Android to ask — the system draws its own confirmation, and from API 26 will not draw even that until unknown sources is on for this application. IUpdateChannel gained ApplyingEndsTheProcess. On Windows applying replaces the files and restarts, so the shell disposes the vault first and that is what zeroes the keys. On the phone the install is a request and the answer may be no, so disposing first would answer "not now" with a locked keychain and every shell closed — a punishment for declining an update. Two measured bugs found on the way, both older than this work and both invisible to a -getProperty check. ApplicationDisplayVersion is read by the Android targets in a top-level PropertyGroup, so the target setting it from MinVer ran after the only thing that reads it: every APK ever built here said versionName 1.0.0. And nothing found so far varies the launcher name per channel — four mechanisms tried, all of them recorded in platform-flags, none of them reaching the label the launcher shows. The two channels share an icon name for now and are told apart by package name, version, and what the preferences screen says. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
3ead865f01 |
Merge branch 'main' into the desktop updater, and give way on two numbers
Main landed a realtime push feature while this branch was building the updater, and the two collided in three places. Every one of them resolves the same way: main got there first, so this branch moves. **Two ADRs were both numbered 0012.** Main's is realtime push; this one is now [ADR 0013](docs/adr/0013-desktop-distribution-and-updates.md). Git did not call this a conflict — the filenames differ — so it would have merged quietly and left the directory with two 0012s and every cross-reference ambiguous. Renumbered here along with the nine places that point at it. **Two manual-check phases were both numbered 15**, and that one git did catch. Main's "Changes that arrive without a timer" keeps 15; installing and updating the desktop client becomes Phase 16, with its checks and every reference to them renumbered. The file's own rule is that a number is for life, which is exactly why the one that had not been pushed is the one that gives way. **The merge rewrote several files with CRLF**, and `.editorconfig` asks for LF on everything except `*.ps1`. That is not cosmetic here: IDE0055 is an error and `EnforceCodeStyleInBuild` is on, so it failed the build on three lines of App.axaml.cs whose only change in this branch was an ADR number in a comment. Forty-six files normalised back to LF; the release script keeps CRLF, which is what `.gitattributes` and `.editorconfig` both already say for a PowerShell file. Nothing else conflicted. The updater does not touch the sync loop or the event stream, and the one file both sides edited heavily — MainWindowViewModel — merged without a hunk in common. Verified after merging: the solution restores locked and builds clean, and 304 shell, 100 layout, 54 session, 28 client-api and 25 contracts tests pass. The first two counts are higher than before the merge because main's own tests came with it and pass alongside these. |
||
|
jaap-jan
|
6728a0a597 |
Let the desktop client replace itself, and give the repository one version
Packaging for Windows, and the updater that only exists once something is
packaged. Velopack, win-x64, fed from the project's own forge — never from the
deployment a client signs in to, which is ADR 0011 rule 2 carried over
unchanged and is why the feed address is a constant in the code rather than a
setting. See docs/adr/0012-desktop-distribution-and-updates.md.
**Nothing is ever installed while somebody is using it.** A newer build is found
on a six-hourly pass, downloaded in the background, and then waits — for a
restart the user presses, or for the next launch they were going to do anyway.
That is a policy rather than caution: this application argues at length that
locking keeps shells running, because a lock that destroyed work would stop
being used, and a restart does not keep them. Having taught that, it owes the
user the choice at the one moment it stops being true, and the sentence saying
so counts the shells it would close.
**The version is now derived from the v* tag**, by MinVer, for everything. There
was no version before this — no property anywhere, so every assembly reported
the SDK's 1.0.0 and the API served that string as its serverVersion to every
client that asked. The tag was already the version of record for the container
image; this makes it the version of record full stop. MinVer's failure mode is
answering plausibly rather than failing, and here a wrong version is a client
that never updates, so it is guarded twice: fetch-depth 0 on every checkout, and
a step that fails a tag build when the tag and the computed version disagree.
**The pack id is DodoSSH.Desktop and not DodoSSH**, which is the one decision
here that would have destroyed data. Velopack installs to %LOCALAPPDATA%\<packId>
and removes that whole directory on uninstall, and %LOCALAPPDATA%\DodoSSH is
where ClientPaths keeps the encrypted cache, the outbox of changes not yet
pushed, and the device key. The obvious id would have had the uninstaller
silently delete work the server has never seen — the thing the application
refuses to do without a counted confirmation. Velopack's own advice to move user
data to roaming %APPDATA% is declined for the reason ClientPaths already gives.
**Releases are cut by a person, and CI gains no job that could.** The tempting
argument is that a forge write token is not a signing key. It does not survive
contact with what the token does: Velopack clients trust their feed and do not
verify a package signature when they apply one, so whoever can write a release
can ship an update every install runs. That is the capability ADR 0011 rule 1
puts on a machine which is not a runner, reached through a different door. The
mechanical objection — vpk needs Windows and the runners are Linux — is the
smaller of the two and is recorded beside it, because somebody will fix one and
believe they are done.
Unsigned for now, deliberately and with the cost stated where a user reads it:
SmartScreen warns once per person, on Setup.exe, because Mark-of-the-Web is
applied by the browser that downloaded it. In-app updates are fetched by the
application and applied from a local file, and never trip it.
The banner is a fourth row of the window rather than an overlay. Anything drawn
in the terminal's rectangle is sliced by the native child window that composites
above it — the defect this window has shipped once — and a sibling row is the
arrangement TitleBar and StatusBar already prove works.
----
Three defects surfaced on the way, none of them in the feature being built.
**A settings key absent from the file came back as the CLR default, not the
declared one.** The JSON source generator builds a record through a synthesised
parameterised constructor and assigns every property from its argument array, so
a property initializer runs and is then overwritten by a default for anything the
file did not contain. A settings.json of {} read back a font size of 0, clamped
up to the 8px floor rather than the 13px the renderer draws at. It could not bite
while there was one setting, because that setting was written on every save and
so was never absent; adding a second would have turned automatic update checks
off for every existing profile, silently, the opposite of the documented default.
Reflection-based deserialisation of the same JSON answers correctly, which is why
every way of checking it by hand agrees except the one that ships. The defaults
now live on the constructor parameters, which is the only place the generator
reads them from.
**Declaring a RuntimeIdentifier on the desktop head broke the server's image
build.** It is the obvious way to let a self-contained publish restore under
locked mode, and it writes a net10.0/win-x64 target into the lock file of every
project the head references transitively — including DodoSSH.Contracts and
DodoSSH.Crypto, which the API builds too. The Dockerfile restores those with no
RID and fails NU1004. Found by running docker build rather than by reading. The
RID stays out of the committed state; the two commands that need one ask for it
unlocked, and the release script puts the lock files back.
**A Docker ARG named VERSION silently sets MSBuild's Version.** An ARG is an
environment variable for the rest of the stage, MSBuild reads environment
variables as properties, and property names are case-insensitive. With the
workflow passing main-<short sha> on a main build the publish died with
NETSDK1018 pointing at DodoSSH.Contracts, a project nobody had touched. The build
stage's argument is ASSEMBLY_VERSION now, empty except on a tag build.
All three are in docs/platform-flags.md, which is where the next person will look.
----
Verified: the whole solution builds and restores locked; 289 shell, 93 layout and
54 session tests pass, including the regression test for the settings defect and
a measurement of the banner at the window's minimum width. vpk pack runs end to
end and reports "Verified VelopackApp.Run()" against Program.Main. The API image
builds correctly both as a main build and as a tag build, carrying 1.0.0 and
0.1.0 respectively.
Not verified, and it needs a published release to be: installing, updating and
uninstalling on a real machine. That is Phase 15 of docs/manual-checks.md, and
the pack id and the WebView2 profile fix are reasoned and commented but only
proved by walking it. Two things to watch at the first upload — the reverse
proxy's body-size limit for a 64 MB asset, and whether vpk upload gitea is happy
with Gitea 1.27.1.
|