Files
DodoSSH/tests/DodoSSH.Api.Tests/EndpointInventoryTests.cs
T
jaap-jan e9cea2ccbc Let a shared vault arrive, a bucket be found, and a vault be deleted
Three things a user reported, one of which was a real bug and one of which was
not the bug it looked like.

**A vault shared with somebody never reached their machine.** The grant was
correct at both ends: the sharing client verified the recipient's key against the
key log and wrapped every generation to it, the server stored it, and /me would
have returned it. Nothing asked. VaultSession.RefreshVaultsAsync — the method
whose own summary says it is "called after a share and on a periodic pass" — had
no caller anywhere in the application, so the vault list was whatever the last
browser sign-in cached. A restart did not help: an offline unlock reads that same
cache. The vault appeared only if the recipient happened to sign in through the
browser again, which is why this looked like sharing being broken rather than
like a list that was never re-read.

So every synchronisation pass now re-reads it, before it syncs. SyncOnceAsync
takes the whole server rather than its sync half for that reason, and the order
matters: a vault admitted by the refresh is one that same pass then pulls, where
the other order would show a newly shared vault as an empty one until the minute
after. The shell is told only when the set actually changed — it rebuilds the tab
strip's vault menu from the session's list, and doing that on every quiet pass
would rebuild a menu once a minute for nothing.

The test needed the fake server to be able to do something no test here had
needed before: hand this account a vault it did not make. ShareVaultWithMe wraps
a real key to the encryption key this account enrolled, so the keyring opens it
exactly as it opens a real colleague's — a helper that filled the field with
bytes would let a vault appear in the list and never prove it could be read.

**Adding an S3 bucket on the desktop works, and could not be found.** The report
was that it is not possible; driving the real XAML headlessly says otherwise —
Keychain, + BUCKET, and the editor saves. What is true is that S3 is where
somebody goes looking, and from there SELECT BUCKET opened a combo box with
nothing in it and no sentence anywhere saying that a bucket is a keychain item.
From where the user was standing that is indistinguishable from an application
with no way to add one.

The empty state now says what a bucket is and offers a button that lands on the
keychain with the editor already open — navigating to the screen and leaving
+ BUCKET to be found among five buttons would be most of the same problem. The
phone gets the sentence and no button: its keychain screen reads and deletes and
edits nothing, so there is no editor to send anybody to, and naming the machine
that has one beats an empty control that reads as a screen still loading.

The keychain screen's layout test grew the two categories it never covered.
Tags and buckets arrived after it was written, and the header strip it measures
is one that has overflowed twice before.

**A vault can now be deleted.** DELETE /api/v1/vaults/{id}, gated on Admin —
the line the rename already drew, for a stronger version of its reason, since
this takes the vault from everybody in it at once. The row is soft-deleted and
every grant to it withdrawn in one write; VaultAccessService filters on the stamp
at both ends, so from that moment the vault is absent from every member's /me and
every call naming it answers 404. Their clients notice on the pass described
above.

The team behind it is archived when it owned nothing else, which is the mirror of
renaming it: a vault made from the vaults screen gets a team named after it that
nobody was ever shown, and leaving that behind would leave a membership list no
screen has a row for. That is a second call rather than one transaction —
archiving is TeamService's, it refuses while a team owns vaults, and it can only
tell that this one no longer does once the deletion is committed. A crash between
the two leaves an empty team: invisible, archivable afterwards, harmless, and a
better failure than a vault that could not be deleted because tidying up after it
did not work.

Two refusals worth stating. The personal vault cannot be deleted at either end:
it is created by enrollment, everything filed nowhere else lives in it, and no
call would make another. And the items are kept — ciphertext behind a vault
nothing will resolve, so deleting them buys no confidentiality while destroying
what an operator undoing a mistake would need.

The client drops the key from the keyring and the row from the cache rather than
waiting for a refresh, so the list is right immediately; the items stay, as they
stay for a vault whose grant was withdrawn, because a copy is on every other
member's machine too and removing these rows would be the client pretending to a
reach it does not have. The confirmation says that out loud before it is
answered. It is the one sentence this screen must not leave implied: deletion is
no more retroactive than revocation is. See ADR 0001.

Desktop only, deliberately. The Android vaults screen offers no rename and no
hand-over either, so adding delete alone there would be the one destructive vault
operation on a screen with no other.

Three places asserted that a vault can never be deleted — TeamService's refusal
message, the TeamNotEmpty problem code, and ADR 0009 — and each now names the
route instead.
2026-08-04 15:34:40 +02:00

213 lines
13 KiB
C#

using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Metadata;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Routing;
using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
using Shouldly;
using Xunit;
namespace DodoSSH.Api.Tests;
/// <summary>
/// Every route the server exposes, and the authorization decision behind each one.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// <para>
/// The inventory test ADR 0002 asked for. Endpoints are registered from an explicit type list in
/// <c>Setup/EndpointRegistration.cs</c> rather than found by scanning, which trades one failure mode for
/// another: nothing can appear by accident, but a type left off the list is a route that quietly does
/// not exist, with no compile error and — without this test — no failure either. Asserting the whole set
/// rather than a subset is the point. A new endpoint cannot ship until somebody writes down, here, who
/// is allowed to call it.
/// </para>
/// <para>
/// It is also the only coverage <c>/api/v1/meta</c> and <c>/.well-known/dodossh-configuration</c> have
/// in <em>this</em> assembly — <c>DodoSSH.SystemTests</c> does fetch both anonymously, but that suite
/// needs a Docker daemon and several containers, so it is not what a developer runs before pushing.
/// Both are anonymous only because they say so, and a client has nothing to authenticate with at the
/// point it reads them, so a 401 on either is unrecoverable rather than merely wrong.
/// </para>
/// <para>
/// What this does <em>not</em> cover: <see cref="Describe"/> reads only <see cref="IAuthorizeData.Policy"/>,
/// so a role, claim, scope or authentication-scheme requirement could be added or removed without
/// failing here. Nothing uses those today; the day something does, this table needs a column.
/// </para>
/// </remarks>
[Collection(ApiCollection.Name)]
public sealed class EndpointInventoryTests(ApiFixture fixture)
{
private static readonly string[] Expected =
[
// Anonymous by necessity: discovery has to work before a token exists.
"GET /api/v1/meta name=GetMeta tags= policies= anon=True",
"GET /.well-known/dodossh-configuration name=GetDodoSshConfiguration tags= policies= anon=True",
// Authenticated, not Enrolled: these three are how a caller discovers it must enroll, does so,
// and — for revocation — withdraws a lost machine even if its enrollment state is in doubt.
"GET /api/v1/me name=GetMe tags=Identity policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/me/enrollment name=Enroll tags=Identity policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"DELETE /api/v1/me/devices/{deviceId:guid} name=RevokeDevice tags=Identity policies=Authenticated anon=False",
// The one endpoint in the /me area that needs a key bundle to already exist.
"POST /api/v1/me/devices name=RegisterDevice tags=Identity policies=Authenticated,Enrolled anon=False",
// Enrolled: a caller with no identity key can neither write ciphertext anyone can read nor read
// what is there.
"POST /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid}/sync/pull name=SyncPull tags=Sync policies=Enrolled anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid}/sync/push name=SyncPush tags=Sync policies=Enrolled anon=False",
// Enrolled, because the answer exists to be wrapped to and a caller with no key of their own has
// nothing to wrap and no signature to attribute it with. There is no search here — see
// DirectoryService for why an exact-match-only directory is a decision rather than a shortcut.
"GET /api/v1/directory name=LookupDirectory tags=Identity policies=Enrolled anon=False",
// The other half of the same decision: the directory says what a key is, this is how a client
// checks that claim against a chain the server cannot rewrite without every other client
// noticing. Nothing in it is secret.
"GET /api/v1/keylog name=ReadKeyLog tags=Identity policies=Enrolled anon=False",
// Authenticated, not Enrolled: reading and joining teams needs no key, and a member added before
// they have set a vault up must still be able to see the team they are now in.
"GET /api/v1/teams name=ListTeams tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"GET /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/members name=ListTeamMembers tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/members name=AddTeamMember tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"PUT /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/members/{userId:guid}/role name=ChangeTeamMemberRole tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"DELETE /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/members/{userId:guid} name=RemoveTeamMember tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
// Administering a team you are already in, and none of it moves key material — so Authenticated
// for the same reason the membership routes above are. Two of the three are gated harder inside
// the handler than this table can show: archiving and handing the team over check for the owner
// rather than for an admin, because an admin the owner promoted must not be able to take the
// team from them. See TeamAccess.IsOwner.
"PUT /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid} name=UpdateTeam tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"DELETE /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid} name=ArchiveTeam tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/owner name=TransferTeamOwnership tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
// Authenticated, and pointedly not Enrolled. An invitation names an address that may have no
// account at all and certainly holds no key; gating these on Enrolled would be demanding a key
// of the one participant the feature exists for. Membership is not readability — somebody still
// has to wrap the vault key afterwards — so no key is involved on either side.
"GET /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/invitations name=ListTeamInvitations tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/invitations name=CreateTeamInvitation tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"DELETE /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/invitations/{invitationId:guid} name=RevokeTeamInvitation tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
// Enrolled, because both end in a vault key being wrapped: creating a team means creating a vault
// in it, and neither is reachable without a key of one's own.
"POST /api/v1/teams name=CreateTeam tags=Teams policies=Enrolled anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/vaults name=CreateTeamVault tags=Teams policies=Enrolled anon=False",
// Enrolled. The listing is gated on Read rather than Share — every member can already see the
// sharing graph — and the two writes are gated on Share inside the handler, which this table
// cannot see. See VaultGrantEndpoints.
// Authenticated, alone among the vault routes: renaming touches no key material, so refusing
// somebody who has not published an identity key would be refusing them for an unrelated
// reason. Gated on Admin inside the handler, which this table cannot see.
"PUT /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid} name=RenameVault tags=Vaults policies=Authenticated anon=False",
// Authenticated for the same reason as the rename it sits beside — deleting withdraws grants
// rather than wrapping anything, so it needs no key of the caller's — and gated on Admin inside
// the handler, which this table cannot see. It refuses a personal vault there too.
"DELETE /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid} name=DeleteVault tags=Vaults policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"GET /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid}/grants name=ListVaultGrants tags=Vaults policies=Enrolled anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid}/grants name=IssueVaultGrant tags=Vaults policies=Enrolled anon=False",
"DELETE /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid}/grants/{userId:guid} name=RevokeVaultGrant tags=Vaults policies=Enrolled anon=False",
// Gated on Share inside the handler as the two writes above are, and additionally on holding the
// current key — which no policy could express, since it is a row in vault_key_grant.
"POST /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid}/rekey name=RekeyVault tags=Vaults policies=Enrolled anon=False",
// Anonymous on purpose, and load-bearing: DodoSSH.SystemTests waits on /healthz/ready before any
// token exists, and an orchestrator probe that needs credentials reports the wrong thing.
// MapHealthChecks constrains no verb, hence ANY.
"ANY /healthz/live name= tags= policies= anon=True",
"ANY /healthz/ready name= tags= policies= anon=True",
"ANY /healthz/startup name= tags= policies= anon=True",
// Not ours. FastEndpoints maps this one itself, in every environment, with no way to opt out; it
// answers with the server's whole endpoint-name-to-route table. It stays registered and is
// short-circuited to 404 instead — see RouteTableIsNotReachable below. Listed so that a version
// bump which adds a second hidden route, or renames this one out from under the block, fails
// here rather than in production.
"GET _test_url_cache_ name= tags= policies= anon=False",
];
[Fact]
public void TheServerExposesExactlyTheEndpointsWeMeantTo()
{
// Forces the pipeline to be built. FastEndpoints registers its routes when the application is
// built, not when its services are, so resolving the data sources from an unstarted host finds
// the health checks and nothing else.
using var client = fixture.CreateClient();
var actual = fixture.Services.GetServices<EndpointDataSource>()
.SelectMany(source => source.Endpoints)
.OfType<RouteEndpoint>()
.Select(Describe)
.Order(StringComparer.Ordinal)
.ToArray();
actual.ShouldBe([.. Expected.Order(StringComparer.Ordinal)]);
}
/// <remarks>
/// <para>
/// Distinct from the inventory above, which only proves the route is registered. This proves it does
/// not answer.
/// </para>
/// <para>
/// Every spelling routing accepts is asserted, not just the canonical one. Routing matches literal
/// segments case-insensitively and tolerates a trailing slash, so a block that compares the request
/// path with <c>StringComparison.Ordinal</c> passes a canonical-spelling test while leaving the
/// listing fully readable at <c>/_TEST_URL_CACHE_</c>. That is not hypothetical — it is what the
/// first version of this guard did, and a single-spelling test is what let it look correct.
/// </para>
/// </remarks>
[Theory]
[InlineData("/_test_url_cache_")]
[InlineData("/_TEST_URL_CACHE_")]
[InlineData("/_Test_Url_Cache_")]
[InlineData("/_test_url_cache_/")]
public async Task RouteTableIsNotReachable(string path)
{
// Authenticated on purpose: the deny-by-default policy already stops an anonymous caller, so a
// 404 for one would prove nothing about whether the listing is exposed.
var client = fixture.CreateClientFor(subject: $"route-table-{Guid.CreateVersion7()}");
var response = await client.GetAsync(
new Uri(path, UriKind.Relative),
TestContext.Current.CancellationToken);
response.StatusCode.ShouldBe(System.Net.HttpStatusCode.NotFound);
// A 404 with the listing in the body would satisfy the status assertion on its own.
var body = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync(TestContext.Current.CancellationToken);
body.ShouldNotContain("Endpoint", Case.Insensitive);
}
private static string Describe(RouteEndpoint endpoint)
{
var methods = endpoint.Metadata.GetMetadata<HttpMethodMetadata>()?.HttpMethods;
var verbs = methods is { Count: > 0 } ? string.Join(",", methods) : "ANY";
var name = endpoint.Metadata.GetMetadata<IEndpointNameMetadata>()?.EndpointName ?? string.Empty;
var tags = string.Join(",", endpoint.Metadata.GetMetadata<ITagsMetadata>()?.Tags ?? []);
// FastEndpoints adds a synthetic "epPolicy:<full type name>" beside the named policies, and
// including it would couple this table to endpoint class names. Dropping it is not free: that
// policy is also where FastEndpoints folds Roles(), Claims() and Permissions(), so those become
// invisible here. Nothing calls them — the two named policies carry the whole authorization
// decision — and the class remarks say so, rather than this filter pretending it discards nothing.
var policies = string.Join(
",",
endpoint.Metadata.OfType<IAuthorizeData>()
.Select(data => data.Policy)
.Where(policy => !string.IsNullOrEmpty(policy))
.Where(policy => !policy!.StartsWith("epPolicy:", StringComparison.Ordinal)));
var anonymous = endpoint.Metadata.GetMetadata<IAllowAnonymous>() is not null;
return $"{verbs} {endpoint.RoutePattern.RawText} name={name} tags={tags} policies={policies} anon={anonymous}";
}
}