Files
DodoSSH/tests/DodoSSH.Api.Tests/EndpointInventoryTests.cs
T
jaap-jan 8707629a6c Make the vault the thing you share, and ask a host which one it lives in
The teams screen listed teams that owned vaults, so sharing four servers with two
colleagues meant creating a team, then a vault inside it, then wrapping a key.
Two of those three steps are about a concept nobody arrives wanting. The screen
now lists vaults: naming one creates the membership list that carries it, named
after the vault and owned by you, and members, invitations, roles, hand-over and
key holders all hang off the vault they apply to.

Nothing on the server moved. VaultAccessService still resolves a shared vault
through team_membership and every membership call still names a team id — what
went is the requirement that anybody make one. The split the whole design rests
on is untouched and is still what the screen is built around: adding somebody
authorises the server to serve them, and only a machine holding the key can make
the vault readable. ADR 0009 keeps its decision and gains an addendum recording
which half of it a person is now asked about.

The one place the team resurfaces is a membership list carrying several vaults,
which this screen cannot produce and does not hide: the members section says so,
because "adding somebody here adds them there" is precisely the fact a
vault-shaped screen is in a position to conceal.

Two things left the interface and one arrived. Creating a team is gone, and so is
archiving one — it was only ever possible for a team owning no vaults, and a
screen whose rows are vaults has no row for one, so the button would have been
unreachable or always refused. The endpoint is unchanged and the screen states
the limit instead, since a vault cannot be deleted at all. The exception is a
create whose second call failed: cancelling that form archives the membership
list it left behind, which is a deliberate departure from this client's rule
against tidying up on the user's behalf, made because nothing else can reach it.

What arrived is PUT /api/v1/vaults/{id}. Without it the screen loses its only
editing action, since renaming the team behind a vault is invisible to everybody
who was never shown the team. It is gated on PermissionFlags.Admin — the line
UpdateTeamEndpoint already draws, because a name is what everybody in the vault
sees it called rather than part of its contents — and it renames the owning team
with it when that team carries nothing else, so the row an operator reads and the
name a user says cannot drift apart. The slug never moves, for the reason it does
not move on a team rename. The session edits its cached vault row rather than
replacing it with the response, which deliberately carries no wrapped key.

The host editor now asks which vault a host goes into, beside the name, while
adding and only where there is more than one vault to write to. It is a second
picker rather than the keychain screen's reused, and the two selections are
separate on purpose: that one is a standing preference about where new items go,
this is a field of the host in front of you, and binding both to one selection
would mean a click on the other screen could move a half-typed host. An existing
host is not offered it at all rather than offered it disabled — the two vaults
are encrypted under different keys, so moving an item is a delete and a retype.

That forced a fix worth naming. The group picker was built from the active
vault's groups whatever vault the host was being filed into, so a host put in a
shared vault could be filed under a group only its author can resolve — a
colleague would see it filed under nothing, which is the quietest kind of wrong.
Groups are now kept per vault and the picker follows the vault choice.

Two renames, because the pair they would otherwise have made is a bug farm:
ShellScreen.Vault became Keychain and VaultScreen became KeychainScreen, which is
what the rail has always labelled that screen, leaving Vault for one vault's
contents and Vaults for the vaults themselves. The enum values are unchanged;
NavRail.axaml writes them as x:Static literals.

1536 tests pass, seven more than before. Five are new on the server — the rename
endpoint's success, the team it does and does not take with it, the two refusals
and the empty name — and the client suite gains six and folds four together,
having lost the two about archiving a team.
2026-08-04 12:22:29 +02:00

204 lines
12 KiB
C#

using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Metadata;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Routing;
using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
using Shouldly;
using Xunit;
namespace DodoSSH.Api.Tests;
/// <summary>
/// Every route the server exposes, and the authorization decision behind each one.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// <para>
/// The inventory test ADR 0002 asked for. Endpoints are registered from an explicit type list in
/// <c>Setup/EndpointRegistration.cs</c> rather than found by scanning, which trades one failure mode for
/// another: nothing can appear by accident, but a type left off the list is a route that quietly does
/// not exist, with no compile error and — without this test — no failure either. Asserting the whole set
/// rather than a subset is the point. A new endpoint cannot ship until somebody writes down, here, who
/// is allowed to call it.
/// </para>
/// <para>
/// It is also the only coverage <c>/api/v1/meta</c> and <c>/.well-known/dodossh-configuration</c> have
/// in <em>this</em> assembly — <c>DodoSSH.SystemTests</c> does fetch both anonymously, but that suite
/// needs a Docker daemon and several containers, so it is not what a developer runs before pushing.
/// Both are anonymous only because they say so, and a client has nothing to authenticate with at the
/// point it reads them, so a 401 on either is unrecoverable rather than merely wrong.
/// </para>
/// <para>
/// What this does <em>not</em> cover: <see cref="Describe"/> reads only <see cref="IAuthorizeData.Policy"/>,
/// so a role, claim, scope or authentication-scheme requirement could be added or removed without
/// failing here. Nothing uses those today; the day something does, this table needs a column.
/// </para>
/// </remarks>
[Collection(ApiCollection.Name)]
public sealed class EndpointInventoryTests(ApiFixture fixture)
{
private static readonly string[] Expected =
[
// Anonymous by necessity: discovery has to work before a token exists.
"GET /api/v1/meta name=GetMeta tags= policies= anon=True",
"GET /.well-known/dodossh-configuration name=GetDodoSshConfiguration tags= policies= anon=True",
// Authenticated, not Enrolled: these three are how a caller discovers it must enroll, does so,
// and — for revocation — withdraws a lost machine even if its enrollment state is in doubt.
"GET /api/v1/me name=GetMe tags=Identity policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/me/enrollment name=Enroll tags=Identity policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"DELETE /api/v1/me/devices/{deviceId:guid} name=RevokeDevice tags=Identity policies=Authenticated anon=False",
// The one endpoint in the /me area that needs a key bundle to already exist.
"POST /api/v1/me/devices name=RegisterDevice tags=Identity policies=Authenticated,Enrolled anon=False",
// Enrolled: a caller with no identity key can neither write ciphertext anyone can read nor read
// what is there.
"POST /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid}/sync/pull name=SyncPull tags=Sync policies=Enrolled anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid}/sync/push name=SyncPush tags=Sync policies=Enrolled anon=False",
// Enrolled, because the answer exists to be wrapped to and a caller with no key of their own has
// nothing to wrap and no signature to attribute it with. There is no search here — see
// DirectoryService for why an exact-match-only directory is a decision rather than a shortcut.
"GET /api/v1/directory name=LookupDirectory tags=Identity policies=Enrolled anon=False",
// The other half of the same decision: the directory says what a key is, this is how a client
// checks that claim against a chain the server cannot rewrite without every other client
// noticing. Nothing in it is secret.
"GET /api/v1/keylog name=ReadKeyLog tags=Identity policies=Enrolled anon=False",
// Authenticated, not Enrolled: reading and joining teams needs no key, and a member added before
// they have set a vault up must still be able to see the team they are now in.
"GET /api/v1/teams name=ListTeams tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"GET /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/members name=ListTeamMembers tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/members name=AddTeamMember tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"PUT /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/members/{userId:guid}/role name=ChangeTeamMemberRole tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"DELETE /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/members/{userId:guid} name=RemoveTeamMember tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
// Administering a team you are already in, and none of it moves key material — so Authenticated
// for the same reason the membership routes above are. Two of the three are gated harder inside
// the handler than this table can show: archiving and handing the team over check for the owner
// rather than for an admin, because an admin the owner promoted must not be able to take the
// team from them. See TeamAccess.IsOwner.
"PUT /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid} name=UpdateTeam tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"DELETE /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid} name=ArchiveTeam tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/owner name=TransferTeamOwnership tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
// Authenticated, and pointedly not Enrolled. An invitation names an address that may have no
// account at all and certainly holds no key; gating these on Enrolled would be demanding a key
// of the one participant the feature exists for. Membership is not readability — somebody still
// has to wrap the vault key afterwards — so no key is involved on either side.
"GET /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/invitations name=ListTeamInvitations tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/invitations name=CreateTeamInvitation tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"DELETE /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/invitations/{invitationId:guid} name=RevokeTeamInvitation tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
// Enrolled, because both end in a vault key being wrapped: creating a team means creating a vault
// in it, and neither is reachable without a key of one's own.
"POST /api/v1/teams name=CreateTeam tags=Teams policies=Enrolled anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/vaults name=CreateTeamVault tags=Teams policies=Enrolled anon=False",
// Enrolled. The listing is gated on Read rather than Share — every member can already see the
// sharing graph — and the two writes are gated on Share inside the handler, which this table
// cannot see. See VaultGrantEndpoints.
// Authenticated, alone among the vault routes: renaming touches no key material, so refusing
// somebody who has not published an identity key would be refusing them for an unrelated
// reason. Gated on Admin inside the handler, which this table cannot see.
"PUT /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid} name=RenameVault tags=Vaults policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"GET /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid}/grants name=ListVaultGrants tags=Vaults policies=Enrolled anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid}/grants name=IssueVaultGrant tags=Vaults policies=Enrolled anon=False",
"DELETE /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid}/grants/{userId:guid} name=RevokeVaultGrant tags=Vaults policies=Enrolled anon=False",
// Anonymous on purpose, and load-bearing: DodoSSH.SystemTests waits on /healthz/ready before any
// token exists, and an orchestrator probe that needs credentials reports the wrong thing.
// MapHealthChecks constrains no verb, hence ANY.
"ANY /healthz/live name= tags= policies= anon=True",
"ANY /healthz/ready name= tags= policies= anon=True",
"ANY /healthz/startup name= tags= policies= anon=True",
// Not ours. FastEndpoints maps this one itself, in every environment, with no way to opt out; it
// answers with the server's whole endpoint-name-to-route table. It stays registered and is
// short-circuited to 404 instead — see RouteTableIsNotReachable below. Listed so that a version
// bump which adds a second hidden route, or renames this one out from under the block, fails
// here rather than in production.
"GET _test_url_cache_ name= tags= policies= anon=False",
];
[Fact]
public void TheServerExposesExactlyTheEndpointsWeMeantTo()
{
// Forces the pipeline to be built. FastEndpoints registers its routes when the application is
// built, not when its services are, so resolving the data sources from an unstarted host finds
// the health checks and nothing else.
using var client = fixture.CreateClient();
var actual = fixture.Services.GetServices<EndpointDataSource>()
.SelectMany(source => source.Endpoints)
.OfType<RouteEndpoint>()
.Select(Describe)
.Order(StringComparer.Ordinal)
.ToArray();
actual.ShouldBe([.. Expected.Order(StringComparer.Ordinal)]);
}
/// <remarks>
/// <para>
/// Distinct from the inventory above, which only proves the route is registered. This proves it does
/// not answer.
/// </para>
/// <para>
/// Every spelling routing accepts is asserted, not just the canonical one. Routing matches literal
/// segments case-insensitively and tolerates a trailing slash, so a block that compares the request
/// path with <c>StringComparison.Ordinal</c> passes a canonical-spelling test while leaving the
/// listing fully readable at <c>/_TEST_URL_CACHE_</c>. That is not hypothetical — it is what the
/// first version of this guard did, and a single-spelling test is what let it look correct.
/// </para>
/// </remarks>
[Theory]
[InlineData("/_test_url_cache_")]
[InlineData("/_TEST_URL_CACHE_")]
[InlineData("/_Test_Url_Cache_")]
[InlineData("/_test_url_cache_/")]
public async Task RouteTableIsNotReachable(string path)
{
// Authenticated on purpose: the deny-by-default policy already stops an anonymous caller, so a
// 404 for one would prove nothing about whether the listing is exposed.
var client = fixture.CreateClientFor(subject: $"route-table-{Guid.CreateVersion7()}");
var response = await client.GetAsync(
new Uri(path, UriKind.Relative),
TestContext.Current.CancellationToken);
response.StatusCode.ShouldBe(System.Net.HttpStatusCode.NotFound);
// A 404 with the listing in the body would satisfy the status assertion on its own.
var body = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync(TestContext.Current.CancellationToken);
body.ShouldNotContain("Endpoint", Case.Insensitive);
}
private static string Describe(RouteEndpoint endpoint)
{
var methods = endpoint.Metadata.GetMetadata<HttpMethodMetadata>()?.HttpMethods;
var verbs = methods is { Count: > 0 } ? string.Join(",", methods) : "ANY";
var name = endpoint.Metadata.GetMetadata<IEndpointNameMetadata>()?.EndpointName ?? string.Empty;
var tags = string.Join(",", endpoint.Metadata.GetMetadata<ITagsMetadata>()?.Tags ?? []);
// FastEndpoints adds a synthetic "epPolicy:<full type name>" beside the named policies, and
// including it would couple this table to endpoint class names. Dropping it is not free: that
// policy is also where FastEndpoints folds Roles(), Claims() and Permissions(), so those become
// invisible here. Nothing calls them — the two named policies carry the whole authorization
// decision — and the class remarks say so, rather than this filter pretending it discards nothing.
var policies = string.Join(
",",
endpoint.Metadata.OfType<IAuthorizeData>()
.Select(data => data.Policy)
.Where(policy => !string.IsNullOrEmpty(policy))
.Where(policy => !policy!.StartsWith("epPolicy:", StringComparison.Ordinal)));
var anonymous = endpoint.Metadata.GetMetadata<IAllowAnonymous>() is not null;
return $"{verbs} {endpoint.RoutePattern.RawText} name={name} tags={tags} policies={policies} anon={anonymous}";
}
}