Files
DodoSSH/tests/DodoSSH.Api.Tests/EndpointInventoryTests.cs
T
jaap-jan a0568d4c35 Merge branch 'main' into the vaults screen, and let it rotate keys too
Main built vault key rotation while this branch was reshaping the screen that
would drive it, so the two met in the same three files. Every other conflict was
textual and resolved by taking both; these are the ones where a decision had to
be made.

**The view model.** Main taught TeamsViewModel three things and this branch had
renamed and rewritten it into VaultsViewModel. All three are ported rather than
dropped, because each is a behaviour rather than wording: adding somebody now
wraps the vault to them on the spot instead of leaving SHARE KEY to be pressed,
removing somebody rotates the vault and hands the new key to whoever is left, and
a share reports how many generations were wrapped. The session calls they reach —
ShareTeamVaultsAsync and RekeyTeamVaultsAsync — are scoped to a membership list
rather than to one vault, and they are called that way here rather than narrowed:
adding somebody is a change to the list, so every vault the list carries is one
they can now fetch. This screen makes lists that carry one vault, so the sentences
name one; where a list carries several, naming them all is the honest report, and
the members section already says the list is shared.

AddMemberAsync ran two lines over the length limit once the sharing was in it, so
the calls behind it moved to AddOrInviteAsync and the three-way refusal to
WhyNobodyCanBeAdded — the command reads as its guards now, which is what it was
before the sharing arrived.

**The tests.** Main's four new cases are ported to the vault-first API, including
the one that matters most: the tampered key log is corrupted *before* the add,
because the add is now a route to a wrap and a test that corrupted it afterwards
would be asserting about the manual route only. SelectingAVault_ListsWhoHoldsAKey
now expects two holders rather than one — main's fake records the creator's own
self-grant, and a key-holder list that omitted it would show the one person who
can certainly open a new vault as somebody who cannot.

**The README.** The limits list is six rather than four or five: main's rotation
entries and this branch's "a vault cannot be deleted" describe different things
and both are true. "The rekey is flagged, never performed" is gone, since it is
now performed, and M3 reads *Done* rather than *Done, except rekey*.

One thing worth writing down that neither side had. An invitation claimed at
sign-in still leaves the key owed, where an add does not: at the moment an
invitation is issued there is no account and no published key to wrap to, and the
claim happens on the invitee's machine, which holds nothing. Manual check 12.1
says so, because a reader who knows adding shares would otherwise read that step
as stale.

1561 tests pass.
2026-08-04 13:58:56 +02:00

208 lines
13 KiB
C#

using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Metadata;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Routing;
using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
using Shouldly;
using Xunit;
namespace DodoSSH.Api.Tests;
/// <summary>
/// Every route the server exposes, and the authorization decision behind each one.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// <para>
/// The inventory test ADR 0002 asked for. Endpoints are registered from an explicit type list in
/// <c>Setup/EndpointRegistration.cs</c> rather than found by scanning, which trades one failure mode for
/// another: nothing can appear by accident, but a type left off the list is a route that quietly does
/// not exist, with no compile error and — without this test — no failure either. Asserting the whole set
/// rather than a subset is the point. A new endpoint cannot ship until somebody writes down, here, who
/// is allowed to call it.
/// </para>
/// <para>
/// It is also the only coverage <c>/api/v1/meta</c> and <c>/.well-known/dodossh-configuration</c> have
/// in <em>this</em> assembly — <c>DodoSSH.SystemTests</c> does fetch both anonymously, but that suite
/// needs a Docker daemon and several containers, so it is not what a developer runs before pushing.
/// Both are anonymous only because they say so, and a client has nothing to authenticate with at the
/// point it reads them, so a 401 on either is unrecoverable rather than merely wrong.
/// </para>
/// <para>
/// What this does <em>not</em> cover: <see cref="Describe"/> reads only <see cref="IAuthorizeData.Policy"/>,
/// so a role, claim, scope or authentication-scheme requirement could be added or removed without
/// failing here. Nothing uses those today; the day something does, this table needs a column.
/// </para>
/// </remarks>
[Collection(ApiCollection.Name)]
public sealed class EndpointInventoryTests(ApiFixture fixture)
{
private static readonly string[] Expected =
[
// Anonymous by necessity: discovery has to work before a token exists.
"GET /api/v1/meta name=GetMeta tags= policies= anon=True",
"GET /.well-known/dodossh-configuration name=GetDodoSshConfiguration tags= policies= anon=True",
// Authenticated, not Enrolled: these three are how a caller discovers it must enroll, does so,
// and — for revocation — withdraws a lost machine even if its enrollment state is in doubt.
"GET /api/v1/me name=GetMe tags=Identity policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/me/enrollment name=Enroll tags=Identity policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"DELETE /api/v1/me/devices/{deviceId:guid} name=RevokeDevice tags=Identity policies=Authenticated anon=False",
// The one endpoint in the /me area that needs a key bundle to already exist.
"POST /api/v1/me/devices name=RegisterDevice tags=Identity policies=Authenticated,Enrolled anon=False",
// Enrolled: a caller with no identity key can neither write ciphertext anyone can read nor read
// what is there.
"POST /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid}/sync/pull name=SyncPull tags=Sync policies=Enrolled anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid}/sync/push name=SyncPush tags=Sync policies=Enrolled anon=False",
// Enrolled, because the answer exists to be wrapped to and a caller with no key of their own has
// nothing to wrap and no signature to attribute it with. There is no search here — see
// DirectoryService for why an exact-match-only directory is a decision rather than a shortcut.
"GET /api/v1/directory name=LookupDirectory tags=Identity policies=Enrolled anon=False",
// The other half of the same decision: the directory says what a key is, this is how a client
// checks that claim against a chain the server cannot rewrite without every other client
// noticing. Nothing in it is secret.
"GET /api/v1/keylog name=ReadKeyLog tags=Identity policies=Enrolled anon=False",
// Authenticated, not Enrolled: reading and joining teams needs no key, and a member added before
// they have set a vault up must still be able to see the team they are now in.
"GET /api/v1/teams name=ListTeams tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"GET /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/members name=ListTeamMembers tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/members name=AddTeamMember tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"PUT /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/members/{userId:guid}/role name=ChangeTeamMemberRole tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"DELETE /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/members/{userId:guid} name=RemoveTeamMember tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
// Administering a team you are already in, and none of it moves key material — so Authenticated
// for the same reason the membership routes above are. Two of the three are gated harder inside
// the handler than this table can show: archiving and handing the team over check for the owner
// rather than for an admin, because an admin the owner promoted must not be able to take the
// team from them. See TeamAccess.IsOwner.
"PUT /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid} name=UpdateTeam tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"DELETE /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid} name=ArchiveTeam tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/owner name=TransferTeamOwnership tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
// Authenticated, and pointedly not Enrolled. An invitation names an address that may have no
// account at all and certainly holds no key; gating these on Enrolled would be demanding a key
// of the one participant the feature exists for. Membership is not readability — somebody still
// has to wrap the vault key afterwards — so no key is involved on either side.
"GET /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/invitations name=ListTeamInvitations tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/invitations name=CreateTeamInvitation tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"DELETE /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/invitations/{invitationId:guid} name=RevokeTeamInvitation tags=Teams policies=Authenticated anon=False",
// Enrolled, because both end in a vault key being wrapped: creating a team means creating a vault
// in it, and neither is reachable without a key of one's own.
"POST /api/v1/teams name=CreateTeam tags=Teams policies=Enrolled anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/teams/{teamId:guid}/vaults name=CreateTeamVault tags=Teams policies=Enrolled anon=False",
// Enrolled. The listing is gated on Read rather than Share — every member can already see the
// sharing graph — and the two writes are gated on Share inside the handler, which this table
// cannot see. See VaultGrantEndpoints.
// Authenticated, alone among the vault routes: renaming touches no key material, so refusing
// somebody who has not published an identity key would be refusing them for an unrelated
// reason. Gated on Admin inside the handler, which this table cannot see.
"PUT /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid} name=RenameVault tags=Vaults policies=Authenticated anon=False",
"GET /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid}/grants name=ListVaultGrants tags=Vaults policies=Enrolled anon=False",
"POST /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid}/grants name=IssueVaultGrant tags=Vaults policies=Enrolled anon=False",
"DELETE /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid}/grants/{userId:guid} name=RevokeVaultGrant tags=Vaults policies=Enrolled anon=False",
// Gated on Share inside the handler as the two writes above are, and additionally on holding the
// current key — which no policy could express, since it is a row in vault_key_grant.
"POST /api/v1/vaults/{vaultId:guid}/rekey name=RekeyVault tags=Vaults policies=Enrolled anon=False",
// Anonymous on purpose, and load-bearing: DodoSSH.SystemTests waits on /healthz/ready before any
// token exists, and an orchestrator probe that needs credentials reports the wrong thing.
// MapHealthChecks constrains no verb, hence ANY.
"ANY /healthz/live name= tags= policies= anon=True",
"ANY /healthz/ready name= tags= policies= anon=True",
"ANY /healthz/startup name= tags= policies= anon=True",
// Not ours. FastEndpoints maps this one itself, in every environment, with no way to opt out; it
// answers with the server's whole endpoint-name-to-route table. It stays registered and is
// short-circuited to 404 instead — see RouteTableIsNotReachable below. Listed so that a version
// bump which adds a second hidden route, or renames this one out from under the block, fails
// here rather than in production.
"GET _test_url_cache_ name= tags= policies= anon=False",
];
[Fact]
public void TheServerExposesExactlyTheEndpointsWeMeantTo()
{
// Forces the pipeline to be built. FastEndpoints registers its routes when the application is
// built, not when its services are, so resolving the data sources from an unstarted host finds
// the health checks and nothing else.
using var client = fixture.CreateClient();
var actual = fixture.Services.GetServices<EndpointDataSource>()
.SelectMany(source => source.Endpoints)
.OfType<RouteEndpoint>()
.Select(Describe)
.Order(StringComparer.Ordinal)
.ToArray();
actual.ShouldBe([.. Expected.Order(StringComparer.Ordinal)]);
}
/// <remarks>
/// <para>
/// Distinct from the inventory above, which only proves the route is registered. This proves it does
/// not answer.
/// </para>
/// <para>
/// Every spelling routing accepts is asserted, not just the canonical one. Routing matches literal
/// segments case-insensitively and tolerates a trailing slash, so a block that compares the request
/// path with <c>StringComparison.Ordinal</c> passes a canonical-spelling test while leaving the
/// listing fully readable at <c>/_TEST_URL_CACHE_</c>. That is not hypothetical — it is what the
/// first version of this guard did, and a single-spelling test is what let it look correct.
/// </para>
/// </remarks>
[Theory]
[InlineData("/_test_url_cache_")]
[InlineData("/_TEST_URL_CACHE_")]
[InlineData("/_Test_Url_Cache_")]
[InlineData("/_test_url_cache_/")]
public async Task RouteTableIsNotReachable(string path)
{
// Authenticated on purpose: the deny-by-default policy already stops an anonymous caller, so a
// 404 for one would prove nothing about whether the listing is exposed.
var client = fixture.CreateClientFor(subject: $"route-table-{Guid.CreateVersion7()}");
var response = await client.GetAsync(
new Uri(path, UriKind.Relative),
TestContext.Current.CancellationToken);
response.StatusCode.ShouldBe(System.Net.HttpStatusCode.NotFound);
// A 404 with the listing in the body would satisfy the status assertion on its own.
var body = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync(TestContext.Current.CancellationToken);
body.ShouldNotContain("Endpoint", Case.Insensitive);
}
private static string Describe(RouteEndpoint endpoint)
{
var methods = endpoint.Metadata.GetMetadata<HttpMethodMetadata>()?.HttpMethods;
var verbs = methods is { Count: > 0 } ? string.Join(",", methods) : "ANY";
var name = endpoint.Metadata.GetMetadata<IEndpointNameMetadata>()?.EndpointName ?? string.Empty;
var tags = string.Join(",", endpoint.Metadata.GetMetadata<ITagsMetadata>()?.Tags ?? []);
// FastEndpoints adds a synthetic "epPolicy:<full type name>" beside the named policies, and
// including it would couple this table to endpoint class names. Dropping it is not free: that
// policy is also where FastEndpoints folds Roles(), Claims() and Permissions(), so those become
// invisible here. Nothing calls them — the two named policies carry the whole authorization
// decision — and the class remarks say so, rather than this filter pretending it discards nothing.
var policies = string.Join(
",",
endpoint.Metadata.OfType<IAuthorizeData>()
.Select(data => data.Policy)
.Where(policy => !string.IsNullOrEmpty(policy))
.Where(policy => !policy!.StartsWith("epPolicy:", StringComparison.Ordinal)));
var anonymous = endpoint.Metadata.GetMetadata<IAllowAnonymous>() is not null;
return $"{verbs} {endpoint.RoutePattern.RawText} name={name} tags={tags} policies={policies} anon={anonymous}";
}
}